It is Time for President Trump to Declare a Four-Year Moratorium on Responding to, or Acknowledging Politically Motivated Lawsuits

He made a statement, you guys use the term "rebuke"

He said nothing about the issue of District Judges deciding the have jurisdiction over the entire United States, as well as thinking they have power over the elected President performing his constitutional duties.
YOu'e a funny guy.
 
That's a cool string of lies, kid.

Didja write it yourself or copy it from the daily talking points like you usually do?
Nope gramps, your list "DOGE" "Immigration" "DEI"

Your cult has filed the lawsuits to prevent DOGE from exposing and eliminating fraud waste and abuse.
Your cult has filed the lawsuits to prevent Trump from deporting these guys
1742398789906.webp

You cult has filed the lawsuits keep this dude
1742398864160.webp
in the locker room with our daughters.

Why are you running away from it?
 
Josh Hawley is a MAG pussy. Khan was right. She actually advocates for religious freedom against the Christian nationalist theocracy those like you want imposed.
Advocated for religious freedom by arguing that a mayor can shut down churches over COVID while herself participating in shoulder-to-shoulder protests.

Gotta love Dem "logic."
 
Nope gramps, your list "DOGE" "Immigration" "DEI"

Your cult has filed the lawsuits to prevent DOGE from exposing and eliminating fraud waste and abuse.
Your cult has filed the lawsuits to prevent Trump from deporting these guys View attachment 1091165
You cult has filed the lawsuits keep this dude View attachment 1091166 in the locker room with our daughters.

Why are you running away from it?
And he said the "C" word.

Everybody knows what that means by now.

everybody.webp
 
Prove they weren't.
I can't prove that every prisoner on death row committed murder, but that doesn't mean they should be released.

It's an "if" question. Hypothetical, get it? The answer should be easy.

If deporting a plane load of Tren de Aragua prevents even one American from being murdered, or one immigrant child from being gang-raped and trafficked is it worth it?

I can't believe that even you are too chickenshit to answer.
 
I can't prove that every prisoner on death row committed murder, but that doesn't mean they should be released.

It's an "if" question. Hypothetical, get it? The answer should be easy.

If deporting a plane load of Tren de Aragua prevents even one American from being murdered, or one immigrant child from being gang-raped and trafficked is it worth it?

I can't believe that even you are too chickenshit to answer.
All those folks an death row got their day in court.

Did the people on that plane?

Now prove that's what they were.

You can't.

Nobody can.

Why?

Because they didn't get their day in court.
 
That is an 18th street gang picture, Rawley. But you didn't know that till now.
 
It's time for President Trump to declare a four-year moratorium on the White House or the Justice Department responding or even acknowledging these kind of lawsuits.


The Trump administration likely violated the Constitution when it effectively shuttered the U.S. Agency for International Development, a federal judge has ruled.

In a 68-page opinion Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Theodore Chuang, an Obama appointee, wrote that "the Court finds that Defendants' actions taken to shut down USAID on an accelerated basis, including its apparent decision to permanently close USAID headquarters without the approval of a duly appointed USAID Officer, likely violated the United States Constitution in multiple ways, and that these actions harmed not only Plaintiffs, but also the public interest, because they deprived the public's elected representatives in Congress of their constitutional authority to decide whether, when, and how to close down an agency created by Congress."

First of all Congress has spoken on the topic of USAID many times. Just a random sample of their findings:

WASHINGTON—The Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held a hearing today titled “America Last: How Foreign Aid Undermined U.S. Interests Around the World” to expose egregious foreign aid spending, review proposed reforms, and aid the Trump Administration’s efforts to implement America-first foreign aid policies. Members of the Subcommittee presented an overwhelming array of examples illustrating how the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent taxpayer dollars on programs that undermine American interests. Expert witnesses slammed the Biden Administration for blindly doling out money and not conducting proper oversight of tax dollars. The Subcommittee will continue to investigate this waste, fraud, and abuse while aiding the Trump Administration’s effort to reevaluate and realign U.S. foreign aid with America-first interests.

More importantly, ain't nobody got time to respond to hundreds, soon to be thousands, of separate lawsuits over every action that Donald Trump takes after being elected to shrink the waste, fraud, and abuse in government.

No.

Some lawyer(s) claiming to represent "unnamed aid workers" are not granted the power under our Constitution to stop the president in his tracks and force him to wait to protect the nation from financial disaster and from violent illegal aliens until the cases wend their way through the courts, whose dockets are already crowded with other frivilous lawsuits brought largely by trial lawyers who are heavy donors to the Democratic Party and their causes.

Nor should they have the power to induce the president to pause his work to respond to each and every one of them. This is a very old legal trick in the United States, to overwhelm the adversary and force them to respond to filing after filing. It's a trick done by lawyers who know that they ultimately have a losing case.

An obscure judge, installed by the political opposition, should not and does not have he power to force the executive to cancel actions because he mouths the catch phrase now in vogue: "likely unconstitutional." They should at least have the guts to say which part of the USC Trump's actions violate and how.

From now on, such lawsuits should not even be responded to in court, until a lower court actually tries to enforce such nonsense. If that happens, the DOJ should immediately file a case with the USSC. If the USSC declines to hear the case, then they can continue to ignore the ruling.

Trump, and other White House officials should take a lesson from Hakeem Jeffries and answer any questions about the latest bullshit filing with "next question."

Trump has humored the last gasp of the lawfare long enough. Time to fully focus on the business of the American people.
Brilliant idea!
 
All those folks an death row got their day in court.

Did the people on that plane?

Now prove that's what they were.

You can't.

Nobody can.

Why?

Because they didn't get their day in court.
Haven't read the law, huh? Didn't think so.
 
That is an 18th street gang picture, Rawley. But you didn't know that till now.
Thanks. I'm not the fan of drug dealing criminal gangs that you are. But good for you for sticking up for them
 
Thanks. I'm not the fan of drug dealing criminal gangs that you are. But good for you for sticking up for them
You pick a random picture thinking your intelligent. You're about as smart as a slug.
 
All those folks an death row got their day in court.

Did the people on that plane?
They got their due process, meaning the process they were due.

When violent drug and human trafficking gangs are unlawfully allowed into the country by a Democrat administration, a quick plane ride to an El Salvadoran prison for terrorists is exactly what they are due.

Jocylen Nungaray didn't get due process, and I've never known you to weep for her. You save your sympathy for violent gang members. And just because that's how badly you wish to get Donald Trump out of your head.
Now prove that's what they were.

You can't.

Nobody can.

Why?

Because they didn't get their day in court.
Prove they did not.
 
The puling, nit-picking, and factually incorrect answers from the left on here, only reinforces that Trump should simply ignore such people, even if they are wearing black robes. Especially if they are wearing the black robes of the Article III branch and are trying run the Article II branch.
 
Back
Top Bottom