Without much commenting on the Holy Father's own Christian Hitler Youth--Old Joe Kennedy had to change his opinion of the Nazi's, himself--Still(?) the question of abortion funding arises, for some reason: Even in the Health Care Debate.
Everyone knows that the imposing of moral scruples even has China to be scorned in debt and business dealings, (American-Style), worldwide!
In KJV, Luke 20, there is the following weird, funny story about Women, childlessness, probably abortion, (7 husbands, no offspring?), and the angelic world:
"27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,
28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.
30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.
31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
32 Last of all the woman died also.
33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection."
Possibly Jewish Jesus could understand the basis problem, and even counter the intellectuals with the status, even of the still-born--another possiblity--and of the barren and sterile--another possibility. They would easily be said "equal unto the angels. . . .," and even under stare decisis kinds of concepts.
So there would even be legal precedent(?), of legality, about it!
One thing is clear. This woman had made it around the block a few times. Still in all, even the still-born, aborted, and flushed down the. . . .the civilized seed have some place in original theology. Theology, it is known in the United States, is not of legal standing: Excepting that the varietals(?) of it are allowed, and for everyone.
So if Jesus can be patient, and apparently this woman, or the guys, can be patient(s): Then how is it that a religious viewpoint without apparent basis can be holding semi-official sway in two federal legislatures?
Even the Reagan Trajectory can approve of an abortion, probably speaking for the Irish(?)--just somehow! "Speaking for the Kenyans," easily no one will say about Ron!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit: Not a coat-hanger, back-alley, kind of. . . .Vision! Luckily(?), my own Indian Name is "Crawling Drunk," not "Coat-hanger Abortion," or some similar name!)
Everyone knows that the imposing of moral scruples even has China to be scorned in debt and business dealings, (American-Style), worldwide!
In KJV, Luke 20, there is the following weird, funny story about Women, childlessness, probably abortion, (7 husbands, no offspring?), and the angelic world:
"27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,
28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.
30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.
31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
32 Last of all the woman died also.
33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection."
Possibly Jewish Jesus could understand the basis problem, and even counter the intellectuals with the status, even of the still-born--another possiblity--and of the barren and sterile--another possibility. They would easily be said "equal unto the angels. . . .," and even under stare decisis kinds of concepts.
So there would even be legal precedent(?), of legality, about it!
One thing is clear. This woman had made it around the block a few times. Still in all, even the still-born, aborted, and flushed down the. . . .the civilized seed have some place in original theology. Theology, it is known in the United States, is not of legal standing: Excepting that the varietals(?) of it are allowed, and for everyone.
So if Jesus can be patient, and apparently this woman, or the guys, can be patient(s): Then how is it that a religious viewpoint without apparent basis can be holding semi-official sway in two federal legislatures?
Even the Reagan Trajectory can approve of an abortion, probably speaking for the Irish(?)--just somehow! "Speaking for the Kenyans," easily no one will say about Ron!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit: Not a coat-hanger, back-alley, kind of. . . .Vision! Luckily(?), my own Indian Name is "Crawling Drunk," not "Coat-hanger Abortion," or some similar name!)
Last edited:
