Conservatives Imposing Religious Views Without That Right!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Without much commenting on the Holy Father's own Christian Hitler Youth--Old Joe Kennedy had to change his opinion of the Nazi's, himself--Still(?) the question of abortion funding arises, for some reason: Even in the Health Care Debate.

Everyone knows that the imposing of moral scruples even has China to be scorned in debt and business dealings, (American-Style), worldwide!

In KJV, Luke 20, there is the following weird, funny story about Women, childlessness, probably abortion, (7 husbands, no offspring?), and the angelic world:

"27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,
28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.
30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.
31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
32 Last of all the woman died also.
33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection."

Possibly Jewish Jesus could understand the basis problem, and even counter the intellectuals with the status, even of the still-born--another possiblity--and of the barren and sterile--another possibility. They would easily be said "equal unto the angels. . . .," and even under stare decisis kinds of concepts.

So there would even be legal precedent(?), of legality, about it!

One thing is clear. This woman had made it around the block a few times. Still in all, even the still-born, aborted, and flushed down the. . . .the civilized seed have some place in original theology. Theology, it is known in the United States, is not of legal standing: Excepting that the varietals(?) of it are allowed, and for everyone.

So if Jesus can be patient, and apparently this woman, or the guys, can be patient(s): Then how is it that a religious viewpoint without apparent basis can be holding semi-official sway in two federal legislatures?

Even the Reagan Trajectory can approve of an abortion, probably speaking for the Irish(?)--just somehow! "Speaking for the Kenyans," easily no one will say about Ron!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit: Not a coat-hanger, back-alley, kind of. . . .Vision! Luckily(?), my own Indian Name is "Crawling Drunk," not "Coat-hanger Abortion," or some similar name!)
 
Last edited:
Without much commenting on the Holy Father's own Christian Hitler Youth--Old Joe Kennedy had to change his opinion of the Nazi's, himself--Still(?) the question of abortion funding arises, for some reason: Even in the Health Care Debate.

Everyone knows that the imposing of moral scruples even has China to be scorned in debt and business dealings, (American-Style), worldwide!

In KJV, Luke 20, there is the following weird, funny story about Women, childlessness, probably abortion, (7 husbands, no offspring?), and the angelic world:

"27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,
28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.
30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.
31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
32 Last of all the woman died also.
33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection."

Possibly Jewish Jesus could understand the basis problem, and even counter the intellectuals with the status, even of the still-born--another possiblity--and of the barren and sterile--another possibility. They would easily be said "equal unto the angels. . . .," and even under stare decisis kinds of concepts.

So there would even be legal precedent(?), of legality, about it!

One thing is clear. This woman had made it around the block a few times. Still in all, even the still-born, aborted, and flushed down the. . . .the civilized seed have some place in original theology. Theology, it is known in the United States, is not of legal standing: Excepting that the varietals(?) of it are allowed, and for everyone.

So if Jesus can be patient, and apparently this woman, or the guys, can be patient(s): Then how is it that a religious viewpoint without apparent basis can be holding semi-official sway in two federal legislatures?

Even the Reagan Trajectory can approve of an abortion, probably speaking for the Irish(?)--just somehow! "Speaking for the Kenyans," easily no one will say about Ron!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit: Not a coat-hanger, back-alley, kind of. . . .Vision! Luckily(?), my own Indian Name is "Crawling Drunk," not "Coat-hanger Abortion," or some similar name!)


Dude, you do know that all of these are just stories. No more no less. Some are good to leave in your subconscious mind in order to steer you from potential disaster; but none, I repeat, NONE of them are THE 'gospel' for there isn't one.
 
Jewish people can tell funny stories. That doesn't mean that repeating them makes people dumb(?), or deaf(?), or even stupid(?)!

Abortion doctors are not stupid, and the clinics are not stupid. And it took a lot of time and patience, in fact, to get them allowed, and even legal.

In my business, I even know they get cleaned.

That should be celebrated in the federal legislatures. Notice that the commentators are not asking the questions: Even about the Chinese, who pay for all the wars--Especially, apparently, if the Democrats have their way, just like the Republicans already did!

Where are the scruples being kept in America!?! Anti-Abortion is heathen stuff, kind of like the Holy Father's Christian Hitler Youth!

The story in Luke 20: Just has to be about more than the woman and her birth control devices, or pills, or whatever. It is probably not just about. . . .rubbers you don't walk around in, if they had those(?)--near the schools!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit--Saved millions from vision-names, in the darkness!)
 
Last edited:
Without much commenting on the Holy Father's own Christian Hitler Youth--Old Joe Kennedy had to change his opinion of the Nazi's, himself--Still(?) the question of abortion funding arises, for some reason: Even in the Health Care Debate.

Everyone knows that the imposing of moral scruples even has China to be scorned in debt and business dealings, (American-Style), worldwide!

In KJV, Luke 20, there is the following weird, funny story about Women, childlessness, probably abortion, (7 husbands, no offspring?), and the angelic world:

"27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,
28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.
30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.
31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.
32 Last of all the woman died also.
33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:
35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection."

Possibly Jewish Jesus could understand the basis problem, and even counter the intellectuals with the status, even of the still-born--another possiblity--and of the barren and sterile--another possibility. They would easily be said "equal unto the angels. . . .," and even under stare decisis kinds of concepts.

So there would even be legal precedent(?), of legality, about it!

One thing is clear. This woman had made it around the block a few times. Still in all, even the still-born, aborted, and flushed down the. . . .the civilized seed have some place in original theology. Theology, it is known in the United States, is not of legal standing: Excepting that the varietals(?) of it are allowed, and for everyone.

So if Jesus can be patient, and apparently this woman, or the guys, can be patient(s): Then how is it that a religious viewpoint without apparent basis can be holding semi-official sway in two federal legislatures?

Even the Reagan Trajectory can approve of an abortion, probably speaking for the Irish(?)--just somehow! "Speaking for the Kenyans," easily no one will say about Ron!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit: Not a coat-hanger, back-alley, kind of. . . .Vision! Luckily(?), my own Indian Name is "Crawling Drunk," not "Coat-hanger Abortion," or some similar name!)

Let me just say this: What in the bloody hell are you babbling about?!
 
Jewish people can tell funny stories. That doesn't mean that repeating them makes people dumb(?), or deaf(?), or even stupid(?)!

Abortion doctors are not stupid, and the clinics are not stupid. And it took a lot of time and patience, in fact, to get them allowed, and even legal.

In my business, I even know they get cleaned.

That should be celebrated in the federal legislatures. Notice that the commentators are not asking the questions: Even about the Chinese, who pay for all the wars--Especially, apparently, if the Democrats have their way, just like the Republicans already did!

Where are the scruples being kept in America!?! Anti-Abortion is heathen stuff, kind of like the Holy Father's Christian Hitler Youth!

The story in Luke 20: Just has to be about more than the woman and her birth control devices, or pills, or whatever. It is probably not just about. . . .rubbers you don't walk around in, if they had those(?)--near the schools!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Entrepreneurial Spirit--Saved millions from vision-names, in the darkness!)

See above, regarding: What the bloody hell are you babbling about?!
 
What indeed is mascale discussing? There are anti-American turd people who are intolerant of other religious viewpoints, and sects, from their own: Who are even against safe abortions, in the health care proposal.

They are wrong, and they have no such right to be wrong, on that hasis.

Some even support the mutilation, dismemberment, disabling, and even outright killing of Americans who are their neighbors, in places like Iraq and Afghanstan, supportive of the basis-free
military incursions into those places. Anyone knows that nomadic herdsmen actually represent no threat to the people of the United States. So people in the United States, supportive of the atrocity of the military incursions, mainly just intend that Americans get mutilated, dismembered, disfigured, disabled, and outright killed there.

With strange people like that running around, apparently there can be no national health plans, complete wih the public option.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, not stirred!"
(Anyone knows how people really are when it comes to the blessings of freedom!)
 
And so everyone is thankful for so much religous diversity, werein Moslems have rights to their ways of life, and Chistians have rights to their ways of life, and "Other" have rights to their ways of life: And it is all funded by China, where people actually make things.

Is it any wonder that some in America can't seem to read even Jesus Christ stories! For them, that would probably be like making something, employed. Wait until they advance to Mohammed, and then to Planned Parenthood! The Moslems, for example, are so intensely committed, that a lot of posters even fear the Moslem nomadic tribesmen in other nations.

So everyone is thankful for federally funded abortions: Or should be, as they gather around the tables of bounty--(for all, they will say it, not meaning what they say)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Actually, Her Majesty's Prime Minister seems to think that NATO should be coming out of Afghanistan in 2010, not going in with additional bribe-supportive personnel, back in their own funded nations!)
 
What indeed is mascale discussing? There are anti-American turd people who are intolerant of other religious viewpoints, and sects, from their own: Who are even against safe abortions, in the health care proposal.

They are wrong, and they have no such right to be wrong, on that hasis.

Abortion isnt a religious issue. Its a human issue. And how on earth can anything that results in the death of someone be safe? May as well safely stab people who disagree with me. I mean who could oppose safely doing that? Its absurd.

Some even support the mutilation, dismemberment, disabling, and even outright killing of Americans who are their neighbors, in places like Iraq and Afghanstan, supportive of the basis-free military incursions into those places. Anyone knows that nomadic herdsmen actually represent no threat to the people of the United States. So people in the United States, supportive of the atrocity of the military incursions, mainly just intend that Americans get mutilated, dismembered, disfigured, disabled, and outright killed there.

So you are saying there are Americans who support our troops being injured in war? Sadly I have to agree. They are those who are trying to keep our troops from finishing the war quickly and trying to hold them back from doing their job.

With strange people like that running around, apparently there can be no national health plans, complete wih the public option.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, not stirred!"
(Anyone knows how people really are when it comes to the blessings of freedom!)

Why on earth would there be a national health plan with public option as long as thinking people exist?
 
Last edited:
And so everyone is thankful for so much religous diversity, werein Moslems have rights to their ways of life, and Chistians have rights to their ways of life, and "Other" have rights to their ways of life: And it is all funded by China, where people actually make things.

No one has a problem with Muslims freely worshiping God. We only have problems with some of them decide they need to try to conquor and kill us in the name of their religion. And we will continually defend ourselves from these people.

As for China's funding of everything. We need to stop that. And spending more money on health care sure isnt going to do that.

Is it any wonder that some in America can't seem to read even Jesus Christ stories! For them, that would probably be like making something, employed. Wait until they advance to Mohammed, and then to Planned Parenthood! The Moslems, for example, are so intensely committed, that a lot of posters even fear the Moslem nomadic tribesmen in other nations.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever.

So everyone is thankful for federally funded abortions: Or should be, as they gather around the tables of bounty--(for all, they will say it, not meaning what they say)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Actually, Her Majesty's Prime Minister seems to think that NATO should be coming out of Afghanistan in 2010, not going in with additional bribe-supportive personnel, back in their own funded nations!)

Again, that doesnt make any sense. English isnt your first language is it?
 
That has to be the dumbest fucking post I have ever seen.

I don't think it's the dumbest......just one of the most pointless.

I think it helps to start out with an opening statement, then go on to proving your point in the body of the post.....and finally a summary to sum up what the point of the post is.
 
Reading that made me want to start downloading porn to watch later.....then I remembered that I got a virus on the computer the last time I did that and I needed to reload all my software and rebuild my PC from the ground up........

I think I'm going to download porn again.......
 
There are anti-American turd people who are intolerant of other religious viewpoints, and sects, from their own: Who are even against safe abortions, in the health care proposal.

Oh nos, not the Turd-people! :eek:
 
Abortion isn't a religious issue. Its a human issue.


This one sentence is all that needs to be stated.

Prohibitions on terminating a life are not just religious doctrines, they are social and societal doctrines.

Killing the unborn is murder...period. You need not be religious to abhor murder.

Someone inevitably makes the argument that as abortion is presently legal, therefore it cannot be murder...but slavery was legal once.

So feel free to make the argument that slavery was ethical and virtuous when it was legal and after I'll be happy to hear your argument on the conscientiousness and moral superiority of abortion.

To the OP, please...in the future, attempt to post more coherently...I don't speak gibberish.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top