Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They want to grill him about why he did not come to the conclusions that they did. He’s not subject to that.
Idiots often disagree with me.And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
Too funny, and wrong.Barr is investigating Dems. That’s obstruction of Justice.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
The democrats turned on Mueller and he and Barr are in their cross hairs.
This is like the Kavanaugh hearing. Their minds are made up. Don't confuse them with facts.
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
Don't be so ridiculous. Congress does not have access to the unredacted report. Barr offered to show the full report to just 12 members of congress (6 Republicans, 6 Democrats) Those select few would be allowed to read the report, but not take any notes. 400+ pages with no notes allowed. That is obstruction of it's self.
What is Mueller hiding? The Trump death camp for gays in Iowa?
Mueller isn't hiding anything. Barr is trying to hide quite a lot.
Barr will be uncovering a coup attempt. Stay tuned
Idiots often disagree with me.And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
~~~~~~
Can you share a link to support your statement?
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
~~~~~~
Can you share a link to support your statement?
I suspect you would reject any specific link I might offer, so Google "500 Ex-DOJ prosecutors" for yourself. There are hundreds of links to the letter, and commentary on it. Pick one you like.
hey West, if that were sooooo true, why didn't Mueller seal an indictment right? I mean, if it's sooooo fking obvious as all these prosecutors say!! I mean......The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
~~~~~~
Can you share a link to support your statement?
I suspect you would reject any specific link I might offer, so Google "500 Ex-DOJ prosecutors" for yourself. There are hundreds of links to the letter, and commentary on it. Pick one you like.
So what. There are THOUSANDS of former Fed prosecutors. It is pretty easy to find anti trump people.
I'm not impressed with appeal to authority fallacies.Idiots often disagree with me.And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
Got it. You are the only one in the parade that is not out of step. I'm so impressed.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
~~~~~~
Can you share a link to support your statement?
I suspect you would reject any specific link I might offer, so Google "500 Ex-DOJ prosecutors" for yourself. There are hundreds of links to the letter, and commentary on it. Pick one you like.
So what. There are THOUSANDS of former Fed prosecutors. It is pretty easy to find anti trump people.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
I'm not impressed with appeal to authority fallacies.Idiots often disagree with me.And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
Got it. You are the only one in the parade that is not out of step. I'm so impressed.
Why do logical fallacies impress you so much, jackass party of slavery supporter?
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.
They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.
The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."
The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
~~~~~~
Can you share a link to support your statement?
I suspect you would reject any specific link I might offer, so Google "500 Ex-DOJ prosecutors" for yourself. There are hundreds of links to the letter, and commentary on it. Pick one you like.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
Yeah cause that .1% will make ALL the difference!!!!!!!
Idiot.
Redacted releases are par for the course. And you know why???
Because the only thing Congress is going to do with it is leak it to the public. That is all they want it for. They don't want the 99.9% report available to key members...who can easily be traced to a leak...they want it available to all members so you can't trace the leak.
Grow up
wow stellar talking points. where did you print them off of?You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”
~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
Yeah cause that .1% will make ALL the difference!!!!!!!
Idiot.
Redacted releases are par for the course. And you know why???
Because the only thing Congress is going to do with it is leak it to the public. That is all they want it for. They don't want the 99.9% report available to key members...who can easily be traced to a leak...they want it available to all members so you can't trace the leak.
Grow up
Your remark might be reasonable if Barr had any credibility, but at this point he has made it clear that he would rather join Rudy in representing Trump than to perform his duty to the country.
