Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only because of the stupidity of allowing the obviously guilty to drag it out.Life in prison is too expensive.Exactly, but if you think that the death sentence doesn't serve any purpose, what do you think should have been done to those who have been executed when the authority people didn't screw up? What kind of sentence would you give a person who would be given the death sentence by everyone else?Knowing now through DNA testing that innocent people have been executed only goes to show that the government are every bit as criminal as the people they execute.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
Life in prison, no parole.
I am not just against the death penalty on a moral basis either. One of my big turning points was when they executed Tim McVeigh. He should have been kept alive so that in time he might have revealed more about the plot. But of course, the powers that be didn't want that, and he wanted to by a martyr.
How much good could have been done with the millions spent to keep the Manson creeps alive?
That is just one example.
It is well known that the death penalty costs more.
I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Only because of the stupidity of allowing the obviously guilty to drag it out.Life in prison is too expensive.Exactly, but if you think that the death sentence doesn't serve any purpose, what do you think should have been done to those who have been executed when the authority people didn't screw up? What kind of sentence would you give a person who would be given the death sentence by everyone else?Knowing now through DNA testing that innocent people have been executed only goes to show that the government are every bit as criminal as the people they execute.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
Life in prison, no parole.
I am not just against the death penalty on a moral basis either. One of my big turning points was when they executed Tim McVeigh. He should have been kept alive so that in time he might have revealed more about the plot. But of course, the powers that be didn't want that, and he wanted to by a martyr.
How much good could have been done with the millions spent to keep the Manson creeps alive?
That is just one example.
It is well known that the death penalty costs more.
Swift and certain capital punishment is hardly as expensive as the life sentence, and for every innocent person executed, and I admit it can happen, there are probably one hundred prison murders committed by lifers.
I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
100% of the time?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
100% of the time?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
There's never been a case of a jury trial that has resulted in an unfair conviction?
I'm afraid I don't share your faith.
Why should a person pay for what they are not guilty of?
Holly
It takes 5 to 8 years for the Federal Government to execute those so convicted, it takes most States 15 to 20 years. That is not due process.Only because of the stupidity of allowing the obviously guilty to drag it out.Life in prison is too expensive.Exactly, but if you think that the death sentence doesn't serve any purpose, what do you think should have been done to those who have been executed when the authority people didn't screw up? What kind of sentence would you give a person who would be given the death sentence by everyone else?
God bless you always!!!
Holly
Life in prison, no parole.
I am not just against the death penalty on a moral basis either. One of my big turning points was when they executed Tim McVeigh. He should have been kept alive so that in time he might have revealed more about the plot. But of course, the powers that be didn't want that, and he wanted to by a martyr.
How much good could have been done with the millions spent to keep the Manson creeps alive?
That is just one example.
It is well known that the death penalty costs more.
Swift and certain capital punishment is hardly as expensive as the life sentence, and for every innocent person executed, and I admit it can happen, there are probably one hundred prison murders committed by lifers.
The only thing that will make the death penalty cheaper is eliminating due process. I am not comfortable with that at all.
So you are bragging you got a guilty man off, and want to lecture us on something?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
You must not have heard about the Innocence Project.
Also, I have sat on a jury a few times. The last time I managed to sway the jury to render a not guilty verdict for a man who was clearly guilty, but I used my right to jury nullification and convinced others to do the same.
It takes 5 to 8 years for the Federal Government to execute those so convicted, it takes most States 15 to 20 years. That is not due process.Only because of the stupidity of allowing the obviously guilty to drag it out.Life in prison is too expensive.Life in prison, no parole.
I am not just against the death penalty on a moral basis either. One of my big turning points was when they executed Tim McVeigh. He should have been kept alive so that in time he might have revealed more about the plot. But of course, the powers that be didn't want that, and he wanted to by a martyr.
How much good could have been done with the millions spent to keep the Manson creeps alive?
That is just one example.
It is well known that the death penalty costs more.
Swift and certain capital punishment is hardly as expensive as the life sentence, and for every innocent person executed, and I admit it can happen, there are probably one hundred prison murders committed by lifers.
The only thing that will make the death penalty cheaper is eliminating due process. I am not comfortable with that at all.
So you are bragging you got a guilty man off, and want to lecture us on something?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
You must not have heard about the Innocence Project.
Also, I have sat on a jury a few times. The last time I managed to sway the jury to render a not guilty verdict for a man who was clearly guilty, but I used my right to jury nullification and convinced others to do the same.
Even at the Federal level, death penalty is more expensive because of legal fees.
Even at the Federal level, death penalty is more expensive because of legal fees.
Then the fix is to streamline the process, not to get rid of the punishment. I would suggest ONE appeal. If the SCOTUS turns it down or fails to overturn the conviction, the criminal gets offed 24 hours later. Quick, simple, less expensive, much better.
So you are bragging you got a guilty man off, and want to lecture us on something?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
You must not have heard about the Innocence Project.
Also, I have sat on a jury a few times. The last time I managed to sway the jury to render a not guilty verdict for a man who was clearly guilty, but I used my right to jury nullification and convinced others to do the same.
Just pointing out that the jury system is not all its cracked up to be. And I didn't think this guy should go to prison over a brick of weed.
Even at the Federal level, death penalty is more expensive because of legal fees.
Then the fix is to streamline the process, not to get rid of the punishment. I would suggest ONE appeal. If the SCOTUS turns it down or fails to overturn the conviction, the criminal gets offed 24 hours later. Quick, simple, less expensive, much better.
What you are talking about is eliminating due process and increasing the risk of innocent people being put to death.
So you are bragging you got a guilty man off, and want to lecture us on something?I trust the state to do many things right.People that don't trust the state to do anything right are nevertheless OK with them deciding who deserves to be executed.
Very odd.
Managing my personal health care is not one of them, but, having served on juries, I trust the jury system to deliver justice.
You must not have heard about the Innocence Project.
Also, I have sat on a jury a few times. The last time I managed to sway the jury to render a not guilty verdict for a man who was clearly guilty, but I used my right to jury nullification and convinced others to do the same.
Just pointing out that the jury system is not all its cracked up to be. And I didn't think this guy should go to prison over a brick of weed.Even at the Federal level, death penalty is more expensive because of legal fees.
Then the fix is to streamline the process, not to get rid of the punishment. I would suggest ONE appeal. If the SCOTUS turns it down or fails to overturn the conviction, the criminal gets offed 24 hours later. Quick, simple, less expensive, much better.
What you are talking about is eliminating due process and increasing the risk of innocent people being put to death.
It can be swift and certain and just.
- Jimmy Wingo | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Murderpedia the encyclopedia of murderers/male.W/w1/wingo-jimmy.htm
Jimmy Wingo and Jimmy L. Glass was convicted of shooting to death Newton and Erline Brown while burglarizing their Dixie Inn home on Christmas Day, 1982.
- Jimmy L. Glass - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_L._Glass
Jimmy L. Glass (c. 1962 – June 12, 1987) was an American convicted murderer, executed by the state of Louisiana. He is probably best known not for his crime, but as ...
