The term "consent" brings forth very sexual intonations, and it can be an issue in sexual dynamics. We've seen it be a major issue with rape claims. A woman claims she never consented to sex she had. We've even seen modern leftists say that if a man and a woman are drunk, the woman isn't able to consent so it's rape.
However, "consent" doesn't just apply to sex, it applies to what happens to your body. And we've established in our society that if you're below the age of 18, you cannot consent. A 17 year old girl can have sex with a man who is 366 days older than his 17th birthday and be convicted of rape. Hell,We've even established when people are too young to get their bodies permanently scarred by a tattoo..
So, given all of this, I think based on precedent (and recent pushback from woke propaganda), it's safe to say that young girl shouldn't be able to "consent" to having her boobs chopped off, nor should a young boy be able to "consent" to having his dick chopped off and a large wound be purposefully inserted between his legs.
I know it takes time for new ideologies to phase out, and our society can be ashamed of what we considered. I mean, we performed lobotomies on people, and assumed babies couldn't feel pain and performed surgery on them without anesthesia. We screw things up as we go along in life inside our culture.
But, I think it's safe to say we know the grooming, convincing, or secret dwelling of a child's gender confusion by parents, school teachers, psychologists, psychiatrists, or doctors is impeding on that person's ability to consent.
As we've heard from feminists and the woke left, "Consent" is king, so truly, they should be on board with rallying with me to fight against those who would violate a person who isn't able to consent.
Am I right?
JoeB131 LOL
