Zone1 I don't care about the epstein files

Status
Not open for further replies.
So its not against the rules for grown men to discuss haviig sex with children? And we also are not allowed to call them what they are?

This discussion does not belong in this thread. As I told you, take it up with the admins. They made the changes. Don't bring it up in this thread again.
 
The term trafficking can be very vague at times. Sending a girl 300 to come across state lines and have sex is considered trafficking. I define trafficking as being forced to do something against your will. I don't think flying out to Epstein island of your own volition meets that standard. I don't doubt some of the parents even knew about it. Legally, children are your property until 18.
So you're good with it....Sleaze.
 
So you're good with it....Sleaze.
Unless you're forcing someone against their will, I don't find the act immoral, no. You don't like it, but that's different from what is right morally. Does your bible forbade it? The quaran explicitly permits marriage to 8yos.
 
It's a waste of time and resources. Most grown men are hebephiles and love young women, generally from the ages of 12 to 17. Fact is, minors can consent at those ages and we can see that with these girls in the files who willingly got on a jet, and flew thousands of miles in the hopes of bettering their lives. Most of those Eastern European girls are already ran through at that age anyways, and been giving it up for a few rubles to the local slavs. He actaully did them a favor, because $200 to rubles back in 2000, that's a lot of money for a teenaged thot. They're not victims; they try and pimp out powerful men, actually. And when they aren't successful, they cry victim to get a payday. But at the end of the day it's quid pro quo. It's a far cry from some man kidnapping you and brutally r@aping a kid in his van. Unless that happens, it's fully consensual.

And of course teens can consent. When I was a kid, I had grown women proposition me. In my mind I agreed, but logistics wouldn't make it happen. But I would have 100% done it if I could. I told my dad and all he said was "you just gotta be careful". If I was a girl, he'd likely be outraged. It's common for fathers to joke and aspire for their male children to have sex with their hot Science teacher. Yet when it comes to girls it's a whole different story; a huge contradiction at best, sexism at worst. Yes, most of this isn't about pedophilia, but about territorialism and dominance. Young girls are seen as property, it really doesn't have anything to do with the morality aspect of it. Everyone wants to f*** someone else's daughter, but no one wants their own daughter to get f*****, you know what I mean?

But, on a biological level, girls were created to be devoured. Literally. The silverback defeats his rivals in combat and is rewarded with is own harem. He makes no distinction between young and old. He did what he needed to do and was rewarded. The same should be the case for men in acquiring wealth and resources. The reward: Young girls. Fertile and in their prime. They were created to be devoured by grown, powerful men. And I don't care. Even the girls don't care, which is why they willingly got flown out to Epstein Island. None of this would be remotely controversial just 100 years ago. You had grown white men singing their hearts out about loving 16 year olds and it made the top 10 billboards lol. It's even common in many countries today(Islamic countries, 8 years old, she's good to go). And we aren't even talking about 8 years old, but basically grown women. People crying about a 16 year old doing what she would otherwise naturally do with other 16 year olds. Hearing grown men decry such things has to be the most feminine, gynocentric stuff I've ever heard. Legalize it and regulate it.



:wtf:
 
It's just booty.

no.

Man's law doesn't dictate what is and isn't moral.

how about human law.

If that was the case, being gay is immoral because it was illegal just a few decades ago.

homosexuality can be found in nature.


The holy Quaran says that 8 years old is Haram.

so? & christian preachers diddle kiddies too. that doesn't make it right.

Who's right.

not you.

Who's wrong.

you are.

You're making an appeal to authority fallacy.

you are trying to justify something that IS against nature. seems you are not doing a good job.
 
Last edited:
I hate Trump, so you're wrong. Though, I don't care that he pimp smakced a young thot after she gave too much teeth lool. I think it;s hilarious, actually.


One thing I do admire about him, though, is that he understands human nature. It's either f%%% or get f*. I wish I could condition myself to not give a f when I'm f** people like they want to f** me, but I often still struggle with it emotionally. Trump doesn't seem to care about those emotions and that's commendable.

ever consider getting yerself checked by a psychiatrist? they would have a field day with you.
 
no.



how about human law.



homosexuality can be found in nature.




so? & christian preachers diddle kiddies too. have diddled kids. that doesn't make it right.



not you.



you are.



you are trying to justify something that IS against nature. seems you are not doing a good job.
You cannot dictate what two consenting individuals do among themselves. That's what we call communism.
 
15th post
It's a waste of time and resources. Most grown men are hebephiles and love young women, generally from the ages of 12 to 17. Fact is, minors can consent at those ages and we can see that with these girls in the files who willingly got on a jet, and flew thousands of miles in the hopes of bettering their lives. Most of those Eastern European girls are already ran through at that age anyways, and been giving it up for a few rubles to the local slavs. He actaully did them a favor, because $200 to rubles back in 2000, that's a lot of money for a teenaged thot. They're not victims; they try and pimp out powerful men, actually. And when they aren't successful, they cry victim to get a payday. But at the end of the day it's quid pro quo. It's a far cry from some man kidnapping you and brutally r@aping a kid in his van. Unless that happens, it's fully consensual.

And of course teens can consent. When I was a kid, I had grown women proposition me. In my mind I agreed, but logistics wouldn't make it happen. But I would have 100% done it if I could. I told my dad and all he said was "you just gotta be careful". If I was a girl, he'd likely be outraged. It's common for fathers to joke and aspire for their male children to have sex with their hot Science teacher. Yet when it comes to girls it's a whole different story; a huge contradiction at best, sexism at worst. Yes, most of this isn't about pedophilia, but about territorialism and dominance. Young girls are seen as property, it really doesn't have anything to do with the morality aspect of it. Everyone wants to f*** someone else's daughter, but no one wants their own daughter to get f*****, you know what I mean?

But, on a biological level, girls were created to be devoured. Literally. The silverback defeats his rivals in combat and is rewarded with is own harem. He makes no distinction between young and old. He did what he needed to do and was rewarded. The same should be the case for men in acquiring wealth and resources. The reward: Young girls. Fertile and in their prime. They were created to be devoured by grown, powerful men. And I don't care. Even the girls don't care, which is why they willingly got flown out to Epstein Island. None of this would be remotely controversial just 100 years ago. You had grown white men singing their hearts out about loving 16 year olds and it made the top 10 billboards lol. It's even common in many countries today(Islamic countries, 8 years old, she's good to go). And we aren't even talking about 8 years old, but basically grown women. People crying about a 16 year old doing what she would otherwise naturally do with other 16 year olds. Hearing grown men decry such things has to be the most feminine, gynocentric stuff I've ever heard. Legalize it and regulate it.


I knew some really horny 17 and 16 year old girls when I was in school.
Those obsessed with the Epstein files just want to use them for political advantage, nothing else.
There's actually nothing wrong with a man liking girls.
 
I knew some really horny 17 and 16 year old girls when I was in school.
Those obsessed with the Epstein files just want to use them for political advantage, nothing else.
There's actually nothing wrong with a man liking girls.
Based. I think it's a conspiracy. Those with power tell us what we can't do, but in the shadows they take all the spoils for themselves. Who isn't in the files, is the real question. And, yes, as a 13 year old, I was deranged. But some wokie out there is going to tell me that I couldn't give consent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom