Zone1 I don't care about the epstein files

[TNHarley]

I knew some really horny 17 and 16 year old girls when I was in school.
Those obsessed with the Epstein files just want to use them for political advantage, nothing else.
There's actually nothing wrong with a man liking girls.

There is nothing wrong with grown men flying random children around on his private jet?
You see nothing wrong with this?

The epstein ordeal is not political. Political hacks make it political.
What about this one? Notice the dead child in the bathtub?

That is not political.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Based. I think it's a conspiracy. Those with power tell us what we can't do, but in the shadows they take all the spoils for themselves. Who isn't in the files, is the real question. And, yes, as a 13 year old, I was deranged. But some wokie out there is going to tell me that I couldn't give consent.

They really only care if it can bring someone they don't like who is on the other side down. Whichever way the wind blows on morality for them.

 

[Chuz Life]

Yep, it's enough to make you want to puke coat-hangers.

The ignore list/ function doesn't offer as much relief as a good puking might, but it will have to do.

 

[Blisterfinger]

There is nothing wrong with grown men flying random children around on his private jet?
You see nothing wrong with this?
View attachment 1223924

The epstein ordeal is not political. Political hacks make it political.
What about this one? Notice the dead child in the bathtub?
View attachment 1223925
That is not political.

There is nothing wrong with grown men flying random children around on his private jet?
You see nothing wrong with this?

Not anything like what I said. Stop putting words in my mouth, it makes me think you're a real fuckingcoward.

The epstein ordeal is not political. Political hacks make it political.
What about this one? Notice the dead child in the bathtub?

It's all political. You guys wait until Biden is gone and then start worrying about it because you don't want to damage your own party. You just want to damage Trump

 

[TNHarley]

Not anything like what I said. Stop putting words in my mouth, it makes me think you're a real fuckingcoward.

It's all political. You guys wait until Biden is gone and then start worrying about it because you don't want to damage your own party. You just want to damage Trump

I didnt put anything in your mouth. You certainly implied it.
Its also funny you say that and then say im a democrat. Im nowhere near a democrat. I hate democrats. I am wayyyy far right.
Child trafficking and having sex with children isnt political you freaking retard. YOU are literally making it political. Right now.
Get some awareness. Then stop acting like this epstein ordeal is not a big deal. It makes you look like a freaking scumbag.
Just some advice.

 

[Kruska]

Most men are naturally hebephiles.

"most man" - you mean YOU and other pedophiles.

When man during Victorian times - married 14 year old's, there were no laws forbidding such a matter or union.
Aristocrats also didn't face the law to the extend as a commoner did. One of the reasons for the American war of independence.

Neither did such laws exist in the middle-ages or before - however they put you on the stake for sacrilege.

We are now living in the 21st century and we HAVE laws (valid for everyone) - e.g. forbidding sex with under-aged.
So if you object to such laws - feel free to change them - or face prison.

The only "political" aspect is that it has become obvious since millennials, that laws are not applied equally.

Anyway it's obvious to me that the purpose of this thread, is to justify TACO's actions, those of others, and the withholding of "evidence" by the DOJ and FBI.

You are basically stating, that man love sports-cars, like to drive fast - therefore speed-limits are a ruse - and certainly not valid for rich men.

 

[Blisterfinger]

I didnt put anything in your mouth. You certainly implied it.
Its also funny you say that and then say im a democrat. Im nowhere near a democrat. I hate democrats. I am wayyyy far right.
Child trafficking and having sex with children isnt political you freaking retard. YOU are literally making it political. Right now.
Get some awareness. Then stop acting like this epstein ordeal is not a big deal. It makes you look like a freaking scumbag.
Just some advice.

Not really, that is nowhere near what I said. You just made some shit up
I don't need your advice either freak

 

[TNHarley]

Not really, that is nowhere near what I said. You just made some shit up
I don't need your advice either freak

If you say so.

 

[WeThePeople123]

When man during Victorian times - married 14 year old's, there were no laws forbidding such a matter or union.

You just proved my point. Without the existence of laws, the true preference of men is all too transparent. What we have today doesn't reflect the true preferences of men. But there are plenty of clues. Hence, why 18 year old xxx is ubiquitous. So you're telling me if we changed the laws, 18 is really the lowest age category that men would prefer?? Get the heck atta here!!!!!! I simply state facts and you don't like it. Not a single one of you have given me a logical and moral argument as to why such a preference is wrong. There isn't any other than YOU DON"T LIKE IT. Men see women as property, so it's natural for you to feel this way. But you have to be honest that it's nothing more than that. Maybe I think 18-30 is too young. Most people have dated others in that age range. So if I decide that I feel that anyone who does date in that range is a pedophile, making you a criminal overnight, do you think that that is legitimate? You'd certainly oppose.

 

[Natural Citizen]

deeek.

I've only seen one other person use that term on here.

I couldn't remember who, so I performed a search...

Search results for query: deek

www.usmessageboard.com

The holy Quaran says that 8 years old is Haram.

Clever spin. Amateur, but clever. For around here anyway, if the strategy suits one's intent.

 

[Chuz Life]

I've only seen one other person use that term on here.

I couldn't remember who, so I performed a search...

Search results for query: deek

www.usmessageboard.com

Thanks for bolstering my prior suspicions.

 

[WeThePeople123]

e.




Clever spin. Amateur, but clever. For around here anyway, if the strategy suits one's intent.

Different cultures have different values. Who's right? Who's wrong? What you talkin' bout, those Afghani farmers ain't tryna hear nun a dat. They would probably kill you if you said they and Muhammad was a pedophile. And if you were born in that society you'd think the exact same way. Why put ass on a pedestal? It's just booty.

 

[Blisterfinger]

If you say so.

I do

 

[Kruska]

You just proved my point. Without the existence of laws, the true preference of men is all too transparent. What we have today doesn't reflect the true preferences of men. But there are plenty of clues. Hence, why 18 year old xxx is ubiquitous. So you're telling me if we changed the laws, 18 is really the lowest age category that men would prefer?? Get the heck atta here!!!!!! I simply state facts and you don't like it. Not a single one of you have given me a logical and moral argument as to why such a preference is wrong. There isn't any other than YOU DON"T LIKE IT. Men see women as property, so it's natural for you to feel this way. But you have to be honest that it's nothing more than that. Maybe I think 18-30 is too young. Most people have dated others in that age range. So if I decide that I feel that anyone who does date in that range is a pedophile, making you a criminal overnight, do you think that that is legitimate? You'd certainly oppose.

You keep talking and ranting - solely about YOURSELF and pedophiles - with no proof whatsoever that YOUR claims about man would be in anyway correct. Luckily for the respective person, I have NEVER come across a grown man, who would have stated that he finds having sex with a 12,13,14,15 year's old girl appropriate, justified or natural.

Just because a 12 to 15 year old girl "might" have the organic ability to reproduce - doesn't mean she has the mental requirements that would allow for her to realize and handle the consequences. - therefore the term "underage". Same goes for drinking alcohol.

In many European countries, sex between minors (14 and 18) are legally permitted. As well as sex between an e.g. 14 year old girl and a 30 year old man. (mutual consent) - however the 14 year old girl will be subject to evaluating her sexual self-determination ability.
YOU came up with 12 year olds.!! your a Muslim??

I also have never seen women as being a property. Human beings are NOT a property you daft wanker.

The only freaks (if you ain't a pedophile) who talk like you, are those Lefty/Libs who don't care about a societies MORALS & LAWS and Muslims who entered Western societies.

As I stated before - you don't like a LAW - change it, or face prison.

 

[WeThePeople123]

You keep talking and ranting - solely about YOURSELF and pedophiles - with no proof whatsoever that YOUR claims about man would be in anyway correct. Luckily for the respective person, I have NEVER come across a grown man, who would have stated that he finds having sex with a 12,13,14,15 year's old girl appropriate, justified or natural.

Just because a 12 to 15 year old girl "might" have the organic ability to reproduce - doesn't mean she has the mental requirements that would allow for her to realize and handle the consequences. - therefore the term "underage". Same goes for drinking alcohol.

In many European countries, sex between minors (14 and 18) are legally permitted. As well as sex between an e.g. 14 year old girl and a 30 year old man. (mutual consent) - however the 14 year old girl will be subject to evaluating her sexual self-determination ability.
YOU came up with 12 year olds.!! your a Muslim??

I also have never seen women as being a property. Human beings are NOT a property you daft wanker.

The only freaks (if you ain't a pedophile) who talk like you, are those Lefty/Libs who don't care about a societies MORALS & LAWS and Muslims who entered Western societies.

As I stated before - you don't like a LAW - change it, or face prison.

lol why would he. You'd cancel him. Most men just hide it.


There are no mental requirements to have sex. Sex is not that complicated: The man takes his penis, inserts it into the vagina, and he ejaculates. Whatever moral attributes you're ascribing to it really has no relevance.

If she's old enough to kill someone in a car accident, she's mature enough to make her own choices in regards to sex. And you still haven't told me how your logic doesn't completely fail when you consider the fact that she's already having sex with people her age.

Yea, get that gynocentric feminine energy out you, bud. It's just booty.

 

[IM2]

If Biden were in these files, the OP would care.

 

[Kruska]

If Biden were in these files, the OP would care.

No he wouldn't - he's just a sex-driven person, with no constrains and morals. Aka a perfect example of a pedophile and harboring the instincts of an animal.
Epstein would use the same arguments as he forwards.

 

[playtime]

I'm talking about the teenagers in the Epstein files. At 16, shoot, she grown.

you do understand that the majority, if not all - were threatened in one kind of way or the other? seems to me that is being forced.

anyhoo - are you a bot? you are way over the top with yer opining & justification.

'fess up.

 

[playtime]

I didnt put anything in your mouth. You certainly implied it.
Its also funny you say that and then say im a democrat. Im nowhere near a democrat. I hate democrats. I am wayyyy far right.
Child trafficking and having sex with children isnt political you freaking retard. YOU are literally making it political. Right now.
Get some awareness. Then stop acting like this epstein ordeal is not a big deal. It makes you look like a freaking scumbag.
Just some advice.

amen.

 

[playtime]

Who's right?

still not you.

Who's wrong?

still you.