One would think all Americans would see the deception, when ZERO newspapers support Trump...but one would be wrong.
From Charles Hugh Smith today...
In a parallel fashion, Donald Trump’s campaign succeeded despite the active resistance of the Republican Party establishment. By some accounts, Trump’s campaign has received more small donations than any other recent Republican candidate.
As for Mainstream Media bias: Bernie was fortunate to only be blacked out, Soviet style; Trump has zero MSM newspaper endorsements and has been subjected to MSM bias that is laughably ham-handed, reminiscent of old-style Communist “running dogs of Imperialism” propaganda.
Fact is, Trump is being endorsed by somewhere less than 10 large newspapers across the country. Yes, a large amount of newspapers across the country are owned by the same group, like Cox or NewsCorp, but it is very telling that he can't get more support than that.
Top Newspaper Companies: Media Ownership Database - Project for Excellence In Journalism
These Are the Only 6 Newspapers in the Country to Endorse Donald Trump
Thank you, Lewdog. But we are still early into the bombshell of the latest news. There's more days ahead of us. The fact remains, more people are getting disgusted with Hillary and her Crime Family.
Are the newspapers independent from their owners when it comes to OP ED features?
Sure some might write an OP-ed with independent thoughts, but most newspapers still remain leaned to what the owner wants them to write.
I'm sorry to be so negative, but I'm old enough that I've seen this story before, and nothing happens. Heck as much as I liked Reagan, he got away with dealing drugs and selling guns illegally, and then got Ollie North to be the stooge and lie for him. Nothing happened. Ollie North became an American hero. Reagan is viewed as one of the most popular Presidents of all time. Clinton lied under oath. Only something that would be considered ceremonial happened, nothing legal, and many Democrats view him as one of the best Presidents of all time. They are rich politicians... nothing ever happens. Period.
You`re right. No one was accountable for the 4,500 soldiers who died looking for wmds after the inspectors found none. Those bodies are under the rug forever.
Here's the thing, me and you will disagree on this. The people that are really at fault for that is a small circle. First you have to blame the defector Iraqi scientist that lied to the CIA. Then you have to blame the CIA and military leaders for not doing better investigations beyond taking that guy's word for it. It is hard to blame GWB, because he was depending on the recommendations and reporting of things from his military leaders and the CIA.
On a side note, there was an online quiz where you answered questions and it said what President you would most be like. Mine came out to be Bush Sr. I thought that was pretty odd, especially sense he was one of the few one term Presidents. But the explanation made sense, because he was a moderate Republican, and that made him seem weak, and that cost him his re-election.