Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
That phrase separates diplomats and their families from those granted birthright citizenship. It is critical rather than superfluous. Diplomat's children are not granted citizenship. They are the exception to the rule. They have to be mentioned as not being subject to the jurisdiction thereof.Are they?
Your interpretation boils down to "All persons born or naturalized in the United Statesand subject to the jurisdiction thereof,are citizens of the United States" All you have to do is be born in the United States to be a citizen, right?
Your interpretation makes the entire phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" superfluous. The most basic tenet of statutory interpretation is that words in a law have meaning. In your interpretation, those words have absolutely no meaning.
I appreciate your attempt at reasoning, but alas, you are wrong still.