Birthright Citizenship…Arguments to begin this week at the Supreme Court.

[Unkotare]

Just How Does an Anchor Baby Anchor the Illegal Alien Parent?

A reader asked: "Just what is the mechanism that allows an anchor baby to keep his or her illegal alien parents in the U.S.?"There are four different mechanisms at work here, as my CIS colleague, Jon Feere, and I see it:

cis.org

By David North on January 16, 2011

 

[bendog]

I thought they heard arguments back on May 15?

And you are correct. lol

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/15/nx-s1-5398025/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship

Although for some reason, Team Trump focused on injunctions rather than on the merits or lack of merits.

 

[d0gbreath]

Agreed. We need interpretation based on original intent.

That is actually impossible to surmise. Guessing, I suppose?

 

[Delldude]

I thought they heard arguments back on May 15?

That was on TROs I think.

 

[Foxfyre]

That is actually impossible to surmise. Guessing, I suppose?

Not if you've had any competent education at all.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And you are correct. lol

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/15/nx-s1-5398025/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship

Although for some reason, Team Trump focused on injunctions rather than on the merits or lack of merits.

Do we know when the hearing on the case is? I did not see it in the article.

 

[d0gbreath]

Not if you've had any competent education at all.

I've had some. Their intent was that babies born in this country are US citizens.

 

[Foxfyre]

I've had some. Their intent was that babies born in this country are US citizens.

If you think that was the original intent,
a) You've had no education in the founding documents
b) You've had no education in competent legal opinion
c) You've had no education in Constitution and what the original intent of each clause/amendment was at the time it was ratified.

 

[Robert W]

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

This is a fact. Rudy came to my office one day. We got to chatting about illegal aliens, and what would Rudy do about them.
The facts are when Rudy came to the USA he was an illegal alien.

Can you see why I asked him his opinion?
Rudy told me to export them back to where they came from.

See Rudy now is a citizen of the USA and he gets it.

 

[Rogue AI]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands. Congress and a president needs to amend the constitution. No, I don’t believe you should automatically be given birth right citizenship if neither one of your parents are American citizens.

As it stands the Congress was responsible for the 14th. They did nothing, leaving only those charged with enforcing the laws with the authority to interpret the intent.

 

[d0gbreath]

If you think that was the original intent,
a) You've had no education in the founding documents
b) You've had no education in competent legal opinion
c) You've had no education in Constitution and what the original intent of each clause/amendment was at the time it was ratified.

Blah, blah blah.
I can read and completely understand what the 14th clearly states.

 

[bendog]

Do we know when the hearing on the case is? I did not see it in the article.

They had the argument on May 15th (or thereabouts). The decision should be this summer.

Betting money couple of weeks ago was that a majority of 5 would pass on the merits of the citizenship clause, but shoot down Trump's bid to end nationwide injunctions. Trump's lawyer couldn't answer questions by keggers and others, and he actually argued that Trump should determine what the 14th and all of the BOR means.

 

[Rogue AI]

That is actually impossible to surmise. Guessing, I suppose?

Not at all. Look to the Indians. They were on American soil and not granted birthright citizenship, why should illegals magically qualify?

 

[bendog]

Not at all. Look to the Indians. They were on American soil and not granted birthright citizenship, why should illegals magically qualify?

IF you actually read the writings by the drafters, you'd be able to answer your own question. See how this works?!

 

[Zincwarrior]

OK so June 5 is the next day scheduled for issuing decisions, with other decision days to be scheduled for the remainder of the month. Case is Trump vs. CASA FYI.

 

[Care4all]

Why not?

Because it simply is not what the amendment explicitly says.

An amendment to it is what is needed for us to change it.

Only these people were NOT subject to our government's jurisdiction at the time:

1. Foreign- Diplomats, Ambassadors, and Royalty itself, with Diplomatic Immunity under international laws and their family residing with them.


2. Native Americans on Reservations with Treaties giving the Native Americans autonomy to Rule and govern themselves,

they have their own governing jurisdiction on their reservation with the Natives.


3. Foreign national enemies of war, and their family members (during wartime)


Everyone else was under our jurisdiction, under our laws of the land.

You are even now to this day, labeling these crossers, ILLEGALS....because under the law these crossers on our soil, are under our laws and under our laws, they are crossing illegally, no? They are under our jurisdiction for them to be, so called illegals....

 

[Rogue AI]

IF you actually read the writings by the drafters, you'd be able to answer your own question. See how this works?!

I don't lack understanding, the actual governance backs my position, not some petty 'argument'. Try harder.

 

[WEATHER53]

I've had some. Their intent was that babies born in this country are US citizens.

Since it was not addressed then just the opposite intent is evident. Your feeling, my fact

 

[Etymology gaslight]

SUPREME COURT TO FINALLY HEAR ARGUMENTS ON THE ANCHOR BABY SCOURGE​

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

Supreme Court to Finally Hear Arguments on the Anchor Baby Scourge - League of Power

After decades of deliberate ethnic cleansing against the American people, the US Supreme Court will finally hear arguments this week about our nation’s insane “anchor baby” policy. The Democrats’ ethnic cleansing lawfare teams are trying to stop President Donald Trump’s executive order to end...

www.lopmatrix.com

Begins and ends
with the grandfather clause.

 

[d0gbreath]

Not at all. Look to the Indians. They were on American soil and not granted birthright citizenship, why should illegals magically qualify?

The American Indians didn't want US citizenship. So, there's that.