Biden gets favorability bump after convention, from 40 to 45% (Trump at 32%)

[playtime]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

It's the price of you having no intellectual integrity and using anti-Trump sources. No one with a brain would believe you. You're a prosecutor making a case making a lame attempt to present yourself as someone who cares about truth when you don't remotely care about truth, just getting Trump.

Your lack of credibility is your own fault and for that reason

What the dumb ass doesn't realize DNA doean't last that long and on a dress that has not been placed in a protected laboratory it means the DNA IS GONE
yet the dumbass believes another lying woman

they already tested it dumbass ... & now they need to see if there's a match.

are you really this stupid?

“Testing unidentified male DNA on the dress she wore during that assault has become standard operating procedure in these circumstances given the remarkable advances in DNA technology, particularly where, as is the case here, other potential contributors have been excluded,” Kaplan added. “As a result, we’ve requested a simple saliva sample from Mr. Trump to test his DNA, and there really is no valid basis for him to object.”
Dress in Hand, Rape Accuser Goes After Trump DNA

They tested it years ago? lol AGAIN DNA IS NOT SAVED ON A DRESS HANGING IN A CLOSET
And then years later find some DNA on it.

they tested it this past january.
what's donny hiding? if it isn't his & he knows it - then he can prove it.
why won't he?

they tested a dress that has been supposedly handing in a closet for decades
THERE IS NO DNA SAMPLE THEY COULD GET why is she lying? to sell books

they already got it & the results say it's male with european descent.
uh-oh..............

because she said they already got it and that is supposed to mean something?
DNA DOESN'T LAST LONG HANDING UP ON CLOTHES IN A CLOSET

wrong. they tested it & all donny hasta do is give a little saliva to prove he's not a rapist.
but he won't.
why not?

Because he doesn't have to.

um - actually he does. he's not above the law & the courts ruled.

1) You don't have to prove yourself innocent in this country, they have to prove you guilty. The law, another subject you have a dearth of knowledge about

2) Trump is not above the law, but you're wrong and he's not below it either

Democrat propaganda is just swimming through your head

ummmm.... this is a civil suit - so the threshold is different than in criminal court.

oh & the judge who said donny hasta cough up his nasty DNA says otherwise & has ruled - so guess that means you're wrong.



tutt tutt.

You think in civil court you have to prove yourself innocent? That's your proof I was wrong that you know nothing about the law? Actually you just proved I was right. The standards are different for that proof, but it's still the burden of the accuser, babe. Sorry

<pffft> take it up with the judge.

‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.

“As a result of that decision, the relevant deadlines in the Court’s Preliminary Conference Order dated December 12, 2020 are no longer ‘temporarily stayed,” the letter sent to Trump attorney Marc Kasowitz notes. “This letter sets forth our understanding of the current status of this case and discovery in this case as a result of the Court’s recent decision.”
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit


sorry.

 

[playtime]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

/----/ " who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life. "
Absolute hog wash.

What's funny is the empty headed Trump hater says she isn't a Democrat, LOL. The stupid shit these people make up

lol.... i'm straight up indie - i've voted for many (R)s, & green party - voted for nader over gore & my own state senator... - & married to one who isn't a trump humping deplorable ... that's the facts. if you voted for trump then 'tis you who are empty headed except for the methane you breathe in from that bubble you made yer home.

You never voted for a Republican in your life. Why do so many mindless Democrats tell that obvious lie? You seriously think that a leftist shill like you claims to vote for Republicans would make an actual Republican vote for Biden? That's just stupid

lol .... whatever you say sweety. i've said it many times & have given names. names i sure as shit wouldn't admit to voting for if i really didn't; since a great deal of them have ended up serving time after getting into office. one is still in federal prison...

i don't give a damn whether you even vote, let alone try to convince your feeble rational for trump humping is wrong.

The only name you gave was Nader. FYI, Nader wasn't a Republican. You really do think not Democrat = Republican, huh?

i never said nader was a (R) you dimbulb... he ran on the green party - in 2000. i voted for him. other than hometown (R)s, pretty much everyone else went to prison - did ralph ever go to prison? i just didn't name THEM.. good god - learn to read.

 

[playtime]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

We'll stop at your first lie
obama was not a constitutional professor
obama was a Senior Lecturer
which is eqvacal to an associate professor
and FYI obama should repay all those students he lectured for failure he spewed their way.

he taught constituional law at harvard.

donny had to shut down his fraudulent university & paid $25,000,000.00 to the dupes he screwed.

Wrong again. He taught at Chicago. He was a student at Harvard

damn, what a tragic mistake - 'eh?

All I said was you got it wrong where he taught. Try to calm down. It was just a factual mistake. You sure are thin skinned that you can't handle being corrected when you get your facts wrong

LOL!!!!! delusion suits you well.

You said Obama taught Constitutional Law at Harvard. I just let you know it was actually Chicago since you kept getting it wrong. You got all upset and started screaming and throwing things. I realize you hate facts, but I didn't use that against your argument, just corrected the fact you kept stating incorrectly. You're so thin skinned, grow up

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....

you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.

 

[kaz]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

/----/ " who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life. "
Absolute hog wash.

What's funny is the empty headed Trump hater says she isn't a Democrat, LOL. The stupid shit these people make up

lol.... i'm straight up indie - i've voted for many (R)s, & green party - voted for nader over gore & my own state senator... - & married to one who isn't a trump humping deplorable ... that's the facts. if you voted for trump then 'tis you who are empty headed except for the methane you breathe in from that bubble you made yer home.

You never voted for a Republican in your life. Why do so many mindless Democrats tell that obvious lie? You seriously think that a leftist shill like you claims to vote for Republicans would make an actual Republican vote for Biden? That's just stupid

lol .... whatever you say sweety. i've said it many times & have given names. names i sure as shit wouldn't admit to voting for if i really didn't; since a great deal of them have ended up serving time after getting into office. one is still in federal prison...

i don't give a damn whether you even vote, let alone try to convince your feeble rational for trump humping is wrong.

The only name you gave was Nader. FYI, Nader wasn't a Republican. You really do think not Democrat = Republican, huh?

i never said nader was a (R) you dimbulb... he ran on the green party - in 2000. i voted for him. other than hometown (R)s, pretty much everyone else went to prison - did ralph ever go to prison? i just didn't name THEM.. good god - learn to read.

I asked what Republicans you voted for and the only name you said was Nader. Then you claim to have named Republicans you voted for

 

[kaz]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

We'll stop at your first lie
obama was not a constitutional professor
obama was a Senior Lecturer
which is eqvacal to an associate professor
and FYI obama should repay all those students he lectured for failure he spewed their way.

he taught constituional law at harvard.

donny had to shut down his fraudulent university & paid $25,000,000.00 to the dupes he screwed.

Wrong again. He taught at Chicago. He was a student at Harvard

damn, what a tragic mistake - 'eh?

All I said was you got it wrong where he taught. Try to calm down. It was just a factual mistake. You sure are thin skinned that you can't handle being corrected when you get your facts wrong

LOL!!!!! delusion suits you well.

You said Obama taught Constitutional Law at Harvard. I just let you know it was actually Chicago since you kept getting it wrong. You got all upset and started screaming and throwing things. I realize you hate facts, but I didn't use that against your argument, just corrected the fact you kept stating incorrectly. You're so thin skinned, grow up

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....

you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.

Another useless Biden humper. And try writing like an adult

 

[playtime]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

/----/ " who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life. "
Absolute hog wash.

What's funny is the empty headed Trump hater says she isn't a Democrat, LOL. The stupid shit these people make up

lol.... i'm straight up indie - i've voted for many (R)s, & green party - voted for nader over gore & my own state senator... - & married to one who isn't a trump humping deplorable ... that's the facts. if you voted for trump then 'tis you who are empty headed except for the methane you breathe in from that bubble you made yer home.

You never voted for a Republican in your life. Why do so many mindless Democrats tell that obvious lie? You seriously think that a leftist shill like you claims to vote for Republicans would make an actual Republican vote for Biden? That's just stupid

lol .... whatever you say sweety. i've said it many times & have given names. names i sure as shit wouldn't admit to voting for if i really didn't; since a great deal of them have ended up serving time after getting into office. one is still in federal prison...

i don't give a damn whether you even vote, let alone try to convince your feeble rational for trump humping is wrong.

The only name you gave was Nader. FYI, Nader wasn't a Republican. You really do think not Democrat = Republican, huh?

i never said nader was a (R) you dimbulb... he ran on the green party - in 2000. i voted for him. other than hometown (R)s, pretty much everyone else went to prison - did ralph ever go to prison? i just didn't name THEM.. good god - learn to read.

I asked what Republicans you voted for and the only name you said was Nader. Then you claim to have named Republicans you voted for

no, i said i've named them before - when i've posted many times that i am not a (D) & have voted the spectrum... like here - post 289. it's just easier to repost.

Will Pelosi Send Impeachment to the Senate ?

 

[playtime]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

We'll stop at your first lie
obama was not a constitutional professor
obama was a Senior Lecturer
which is eqvacal to an associate professor
and FYI obama should repay all those students he lectured for failure he spewed their way.

he taught constituional law at harvard.

donny had to shut down his fraudulent university & paid $25,000,000.00 to the dupes he screwed.

Wrong again. He taught at Chicago. He was a student at Harvard

damn, what a tragic mistake - 'eh?

All I said was you got it wrong where he taught. Try to calm down. It was just a factual mistake. You sure are thin skinned that you can't handle being corrected when you get your facts wrong

LOL!!!!! delusion suits you well.

You said Obama taught Constitutional Law at Harvard. I just let you know it was actually Chicago since you kept getting it wrong. You got all upset and started screaming and throwing things. I realize you hate facts, but I didn't use that against your argument, just corrected the fact you kept stating incorrectly. You're so thin skinned, grow up

wtf? LOL!!!!!!!!!!! only in yer mind.... lol.... you silly. hate facts? i've posted facts & some with links - you show nothing but being a trump humper... it didn't go un noticed how you just walked on by when i gave you cold hard facts about donny....

you amuse me at best, & i pity you at worst.

Another useless Biden humper. And try writing like an adult

uh-huh ... yep you're outa gas.

thanx for playing... & get some originality you you're amusement starts to get boring....

 

[kaz]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

/----/ " who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life. "
Absolute hog wash.

What's funny is the empty headed Trump hater says she isn't a Democrat, LOL. The stupid shit these people make up

lol.... i'm straight up indie - i've voted for many (R)s, & green party - voted for nader over gore & my own state senator... - & married to one who isn't a trump humping deplorable ... that's the facts. if you voted for trump then 'tis you who are empty headed except for the methane you breathe in from that bubble you made yer home.

You never voted for a Republican in your life. Why do so many mindless Democrats tell that obvious lie? You seriously think that a leftist shill like you claims to vote for Republicans would make an actual Republican vote for Biden? That's just stupid

lol .... whatever you say sweety. i've said it many times & have given names. names i sure as shit wouldn't admit to voting for if i really didn't; since a great deal of them have ended up serving time after getting into office. one is still in federal prison...

i don't give a damn whether you even vote, let alone try to convince your feeble rational for trump humping is wrong.

The only name you gave was Nader. FYI, Nader wasn't a Republican. You really do think not Democrat = Republican, huh?

i never said nader was a (R) you dimbulb... he ran on the green party - in 2000. i voted for him. other than hometown (R)s, pretty much everyone else went to prison - did ralph ever go to prison? i just didn't name THEM.. good god - learn to read.

I asked what Republicans you voted for and the only name you said was Nader. Then you claim to have named Republicans you voted for

no, i said i've named them before - when i i've posted many times that i am not a (D) & have voted the spectrum... like here - post 289. it's just easier to repost.

Will Pelosi Send Impeachment to the Senate ?

OK, so a few local Republicans. I raised my kids in Brookfield and the only people in that list I ever heard of was Jody Rell. And Republicans in Connecticut are pretty liberal. Hardly makes you independent.

For me for President since 1992:

Republican 1
Libertarian 4
Green 1
Independent 1

 

[Faun]

Favourability boost?

This is a joke, correct? Like the DNC...

This is not a joke. 17 millions watched RNC last night vs 19.7 millions watched DNC first night 19.7.

Reuters) - A total of 17 million people watched the mostly virtual Republican National Convention's first night on Monday, according to Nielsen, fewer than the 19.7 million viewers who watched the first night of the Democratic National Convention.

Democrats Beat Republicans in First-Night Convention TV Audience

A total of 17 million people watched the mostly virtual Republican National Convention's first night on Monday, according to Nielsen, fewer than the 19.7 million viewers who watched the first night of the Democratic National Convention.

www.nytimes.com

Good, that's 17 million more voters for president Trump.

And according to your logic, 20 million more voters for Biden.

 

[Faun]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

 

[Gaeandilth]

That is all right keep getting your hopes up. I want you for sure you are going to win. Just like 2016 and I will be entertained on election night against watching grown men cry on live tv(van jones). I mean listening to you people get angry all the time is semi entertaining but the tears are better. Can only watch those crybaby democrat montages so much before they get old need some new material.

 

[Faun]

/——: Theh only pilled 714 random adults, you’d think if Dementia Joe was doing that well they’d have polls of 1,500 likely voters. “

Are you an experienced pollster?

/—-/ I’ve studied polling for years. And if you don’t know the reason for taking polls of random adults I suggest you study them like I did.

How do you suppose to study polls unless you works as a pollsters? If you did you coulda have explained to us here which is fake and not fake. Or how/what/why its fake?

71% of college students plan to vote in 2020—and they heavily prefer Biden over Trump

According to a survey of 4,000 full-time college students 71% are "absolutely certain" they will vote this year and 70% said they would pick Joe Biden.

www.cnbc.com

As the 2020 presidential election nears, college students across the country are facing a fall semester unlike any other. The pandemic has turned their everyday lives upside down, the economic recession has financially wounded them and the most recent wave of the Black Lives Matter movement has pushed them into a new era of activism.

When asked "If you were to cast your vote today, for whom would you vote?" 70% of those surveyed said they would pick former Vice President Biden and only 18% of students said they would pick President Donald Trump. A significant 81% of those surveyed said they have an unfavorable view of Trump.

/---/ I don't know if you read the article on how political polling works, but here is one released today sampling LIKELY Voters - those most likely to show up on election day and vote -- or mail in a ballot. This is opposed to Random Adult polling that samples people who may or may not be eligible to vote, may or may not be registered or are foreign tourists.

Mr. Trump had a 48% approval rating and a 52% disapproval rating among likely voters in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, according to the polling from CNBC/Change Research.

Oh? What's the purpose of polling likely voters in a job approval poll? You think the opinion of non-likely voters shouldn't count?

 

[Faun]

Well here's what we were looking for. Did Biden get a bump from the convention?

Prior to the convention, Biden had a net negative favorability rating, with slightly more Americans having an unfavorable view of the former vice president than a favorable one. In the days after the convention, Biden's favorability ticked up from 40% just over a week ago to 45% in the new poll, which was conducted using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel.

Biden enjoys post-convention bump in favorability: POLL

The Democratic National Convention, with a smaller audience than 2016, still delivered a favorability boost for Joe Biden, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds.

abcnews.go.com

The question is how can 33% of people approve of Trump.
But I understand Hitler had a 30% approval rate in Germany after WWWII.
There are a lot of stupid, sick people in the world. One is our President.

Democrats, uniting the country! LOL. Douche

Republicans are dividing our country, it began with Gingrich and Delay, and has continued for decades. Trump, however, has trumped their decades long effort into making the Pledge of Allegiance a mockery.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

We are no longer one nation, we are no longer indivisible, and we have never ever provided liberty and justice for all. Donald Trump has made sure we will be divided as long as he remains President; his call for law and order is hateful rhetoric when he eliminated a critical word: JUSTICE!

grow up kid you don't get rewarded for misbehaving. how do you feel about Biden's bill that locked blacks up? Harris aggressively locking blacks up and laughing about doing it. Fighting to keep innocent people in prison? Is that the justice you believe in?

It's not my opinion and it's not Biden's either. Trump's idea is to listen to and applaud his base who chant "lock her up" without the her being arrested, indicted and convicted. And Trump's base who support a felon who twice admitted guilt and because he is a friend of Trump and his lap dog Barr is seeking to exonerate Flynn.

That's not justice to me, I suppose it is to you.

steve bannon is CONvict # 10 that was within donny's orbit.

LO!!! ' the law & order president '

Pussygrabber's administration is a criminal enterprise, even his retired judge sister despises him...

And yet you voted for a rapist ... twice ...

...and of course among the plethora of crimes by pussygrabber, 25 victims of sexual abuse/rape.....


View attachment 379018

Evidence? You don't need no estinking evidence! You hate the guy and believe any accusation. Got it

<ahem>

'Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
Colin KalmbacherAug 10th, 2020, 5:34 pm

President Donald Trump was given a series of deadlines to produce his DNA and other evidence as part of mandatory discovery in an ongoing defamation lawsuit on Monday.

E. Jean Carroll is an author and Elle advice columnist who accused the 45th president of raping her sometime in late 1995 or early 1996. She initially made that accusation—one of over 20 sexual assault allegations against Trump—during the summer of 2019. Trump later denied the accusation in an interview with The Hill and Caroll subsequently sued for defamation in New York.

A letter sent by Carroll’s attorneys notes that prior deadlines for the production of the DNA evidence were put on hold by an appeals court pending the outcome of a decision in a similar case filed by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos–who alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in 2007.
[...]
The letter also rubs Trump’s nose in the Vance decision:

Because the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that Presidents are not exempt from giving testimony in civil cases, we fully expect that Defendant will testify in a timely manner. President Clinton made time to testify under oath about allegations of sexual harassment, and so President Trump can surely make time to testify about allegations of sexual assault and defamation. His testimony about what he did (and what he said) will strike to the very heart of the case and offer evidence that cannot be obtained from any other sources. He is obviously required to provide it.
[...]
‘Obviously Required to Provide It’: Trump Given Deadlines to Produce DNA in E. Jean Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit

an author trying to sell books imgin that

she's claiming to have saved her dress & it has donny's dna on it.

why is donny fighting like hell not to give a little sample? it shirley would clear him, toot sweet. & if he's innocent - it could have been over with months ago; yet it isn't.


hmmmmmm.................... curious that

sure she did an author trying to sell a book you leftists have totally lost your minds

oh please.

that doesn't explain why donny is scared to give up something that would clear him. perhaps he's guilty ..... ya............ that's the ticket.

what was obama school grades? if records of school grades were so important to you now why not back them?
The President is playing obama's game and now you don't like it.

& obama - a harvard, constitutional professor, wouldn't have gotten that gig & kept it if he was as dotarded as donny - - - who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life.

View attachment 379185

/----/ " who had a rich daddy paying his way all thru life. "
Absolute hog wash.

What's funny is the empty headed Trump hater says she isn't a Democrat, LOL. The stupid shit these people make up

lol.... i'm straight up indie - i've voted for many (R)s, & green party - voted for nader over gore & my own state senator... - & married to one who isn't a trump humping deplorable ... that's the facts. if you voted for trump then 'tis you who are empty headed except for the methane you breathe in from that bubble you made yer home.

You never voted for a Republican in your life. Why do so many mindless Democrats tell that obvious lie? You seriously think that a leftist shill like you claims to vote for Republicans would make an actual Republican vote for Biden? That's just stupid

lol .... whatever you say sweety. i've said it many times & have given names. names i sure as shit wouldn't admit to voting for if i really didn't; since a great deal of them have ended up serving time after getting into office. one is still in federal prison...

i don't give a damn whether you even vote, let alone try to convince your feeble rational for trump humping is wrong.

The only name you gave was Nader. FYI, Nader wasn't a Republican. You really do think not Democrat = Republican, huh?

i never said nader was a (R) you dimbulb... he ran on the green party - in 2000. i voted for him. other than hometown (R)s, pretty much everyone else went to prison - did ralph ever go to prison? i just didn't name THEM.. good god - learn to read.

Kaz kazzes, i.e., lies. That's what he does.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——: Theh only pilled 714 random adults, you’d think if Dementia Joe was doing that well they’d have polls of 1,500 likely voters. “

Are you an experienced pollster?

/—-/ I’ve studied polling for years. And if you don’t know the reason for taking polls of random adults I suggest you study them like I did.

How do you suppose to study polls unless you works as a pollsters? If you did you coulda have explained to us here which is fake and not fake. Or how/what/why its fake?

71% of college students plan to vote in 2020—and they heavily prefer Biden over Trump

According to a survey of 4,000 full-time college students 71% are "absolutely certain" they will vote this year and 70% said they would pick Joe Biden.

www.cnbc.com

As the 2020 presidential election nears, college students across the country are facing a fall semester unlike any other. The pandemic has turned their everyday lives upside down, the economic recession has financially wounded them and the most recent wave of the Black Lives Matter movement has pushed them into a new era of activism.

When asked "If you were to cast your vote today, for whom would you vote?" 70% of those surveyed said they would pick former Vice President Biden and only 18% of students said they would pick President Donald Trump. A significant 81% of those surveyed said they have an unfavorable view of Trump.

/---/ I don't know if you read the article on how political polling works, but here is one released today sampling LIKELY Voters - those most likely to show up on election day and vote -- or mail in a ballot. This is opposed to Random Adult polling that samples people who may or may not be eligible to vote, may or may not be registered or are foreign tourists.

Mr. Trump had a 48% approval rating and a 52% disapproval rating among likely voters in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, according to the polling from CNBC/Change Research.

Oh? What's the purpose of polling likely voters in a job approval poll? You think the opinion of non-likely voters shouldn't count?

/——-/ Likely voters are the ones who show up to vote. They are engaged and are familiar with the issues. Random Adults are just that, a mix of voters and non voters. Their opinions are not to the level of likely voters otherwise campaigns would rely on them since they are cheaper and faster to take.
Lesson number 2:Understanding Gallup's Likely Voter Procedures for Presidential Elections

 

[Faun]

/——: Theh only pilled 714 random adults, you’d think if Dementia Joe was doing that well they’d have polls of 1,500 likely voters. “

Are you an experienced pollster?

/—-/ I’ve studied polling for years. And if you don’t know the reason for taking polls of random adults I suggest you study them like I did.

How do you suppose to study polls unless you works as a pollsters? If you did you coulda have explained to us here which is fake and not fake. Or how/what/why its fake?

71% of college students plan to vote in 2020—and they heavily prefer Biden over Trump

According to a survey of 4,000 full-time college students 71% are "absolutely certain" they will vote this year and 70% said they would pick Joe Biden.

www.cnbc.com

As the 2020 presidential election nears, college students across the country are facing a fall semester unlike any other. The pandemic has turned their everyday lives upside down, the economic recession has financially wounded them and the most recent wave of the Black Lives Matter movement has pushed them into a new era of activism.

When asked "If you were to cast your vote today, for whom would you vote?" 70% of those surveyed said they would pick former Vice President Biden and only 18% of students said they would pick President Donald Trump. A significant 81% of those surveyed said they have an unfavorable view of Trump.

/---/ I don't know if you read the article on how political polling works, but here is one released today sampling LIKELY Voters - those most likely to show up on election day and vote -- or mail in a ballot. This is opposed to Random Adult polling that samples people who may or may not be eligible to vote, may or may not be registered or are foreign tourists.

Mr. Trump had a 48% approval rating and a 52% disapproval rating among likely voters in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, according to the polling from CNBC/Change Research.

Oh? What's the purpose of polling likely voters in a job approval poll? You think the opinion of non-likely voters shouldn't count?

/——-/ Likely voters are the ones who show up to vote. They are engaged and are familiar with the issues. Random Adults are just that, a mix of voters and non voters. Their opinions are not to the level of likely voters otherwise campaigns would rely on them since they are cheaper and faster to take.
Lesson number 2:Understanding Gallup's Likely Voter Procedures for Presidential Elections

Right, so polling likely voters in an election poll makes complete sense. But you didn't answer my questions ... What's the purpose of polling likely voters in a job approval poll? Why should others not be counted?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

Maps don't show percents, moron.

More sources saying the same thing:

Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win

Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...

www.msnbc.com

HuffPost Forecasts Hillary Clinton Will Win With 323 Electoral Votes

Democrats stand a strong chance of taking control of the Senate as well.

www.huffpost.com

Clinton Has a 99% Probability of Winning the Election | Stanford Predicts

Want to keep denying it?

 

[Faun]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

Maps don't show percents, moron.

More sources saying the same thing:

Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win

Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...

www.msnbc.com

Clinton Has a 99% Probability of Winning the Election | Stanford Predicts

Want to keep denying it?

Idiot, that's what I said. The polls did not show Hillary with a 99% chance. Pollsters and others made claims like that based on nothing but their own personal interpretation of the polls.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

Maps don't show percents, moron.

More sources saying the same thing:

Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win

Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...

www.msnbc.com

Clinton Has a 99% Probability of Winning the Election | Stanford Predicts

Want to keep denying it?

Idiot, that's what I said. The polls did not show Hillary with a 99% chance. Pollsters and others made claims like that based on nothing but their own personal interpretation of the polls.

See post 236 and go suck a cock, dickwad.

 

[Faun]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

Maps don't show percents, moron.

More sources saying the same thing:

Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win

Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...

www.msnbc.com

Clinton Has a 99% Probability of Winning the Election | Stanford Predicts

Want to keep denying it?

Idiot, that's what I said. The polls did not show Hillary with a 99% chance. Pollsters and others made claims like that based on nothing but their own personal interpretation of the polls.

See post 236 and go suck a cock, dickwad.

Sorry, fag, I'm straight, not interested in you. Look for dates elsewhere.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.

You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.

And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.

You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.

There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,

Lie you say?

The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday

The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to win

www.independent.co.uk

Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:

A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump. ​

But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.

Maps don't show percents, moron.

More sources saying the same thing:

Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win

Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...

www.msnbc.com

Clinton Has a 99% Probability of Winning the Election | Stanford Predicts

Want to keep denying it?

Idiot, that's what I said. The polls did not show Hillary with a 99% chance. Pollsters and others made claims like that based on nothing but their own personal interpretation of the polls.

See post 236 and go suck a cock, dickwad.

Sorry, fag, I'm straight, not interested in you. Look for dates elsewhere.

Yea you straight. You straight fucking stupid.

I didn't think you were man enough to admit you were wrong. Presented with overwhelming evidence you resort to name calling. Typical fucking liberal.

Go suck a cock, dickwad.