- Nov 14, 2011
- 119,979
- 60,000
- 2,635
Not a lie, you're just an idiot. The independent.co.uk, which is neither a poll nor a pollster, invented that 99% figure. They based it on:Don't worry, Hillary has a 99% chance of winning according to the polls.
You know what's really funny? When someone lies to me I no longer listen to anything they have to say and I ignore them. The polls lied to liberals in 2016 and instead of ignoring them, they suck them up like they are god all over again. Don't you know Trump supporters and playing games with the polls? I've been polled 3 times and every time I told them I'd be voting for Biden, 100%. And like good little poll takers, they copied down exactly what I'd said.
And I lied through my fucking teeth. And so did every single person in my family who got a call. All said they were voting for Biden. None would vote for Biden on their death bed.
You stupid fucking morons are too dumb to rub two sticks together.
There’s no such thing as 99%. Why do you lie? Don’t worry this election 2020 will be a massive record voter turn out against Trump. That I guarantee you. People lives and life depends on it.,
Lie you say?
The man who predicted 49 out of 50 states in 2012 has said who will win on Tuesday
The Princeton Election Consortium found Ms Clinton has a projected 312 electoral votes across the country and only 270 are needed to winwww.independent.co.uk
A survey from the Princeton Election Consortium has found that Hillary Clinton has a 99 per cent chance of winning the election over Donald Trump.
But if you click on the actual poll they cite, Princeton Election Consortium, you'd see nowhere in there does it indicate Hillary had a 99% chance of winning.
Maps don't show percents, moron.
More sources saying the same thing:
Scientist predicts 99% chance of Clinton win
Lawrence speaks to Princeton’s Sam Wang, who says Hillary Clinton has a greater than 99% chance of winning the presidency & that Democrats have a strong chance of taking the Senate. Josh Barro & Krystal Ball then discuss polls and Clinton’s star-studde...www.msnbc.com
Want to keep denying it?
Idiot, that's what I said. The polls did not show Hillary with a 99% chance. Pollsters and others made claims like that based on nothing but their own personal interpretation of the polls.
See post 236 and go suck a cock, dickwad.
Sorry, fag, I'm straight, not interested in you. Look for dates elsewhere.
Yea you straight. You straight fucking stupid.
I didn't think you were man enough to admit you were wrong. Presented with overwhelming evidence you resort to name calling. Typical fucking liberal.
Go suck a cock, dickwad.
I admit when I'm wrong, faggot. I'm not wrong. The survey did not say Hillary had a 99% chance of winning. You should know that since I posted a link to the survey and nowhere did it speculate on any percentage chance of her winning. As I accurately pointed out, it was others interpreting the survey who made that claim.