Even anti Trump reject Tucker's "apology" he is all about money and clicks

[Thethingsz]

Reminding his racist supremacy (N. Fuentes) and Holocaust denial (D. Cooper) promotion too.

Here is the clip from TheView, today April 21, 2026:



Summary:


Too Late to Say Sorry: The View Torches Tucker Carlson’s ‘Regret’ as Self-Serving Spin.

Here’s a concise summary of that April 21 segment of The View,:

The panel reacts skeptically—often mockingly—to Carlson’s apparent regret over supporting Donald Trump, especially in light of the ongoing Iran conflict. Whoopi Goldberg introduces the clip as a surprising but overdue admission of responsibility, highlighting Carlson’s acknowledgment that he and others helped enable current events.

The hosts largely reject his apology as insincere and opportunistic. Sunny Hostin argues his reversal lacks credibility, pointing to past contradictions—privately criticizing Trump, then publicly supporting and endorsing him. She frames his regret as too little, too late given the stakes.

Joy Behar ridicules Carlson’s track record, accusing him of habitual dishonesty—especially his portrayal of the January 6 attack as harmless. She suggests a real apology would require a full accounting of his misinformation, not a vague expression of regret.

Sara Haines goes further, portraying Carlson (and Megyn Kelly) as driven by clicks, money, and influence rather than truth. She cites his platforming of extremist figures [incl. Holocaust denier Darril Cooper and Hitler-fan Nick Fuentes] and controversial interviews as evidence that he amplifies harmful narratives without accountability.

Alyssa Farah Griffin contrasts genuine political reconsideration with what she sees as Carlson’s calculated rebranding. She characterizes his evolution as a shift toward more extreme, conspiratorial content, arguing his current stance is about relevance and profit—especially after criticism from Trump.

The discussion closes with Goldberg dismissing Carlson’s promotion of conspiracy theories like the “great replacement,” emphasizing that his claims lack factual basis and that his inability to defend them undermines his credibility.

Bottom line: The panel treats Carlson’s apology not as meaningful accountability, but as a self-serving pivot from a figure they describe as consistently misleading, opportunistic, and influential in spreading harmful narratives.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Reminding his racist supremacy (N. Fuentes) and Holocaust denial (D. Cooper) promotion too.

Here is the clip from TheView, today April 21, 2026:



Summary:


Too Late to Say Sorry: The View Torches Tucker Carlson’s ‘Regret’ as Self-Serving Spin.

Here’s a concise summary of that April 21 segment of The View,:

The panel reacts skeptically—often mockingly—to Carlson’s apparent regret over supporting Donald Trump, especially in light of the ongoing Iran conflict. Whoopi Goldberg introduces the clip as a surprising but overdue admission of responsibility, highlighting Carlson’s acknowledgment that he and others helped enable current events.

The hosts largely reject his apology as insincere and opportunistic. Sunny Hostin argues his reversal lacks credibility, pointing to past contradictions—privately criticizing Trump, then publicly supporting and endorsing him. She frames his regret as too little, too late given the stakes.

Joy Behar ridicules Carlson’s track record, accusing him of habitual dishonesty—especially his portrayal of the January 6 attack as harmless. She suggests a real apology would require a full accounting of his misinformation, not a vague expression of regret.

Sara Haines goes further, portraying Carlson (and Megyn Kelly) as driven by clicks, money, and influence rather than truth. She cites his platforming of extremist figures and controversial interviews as evidence that he amplifies harmful narratives without accountability.

Alyssa Farah Griffin contrasts genuine political reconsideration with what she sees as Carlson’s calculated rebranding. She characterizes his evolution as a shift toward more extreme, conspiratorial content, arguing his current stance is about relevance and profit—especially after criticism from Trump.

The discussion closes with Goldberg dismissing Carlson’s promotion of conspiracy theories like the “great replacement,” emphasizing that his claims lack factual basis and that his inability to defend them undermines his credibility.

Bottom line: The panel treats Carlson’s apology not as meaningful accountability, but as a self-serving pivot from a figure they describe as consistently misleading, opportunistic, and influential in spreading harmful narratives.

If you view the View.....ya might not be reliable about anything

 

[Thethingsz]

If you view the View.....

If I sometimes listen to Qatarlson's shit, doesn't mean I believe him.

 

[Lockback]

I was a huge fan of Tucker Carlson.
Emphasis on WAS.
He's totally lost his mind. There's something wrong with him. I wouldn't walk across the street to see him nowadays.