Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is the common law for the common defense:Proof?Which state is it that has a militia?The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
Almost all states.
If you read the state constitution, most say something like that all male adults are automatically part of the militia.
That means they can be called upon at any time, for things like a posse.
But remember back then there were no police, so people were also expected to protect their own possessions.
"Well regulated"?
It does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
When the second amendment was written well-regulated does not mean what it means nowThe United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
Go back to non-English speaking Europe.go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The founders considered the people the militia the government doesn't have right therefore the second amendment does not pertain to government
Since when has that ever mattered to the fucktards that would gladly disarm you?The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
it's not your second amendment MexicanGo back to non-English speaking Europe.go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The founders considered the people the militia the government doesn't have right therefore the second amendment does not pertain to government
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. Our Second Amendment declares well regulated militia a States' sovereign right.
It is not Your Constitution, European. Your ignorance proves it.it's not your second amendment MexicanGo back to non-English speaking Europe.go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The founders considered the people the militia the government doesn't have right therefore the second amendment does not pertain to government
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. Our Second Amendment declares well regulated militia a States' sovereign right.
It's my second amendment
Government has no rights, therefore, it has no second amendment it wasn't written for its protection, it was written as a mandate to the government what they must protect the right of the people.
And well regulated means in working order as to be expected it doesn't mean what you believe it means
The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
Mexican who fucking wrote the U.S. Constitution? where were they fromIt is not Your Constitution, European. Your ignorance proves it.it's not your second amendment MexicanGo back to non-English speaking Europe.go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The founders considered the people the militia the government doesn't have right therefore the second amendment does not pertain to government
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. Our Second Amendment declares well regulated militia a States' sovereign right.
It's my second amendment
Government has no rights, therefore, it has no second amendment it wasn't written for its protection, it was written as a mandate to the government what they must protect the right of the people.
And well regulated means in working order as to be expected it doesn't mean what you believe it means
Our Second Amendment is clear about what is Necessary not Optional to the security of our free States. Learn to read simple American English instead of only understanding European.
FYI those weapons he banned in 94 are now in common use in common use weapons cannot be banned constitutionallyThe United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
So?
We already have that.
It's called the National Guard. Every state has their own National Guard. I volunteered and was a member off the National Guard for my state when I was in my 20s. I have no doubt you never even took the entrance exam much less volunteered to serve our nation.
It is not unconstitutional to ban assault weapons.
Clinton did it when he was president. The law lasted 10 years. The bush boy was president when it ended with the republicans in control of the congress so they didn't renew the law.
Your post screams just how down right stupid and ignorant of the law you are.
No, an AWB would be unconstitutional because the guns banned are in common use and entitled to constitutional protections.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
From English speaking Europe not from where You are from. You need to learn English of the Americas, now.Mexican who fucking wrote the U.S. Constitution? where were they fromIt is not Your Constitution, European. Your ignorance proves it.it's not your second amendment MexicanGo back to non-English speaking Europe.go back to MexicoIt does nothing of the kind; it only proves the right wing has nothing fallacy of appeals to ignorance.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The founders considered the people the militia the government doesn't have right therefore the second amendment does not pertain to government
You have nothing but appeals to ignorance. Our Second Amendment declares well regulated militia a States' sovereign right.
It's my second amendment
Government has no rights, therefore, it has no second amendment it wasn't written for its protection, it was written as a mandate to the government what they must protect the right of the people.
And well regulated means in working order as to be expected it doesn't mean what you believe it means
Our Second Amendment is clear about what is Necessary not Optional to the security of our free States. Learn to read simple American English instead of only understanding European.
Again it's not the bill of need but the Bill of Rights being "Necessary" has no relevance to rights
MEXICAN YOU'RE IGNORANT
"A State Militia must be maintained and well regulated"
E.g.,A "militia" is comprised of civilians whom are NOT under the command of government.
Your quote.....A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined.The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs. "A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
STUPID FUCK. The 2A refers to a right of the PEOPLE, free and clear of the government, to carry and bear arms against the GOVERNMENT, and you think it is the right of the government to carry out armies. Show us where it says that here:
or here:
National Guard (United States) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 478066
Wherein is such a requisite inscribed in law?.. A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle...
The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The individual right to possess a firearm is unconnected with militia service, weapons in common use, such as the AR 15, are protected by the Second Amendment.An Assault weapons ban would take this weapon away from the state citizens, thus negating the right to organize a states militia.
