Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Almost everything we were originally told about George Floyd tragedy turning out not to be the case:
1. In fact, he did resist, at two locations.
2. In fact, the cop did not have his hand in his pocket
3. In fact, he dies of a heart attack, not strangulation or asphyxiation.
4. In fact, he was high on drugs.
5. In fact, he has long criminal history.
How big will the acquittal riot be?
In fact, 4 of your "facts" are irrelevant.
In fact, it doesn't matter if he didn't die of asphyxiation, because it doesn't prevent the knee on the neck from having caused his death.
In fact, the ex-cop won't be acquitted, no matter how much your primitive ass wants to cheer for police brutality.
It does matter, of course. Arrest the cop, try him and let jury decide his fate. That's how justice works.
It doesn't matter, actually, and the reason is in my post. What matters is whether the knee in the neck caused/contributed to his death, not whether or not the specific cause of death was asphyxiation.
And thank you for needlessly advocating "arrest the cop, try him, and let the jury decide" at me, as though I somehow suggested something else.
I does matter. If your attention span is bit longer than of a gold fish, you would notice that my post has nothing to do with a cop's action. Read the first sentence, dunce.
"Almost everything we were originally told about George Floyd tragedy turning out not to be the case". Every single thing I listed is correct, regardless of what cop did.
It doesn't matter. If your comprehension skills hadn't been deleted by your hormone rush, you would notice your post DOES have to do with the cop's action. Read your LAST sentence, dunce.
"How big will the acquittal riot be?" Every single thing you listed is irrelevant to whether the cop is acquitted, regardless of whether they're true or not.
Next time you start feeling manly and want to call ME dunce, make sure your own words aren't showing you for a fool.
I don't know, and neither you do if cop is going to be acquitted. My question is rhetorical, meaning... if blacks are capable of burning and destroying cities without all the facts are known, what are they going to do when cop is acquitted.
As of things I listed, they're still correct, and they'll be relevant during the trial. You don't want them to be, but that's just you being a dunce.
I can't swear it for a 100% certainty, no. I can tell you he'd have a better shot at winning the Powerball than he does of being acquitted, though. And no, four of the things you listed will not be relevant at trial, because they have very little to do with the validity of the core charge, and they have zero power to invalidate or even mitigate what the jury will see with their own eyes. The only one that might make a difference is the official cause of death, and since you have two medical examiners stating that the knee on the neck contributed to his cause of death, that's not ultimately going to be relevant, either.