Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[ding]

Show me where the data was collected at?

Is this data from NASA fudge too?

 

[0311]

Oooooops

A facial to all the climate crusaders....and have to say, after 15 years in this forum, I'm laughing.

"A funny thing happened as the WaPo tried to map out half a billion years of global temperatures and the "disaster of global warming""

No global warming...not even close

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming | ZeroHedge

Btw...note the source on the graph in the article

Denying climate does NOT the that climate is real.

 

[ding]

lol...JC... nobody cares about the 3mm. Didn't care 25 years ago...still don't care.

That's exactly my point. And it's perfectly normal for an interglacial period.

 

[jc456]

EMH Jr,

Is this data from the Royal Society fudge too?

View attachment 1064795

Where’s it taken from. See, your data never says where that data comes from. Why. Post a photo of the Statue of Liberty with the island shore missing! I gave you the island looked the same after multiple decades.

 

[jc456]

Denying climate does NOT the that climate is real.

You have no clue what climate is! Wow

 

[jc456]

Is this data from NASA fudge too?
View attachment 1064797

Waiting on the photo dude. Fake data is yesterday

 

[ding]

Where’s it taken from. See, your data never says where that data comes from. Why. Post a photo of the Statue of Liberty with the island shore missing! I gave you the island looked the same after multiple decades.

Is this data from a paper published in Nature fudge too?

 

[jc456]

lol...JC... nobody cares about the 3mm. Didn't care 25 years ago...still don't care.

Cause 3 mm’s you can’t capture

 

[jc456]

Is this data from a paper published in Nature fudge too?
View attachment 1064799

Dude, it’s shared data. That should help you

 

[ding]

Waiting on the photo dude. Fake data is yesterday

Was this technical paper on sea level rise fudge too?

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/91jc00064

 

[ding]

Dude, it’s shared data. That should help you

Was this technical paper on sea level rise fudge too?

Sea level rise

1. Global mean sea level (GMSL) has risen by about 7–8 inches (about 16–21 cm) since 1900, with about 3 of those inches (about 7 cm) occurring since 1993 (very high confidence). Human-caused climate change has made a substantial contribution to GMSL rise since 1900 (high confidence)...

digitalcommons.unl.edu

 

[jc456]

Was this technical paper on sea level rise fudge too?

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/91jc00064

Was Mann’s data accurate? Dude, until there’s factual visible signs, it’s all fake

 

[ding]

Was Mann’s data accurate? Dude, until there’s factual visible signs, it’s all fake

They are using tidal gauges and satellites, dumb ass. You dismissing valid data reflects poorly on the cause. You might as well be working for Apu.

 

[jc456]

They are using tidal gauges and satellites, dumb ass. You dismissing valid data reflects poorly on the cause. You might as well be working for Apu.

You have no idea what time of day, high tide, low tide! Come on man. I’m not budging. Don’t you ever grow tired of trying to force your will?

 

[ding]

You have no idea what time of day, high tide, low tide! Come on man. I’m not budging. Don’t you ever grow tired of trying to force your will?

That's my point. You have no idea what the tide state was when the pictures were taken. You can't use pictures as a measurement. And, no, I don't ever get tired of correcting inaccuracies.

 

[ding]

Don’t you ever grow tired of trying to force your will?

If I had given up the other day, you'd still believe warmer air produced higher air pressures and colder air produced lower air pressure.

 

[jc456]

That's my point. You have no idea what the tide state was when the pictures were taken. You can't use pictures as a measurement. And, no, I don't ever get tired of correcting inaccuracies.

time of day is close on the photos, your data has no such markers.

 

[ding]

time of day is close on the photos, your data has no such markers.

By definition tide gauges are calibrated markers. Satellites are calibrated. Photos are neither. And I noticed you didn't say anything about tide states either. You're such a dishonest person.

Should I just keep burying you with technical papers on sea level rise?

 

[jc456]

By definition tide gauges are calibrated markers. Satellites are calibrated. Photos are neither. And I noticed you didn't say anything about tide states either. You're such a dishonest person.

Should I just keep burying you with technical papers on sea level rise?

I noticed you ignored me earlier. I don’t give a shit about your feelings!

 

[skookerasbil]

AhhhhhHaaaa

Frigid Arctic cold blast will grip Canada and the U.S. through the second half of January