Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[Robert W]

Liar. You clearly know less than nothing about any of this.

Man you even lie to this forum on Sunday. Take Sunday off.

 

[jc456]

Good thing I'm not an idiot then. So why do you believe all ice is floating ice? Because that is literally your idiotic argument.

So you’re saying the Arctic is land?

 

[Robert W]

I know, only an idiot believes floating ice increases water volume when it melts

Keep this in mind when dealing with posters. What you said is taught to physics students. At least this was when I was a student in CA. Ice has a lot of air in ice.

 

[ding]

Keep this in mind when dealing with posters. What you said is taught to physics students. At least this was when I was a student in CA. Ice has a lot of air in ice.

He's trying to argue the sea level isn't rising. It's a pretty idiotic argument.

 

[Robert W]

He's trying to argue the sea level isn't rising. It's a pretty idiotic argument.

Sea is a very vague term. What Sea do you mean? Do you include oceans?

 

[ding]

So you’re saying the Arctic is land?

No. I'm arguing melt water is coming from where it's coming from which would include the Antarctic and that there is a fairly significant component of thermal expansion. Do you know what that is? Because you didn't list it as something that could cause sea level rise.

 

[ding]

Sea is a very vague term. What Sea do you mean? Do you include oceans?

Yes. The oceans. Which throughout the geologic record have fluctuated in concert with temperature.

 

[ding]

If there is warming then the sea level will be rising. The problem with social media dolts is that they don't want to admit there is warming.

 

[jc456]

No. I'm arguing melt water is coming from where it's coming from which would include the Antarctic and that there is a fairly significant component of thermal expansion. Do you know what that is? Because you didn't list it as something that could cause sea level rise.

I never ever said Antarctic. You said Arctic. Challenge me?

 

[otto105]

Oooooops

A facial to all the climate crusaders....and have to say, after 15 years in this forum, I'm laughing.

"A funny thing happened as the WaPo tried to map out half a billion years of global temperatures and the "disaster of global warming""

No global warming...not even close

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming | ZeroHedge

Btw...note the source on the graph in the article

Shocking is that you posted an article from zero hedge.

 

[ding]

I never ever said Antarctic. You said Arctic. Challenge me?

Where ever ice is... land or sea, it has a net melt because the planet is naturally warming up because heat is being circulated from the Atlantic to the Arctic which affects the entire planet. In addition to this net melt there is also thermal expansion occurring because the planet is warming.

You have it in your little pea brain that there is no warming so there can be no rise in sea level. You're wrong. And your wrongness is hurting the cause.

 

[jc456]

Where ever ice is... land or sea, it has a net melt because the planet is naturally warming up because heat is being circulated from the Atlantic to the Arctic which affects the entire planet. In addition to this net melt there is also thermal expansion occurring because the planet is warming.

You have it in your little pea brain that there is no warming so there can be no rise in sea level. You're wrong. And your wrongness is hurting the cause.

There’s been warming since the last ice age began. You said seas are rising. They aren’t. You can’t prove they are. You pull meaningless data. When the Arctic finally melts, only Greenland ice counts against sea rise. That you argued against. Can you admit your error?

 

[ding]

There’s been warming since the last ice age began. You said seas are rising. They aren’t. You can’t prove they are. You pull meaningless data. When the Arctic finally melts, only Greenland ice counts against sea rise. That you argued against. Can you admit your error?

The error is yours. Try using google to support your position, dummy. You'll soon see there is no evidence for your position. I can't think of a better way to discredit opposition of AGW than to make ridiculous arguments like you make.

 

[jc456]

The error is yours. Try using google to support your position, dummy. You'll soon see there is no evidence for your position. I can't think of a better way to discredit opposition of AGW than to make ridiculous arguments like you make.

What position are you talking about? There’s warming . It isn’t globally. In the northern hemisphere. Now you never asked me that. AGW is global warming. The Antarctic is not warming! Just isn’t

 

[ding]

What position are you talking about? There’s warming . It isn’t globally. In the northern hemisphere. Now you never asked me that. AGW is global warming. The Antarctic is not warming! Just isn’t

Where's your evidence that sea level isn't rising?

 

[jc456]

Where's your evidence that sea level isn't rising?

I provided photos. You forgot already? Where’s your proof of rise?

 

[ding]

I provided photos. You forgot already? Where’s your proof of rise?

Photo's aren't evidence. What else do you have?

 

[ding]

Where’s your proof of rise?

Everywhere. You can't conduct a google search without finding thousands of links with evidence.

You know what you can't find on a google search? An idiot claiming there's no sea level rise.

 

[skookerasbil]

Only retarded folks conflate the LA wildfires with climate change....

AP News Heavily Ratioed For Blaming Palisades Fire On Climate Change | ZeroHedge

 

[jc456]

Photo's aren't evidence. What else do you have?

How? I take a photo from seventy pus years ago and water levels are the same today, ain’t rise. Just saying. Dude. It’s over. Concede while you have dignity. Just post one photo where 31 inches rise can be seen. That’s your claim. 4mm per year