Antarctica undergoing severe and long-lasting heat wave



dating wood 30k years old... LOL!!!

Where was the wood, in a TEEPEE???

Spend a Night in a Teepee | 100+ Things to Do Before You Die | POPSUGAR ...

Teepee Free Stock Photo - Public Domain Pictures


 
The claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago took only 75k years to form is the level of your "integrity."
"...According to the marine records, the Eemian interglacial ended with a rapid cooling event about 110,000 years ago (e.g., Imbrie et al., 1984; Martinson et al., 1987), which also shows up in ice cores and pollen records from across Eurasia. From a relatively high resolution core in the North Atlantic. Adkins et al. (1997) suggested that the final cooling event took less than 400 years, and it might have been much more rapid..."

 
"...According to the marine records, the Eemian interglacial ended with a rapid cooling event about 110,000 years ago (e.g., Imbrie et al., 1984; Martinson et al., 1987), which also shows up in ice cores and pollen records from across Eurasia. From a relatively high resolution core in the North Atlantic. Adkins et al. (1997) suggested that the final cooling event took less than 400 years, and it might have been much more rapid..."



And that is where we are. We have PARROTS of LIES who cannot answer the most basic climate questions.

They still claim, I'm right because I PARROT LIES....

Answer this, you piece of shit taxpayer funded liar...

HOW MANY YEARS OLD ARE GLACIERS THAT ARE 2.5 MILES THICK???

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.
 
And that is where we are. We have PARROTS of LIES who cannot answer the most basic climate questions.

They still claim, I'm right because I PARROT LIES....

Answer this, you piece of shit taxpayer funded liar...

HOW MANY YEARS OLD ARE GLACIERS THAT ARE 2.5 MILES THICK???

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.
The geologic record does not lie, dummy. You have the intellect of a gnat.
 
The geologic record does not lie, dummy. You have the intellect of a gnat.


The "geological record" you cite is about SCRATCHES IN ROCKS....

Glaciers move during winter, melt a bit during summer, back and forth.... not exactly a sound basis to scream ice age glacial every year...
 
The "geological record" you cite is about SCRATCHES IN ROCKS....

Glaciers move during winter, melt a bit during summer, back and forth.... not exactly a sound basis to scream ice age glacial every year...
That's exactly what someone with the intellect of a gnat would say.
 
That's exactly what someone with the intellect of a gnat would say.


LOL!!

From someone who won't answer how old a 2.5 mile thick glacier is....

You have a beak and a birdbrain. You parrot lies. That's what you do, and the taxpayer pays you to...
 
LOL!!

From someone who won't answer how old a 2.5 mile thick glacier is....

You have a beak and a birdbrain. You parrot lies. That's what you do, and the taxpayer pays you to...
I want you to look around and see the squalor you live in.
 
I want you to look around and see the squalor you live in.


Since you are a "taxpayer funded climate scientist" why can't you answer how old a 2.5 mile thick glacier is???
 
We have been hearing about a rise in the sea level for decades. We are told that the planet is warming at an alarming rate. And yet...the sea levels haven't risen even a single inch.

At some point these fukkers are going to have to admit that they have been wrong all along.

Nah. They never will.
 
We have been hearing about a rise in the sea level for decades. We are told that the planet is warming at an alarming rate. And yet...the sea levels haven't risen even a single inch.

At some point these fukkers are going to have to admit that they have been wrong all along.

Nah. They never will.
These data indicate sea level has risen 8.86 inches since 1880 and that the rate of increase is accelerating.

1723298593536.png

1723298637482.png
 
Last edited:
Why do you ask? Are you attempting to suggest that it hasn't accelerated?
I'm suggesting projections were that it would triple by the end of this decade.

But as for your comment it's still 3 to 4 mm/yr.

But feel free to make some projections using whatever acceleration you think applies. It gets ridiculous pretty fast if you are actually using acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Are you telling me you don't believe the rate will triple by the end of this decade? I don't either. You can expect the same trend as the last 6,000 years. 3 to 4 mm/yr.
I'm asking you for a link to whoever it is you are claiming made such a projection. Or an admission that you're unable to provide such a thing.

For the 6,000 years preceding the Industrial Revolution, the Earth had been getting cooler. Decreasing temperatures do not make sea levels rise.
 
I'm asking you for a link to whoever it is you are claiming made such a projection. Or an admission that you're unable to provide such a thing.
It was posted in this forum by one of your cronies. I don't make it a habit to bookmark ridiculous claims.

So are you agreeing with me that that is a ridiculous claim? Otherwise, why are you asking for it?
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom