Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"...According to the marine records, the Eemian interglacial ended with a rapid cooling event about 110,000 years ago (e.g., Imbrie et al., 1984; Martinson et al., 1987), which also shows up in ice cores and pollen records from across Eurasia. From a relatively high resolution core in the North Atlantic. Adkins et al. (1997) suggested that the final cooling event took less than 400 years, and it might have been much more rapid..."The claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago took only 75k years to form is the level of your "integrity."
"...According to the marine records, the Eemian interglacial ended with a rapid cooling event about 110,000 years ago (e.g., Imbrie et al., 1984; Martinson et al., 1987), which also shows up in ice cores and pollen records from across Eurasia. From a relatively high resolution core in the North Atlantic. Adkins et al. (1997) suggested that the final cooling event took less than 400 years, and it might have been much more rapid..."
The geologic record does not lie, dummy. You have the intellect of a gnat.And that is where we are. We have PARROTS of LIES who cannot answer the most basic climate questions.
They still claim, I'm right because I PARROT LIES....
Answer this, you piece of shit taxpayer funded liar...
HOW MANY YEARS OLD ARE GLACIERS THAT ARE 2.5 MILES THICK???
The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.
The geologic record does not lie, dummy. You have the intellect of a gnat.
That's exactly what someone with the intellect of a gnat would say.The "geological record" you cite is about SCRATCHES IN ROCKS....
Glaciers move during winter, melt a bit during summer, back and forth.... not exactly a sound basis to scream ice age glacial every year...
That's exactly what someone with the intellect of a gnat would say.
I want you to look around and see the squalor you live in.LOL!!
From someone who won't answer how old a 2.5 mile thick glacier is....
You have a beak and a birdbrain. You parrot lies. That's what you do, and the taxpayer pays you to...
You are a moron.Since you are a "taxpayer funded climate scientist" why can't you answer how old a 2.5 mile thick glacier is???
These data indicate sea level has risen 8.86 inches since 1880 and that the rate of increase is accelerating.We have been hearing about a rise in the sea level for decades. We are told that the planet is warming at an alarming rate. And yet...the sea levels haven't risen even a single inch.
At some point these fukkers are going to have to admit that they have been wrong all along.
Nah. They never will.
Has the rate tripled yet?These data indicate sea level has risen 8.86 inches since 1880 and that the rate of increase is accelerating.
View attachment 993203
View attachment 993204
Why do you ask? Are you attempting to suggest that it hasn't accelerated?Has the rate tripled yet?
dating wood 30k years old... LOL!!!
Where was the wood, in a TEEPEE???
![]()
![]()
I'm suggesting projections were that it would triple by the end of this decade.Why do you ask? Are you attempting to suggest that it hasn't accelerated?
Link?I'm suggesting projections were that it would triple by the end of this decade.
3.4 mm/yearBut as for your comment it's still 3 to 4 mm/yr.
Are you telling me you don't believe the rate will triple by the end of this decade? I don't either. You can expect the same trend as the last 6,000 years. 3 to 4 mm/yr.Link?
3.4 mm/year
Is the rate of sea-level rise increasing? – NASA Sea Level Change Portal
Visit NASA's portal for an in-depth look at the science behind sea level change.sealevel.nasa.gov
I'm asking you for a link to whoever it is you are claiming made such a projection. Or an admission that you're unable to provide such a thing.Are you telling me you don't believe the rate will triple by the end of this decade? I don't either. You can expect the same trend as the last 6,000 years. 3 to 4 mm/yr.
It was posted in this forum by one of your cronies. I don't make it a habit to bookmark ridiculous claims.I'm asking you for a link to whoever it is you are claiming made such a projection. Or an admission that you're unable to provide such a thing.