More dumbfuckery. Canada has about 40 million people. China has about a billion. Shanghai has about 25 million people, and probably as much industry as the whole of Canada. With far less environmental laws. Canada's Prime Minister earned a BS at Harvard, and a Master's and Phd at Oxford. He has extensive experience in finance and banking. Meanwhile with have a convicted felon and child rapist for President with proven record of bankrupting projects he headed.
And you do nothing but flap silly yap with no evidence to back up anything you post. Just another MAGAt idjit.
Well, here is an area that is well ahead of us in installation and use of renewables and storage. South Australia.
The integration of renewable energy sources in South Australia has significantly reduced electricity costs. Here are some key points highlighting how renewables contribute to lower electricity costs:
Why then the increase?
- Net 100% renewables target: South Australia aims for net 100% renewable electricity generation by 2030, which is expected to lower electricity prices by making wind and solar cheaper than gas.1
- Wholesale electricity prices: The wholesale electricity prices in South Australia have almost halved from $64 per megawatt-hour in December 2022 to $33/MWh in the same quarter in 2023, driven by abundant solar and wind power.4
- Negative operational demand: For the first time in the National Electricity Market, there was a period of negative operational demand, where rooftop solar generated more electricity than was needed for the entire state.4
- Market dynamics: The wholesale price of electricity depends on various market factors, including the cost of natural gas, which has been a significant influence on electricity pricing.2
- Consumer prices: Despite the low wholesale prices, South Australian consumers have experienced higher average wholesale price components of their electricity bills compared to other states.3 These factors collectively demonstrate the impact of renewable energy on lowering electricity costs in South Australia, contributing to a more sustainable and cost-effective energy system.
If Renewables Are So Cheap, Why Is South Australian Electricity So Expensive?
Discover why are South Australia's electricity prices are so high, even with 70% of generation now coming from wind and solar power.www.solarquotes.com.au
Well, here is an area that is well ahead of us in installation and use of renewables and storage. South Australia.
The integration of renewable energy sources in South Australia has significantly reduced electricity costs. Here are some key points highlighting how renewables contribute to lower electricity costs:
Why then the increase?
- Net 100% renewables target: South Australia aims for net 100% renewable electricity generation by 2030, which is expected to lower electricity prices by making wind and solar cheaper than gas.1
- Wholesale electricity prices: The wholesale electricity prices in South Australia have almost halved from $64 per megawatt-hour in December 2022 to $33/MWh in the same quarter in 2023, driven by abundant solar and wind power.4
- Negative operational demand: For the first time in the National Electricity Market, there was a period of negative operational demand, where rooftop solar generated more electricity than was needed for the entire state.4
- Market dynamics: The wholesale price of electricity depends on various market factors, including the cost of natural gas, which has been a significant influence on electricity pricing.2
- Consumer prices: Despite the low wholesale prices, South Australian consumers have experienced higher average wholesale price components of their electricity bills compared to other states.3 These factors collectively demonstrate the impact of renewable energy on lowering electricity costs in South Australia, contributing to a more sustainable and cost-effective energy system.
If Renewables Are So Cheap, Why Is South Australian Electricity So Expensive?
Discover why are South Australia's electricity prices are so high, even with 70% of generation now coming from wind and solar power.
You don't think.
"It not only lowers the cost" (see my previous in Iowa's Rates).....
100% renewable worked so well in Spain...Well, here is an area that is well ahead of us in installation and use of renewables and storage. South Australia.
The integration of renewable energy sources in South Australia has significantly reduced electricity costs. Here are some key points highlighting how renewables contribute to lower electricity costs:
Why then the increase?
- Net 100% renewables target: South Australia aims for net 100% renewable electricity generation by 2030, which is expected to lower electricity prices by making wind and solar cheaper than gas.1
- Wholesale electricity prices: The wholesale electricity prices in South Australia have almost halved from $64 per megawatt-hour in December 2022 to $33/MWh in the same quarter in 2023, driven by abundant solar and wind power.4
- Negative operational demand: For the first time in the National Electricity Market, there was a period of negative operational demand, where rooftop solar generated more electricity than was needed for the entire state.4
- Market dynamics: The wholesale price of electricity depends on various market factors, including the cost of natural gas, which has been a significant influence on electricity pricing.2
- Consumer prices: Despite the low wholesale prices, South Australian consumers have experienced higher average wholesale price components of their electricity bills compared to other states.3 These factors collectively demonstrate the impact of renewable energy on lowering electricity costs in South Australia, contributing to a more sustainable and cost-effective energy system.
If Renewables Are So Cheap, Why Is South Australian Electricity So Expensive?
Discover why are South Australia's electricity prices are so high, even with 70% of generation now coming from wind and solar power.
Tell us the other story.
Pee wee?
Receipt for lower bills please
...And we are and will exceed the current CO2 level easily at the rate we're going as atmospheric CO2 is Cumulative and lasts from 5-200 years. I think 500 PPM is in the cards by 2050 or before.
The USA is doing a great job lowering emissions in the last decade, almost the 'GND' of AOC due to the fact Renewables have become 80-90% cheaper/more efficient in that short time period. But we still contribute though Not Nearly as much as 'Chindia' and the 'developing world.
Alas, we got to 400+ so fast (100-200x natural speed) we probably just have to wait for the snowballing Melt (+free and generated Methane) to catch up.
The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
Royal Meteorological Society
The last time carbon dioxide was so plentiful in our planet's atmosphere was in the Pliocene era, around 3 million years ago. Life on Earth was dominated by giant mammals; humans and chimps had shared their last common ancestor. Although the sun's force was about the same, the sea levels were 15 metres (50') higher and Arctic summer temperatures were 14 degrees higher than the present day.".."
The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
The Pliocene: >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
www.rmets.org
co2.Earth
`
abu afak do you not speak English?
Again for FrusaderCrank who cannot even read, not to mention being the stupidest poster on the board.
...And we are and will exceed the current CO2 level easily at the rate we're going as atmospheric CO2 is Cumulative and lasts from 5-200 years. I think 500 PPM is in the cards by 2050 or before.
The USA is doing a great job lowering emissions in the last decade, almost the 'GND' of AOC due to the fact Renewables have become 80-90% cheaper/more efficient in that short time period. But we still contribute though Not Nearly as much as 'Chindia' and the 'developing world.
Alas, we got to 400+ so fast (100-200x natural speed) we probably just have to wait for the snowballing Melt (+free and generated Methane) to catch up.
The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
Royal Meteorological Society
The last time carbon dioxide was so plentiful in our planet's atmosphere was in the Pliocene era, around 3 million years ago. Life on Earth was dominated by giant mammals; humans and chimps had shared their last common ancestor. Although the sun's force was about the same, the sea levels were 15 metres (50') higher and Arctic summer temperatures were 14 degrees higher than the present day.".."
The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
The Pliocene: >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2
www.rmets.org
co2.Earth
`
Thanks for clarifying
each turbine requires tons of concrete and steel for its base and 50 gallons of oil for lubrication. the blades do not degrade and are filling up landfills with toxic waste. they also do not work when there is no wind and kill birds by the thousands.
And I stated clearly, South Australia.
reneweconomy.com.au
reneweconomy.com.au
