Antarctica undergoing severe and long-lasting heat wave

[EMH]

20 miles or less is the difference between totally green and totally covered in ice?

It is all about reaching that point where annual snowfall ceases to fully melt during "summer." Once that point is reached, a land mass the size of Greenland takes 1-2 million years to get covered with glacier head to toe. So, "miles" as you put it really is years, once the "glacier manufacturing point" is reached by tectonic plate movement.

You cannot find one single example of that NOT being the case...

 

[Crick]

It is all about reaching that point where annual snowfall ceases to fully melt during "summer." Once that point is reached, a land mass the size of Greenland takes 1-2 million years to get covered with glacier head to toe. So, "miles" as you put it really is years, once the "glacier manufacturing point" is reached by tectonic plate movement.

You cannot find one single example of that NOT being the case...

If I find someplace where all the winter snow completely melts for one day before new snowfall starts building, you would characterize that as "green"?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is all about reaching that point where annual snowfall ceases to fully melt during "summer." Once that point is reached, a land mass the size of Greenland takes 1-2 million years to get covered with glacier head to toe. So, "miles" as you put it really is years, once the "glacier manufacturing point" is reached by tectonic plate movement.

You cannot find one single example of that NOT being the case...

Apparently, you think 20 miles is enough.

 

[EMH]

Apparently, you think 20 miles is enough.

There really is a "line" where the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt, and starts to stack.

The evidence called planet Earth today is proof.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There really is a "line" where the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt, and starts to stack.

The evidence called planet Earth today is proof.

You seemed to think that moving 20 miles over 2 million years was the difference
between giant ice sheets over large portions on NA and none.

 

[EMH]

You seemed to think that moving 20 miles over 2 million years was the difference
between giant ice sheets over large portions on NA and none.

No, you are "blurring" the start of an ice age

WHEN land arrives at that 600 miles to the Pole threshold and hence the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt during "summer" and hence starts to STACK, which is the start of an ICE AGE

with

How long it takes for such an ICE AGE to cover Greenland, Antarctica, North America etc.. and the answer for Greenland appears to be at least 1 million years for 1000 miles, so about a mile every thousand years.


Compare that to McBullshit and Chicago, because in 75k years the ice that started at the top of Northern Canada would not get 1/10th the distance needed to even get to Chicago...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, you are "blurring" the start of an ice age

WHEN land arrives at that 600 miles to the Pole threshold and hence the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt during "summer" and hence starts to STACK, which is the start of an ICE AGE

with

How long it takes for such an ICE AGE to cover Greenland, Antarctica, North America etc.. and the answer for Greenland appears to be at least 1 million years for 1000 miles, so about a mile every thousand years.


Compare that to McBullshit and Chicago, because in 75k years the ice that started at the top of Northern Canada would not get 1/10th the distance needed to even get to Chicago...

Still no evidence that the ice sheet lasted 50 million years?

 

[EMH]

Still no evidence that the ice sheet lasted 50 million years?

LOL!!!

75k years completely disproven.

50 million was the accepted duration prior to 2012.

Conveniently, right after this ended... McBullshit started...

Google Search

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

75k years completely disproven.

50 million was the accepted duration prior to 2012.

Conveniently, right after this ended... McBullshit started...

Google Search

75k years completely disproven.

Where? Link?

50 million was the accepted duration prior to 2012.

Where? Link?

 

[EMH]

75k years completely disproven.

Where? Link?

50 million was the accepted duration prior to 2012.

Where? Link?

The claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago took only 75k years to form is the level of your "integrity."

As for McBullshit, it "erased" North American Ice Age from Google and other search engines, but the timing is pretty well defined...


homO goes silent on Co2 FRAUD 2010-2012

Google Search

And then McBullshit comes out and North American Ice Age gets deleted.


For everyone wondering about Toddster, McBullshit, and the claim that Chicago's 2.5 mile glaciers took only 75k years to form, it is all here, complete with Toddster citing a "study" that "dates wood" 30k years old... problem = wood fully decomposes in 100 years... oooppps...

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago took only 75k years to form is the level of your "integrity."

As for McBullshit, it "erased" North American Ice Age from Google and other search engines, but the timing is pretty well defined...


homO goes silent on Co2 FRAUD 2010-2012

Google Search

And then McBullshit comes out and North American Ice Age gets deleted.


For everyone wondering about Toddster, McBullshit, and the claim that Chicago's 2.5 mile glaciers took only 75k years to form, it is all here, complete with Toddster citing a "study" that "dates wood" 30k years old... problem = wood fully decomposes in 100 years... oooppps...

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

The claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago took only 75k years to form is the level of your "integrity."

If you can disprove that, go for it.

As for McBullshit

I don't know what that means.

homO goes silent on Co2 FRAUD 2010-2012

"Obama didn't say anything" means your psycho rants are factual? LOL!

citing a "study" that "dates wood" 30k years old... problem = wood fully decomposes in 100 years... oooppps...

If you have a study that says wood fully decomposes in 100 years...post it.

 

[EMH]

If you have a study that says wood fully decomposes in 100 years...post it.

How long does it take for wood to break down into soil?

Answer (1 of 4): Wood decomposes to temporarily exist as organic matter, or humus, in the soil. It “becomes soil” when it joins the mixture of inorganic mineral grains, air, water, and living and dead organic matter that make up soil. Decomposition doesn’t stop, though, and it will eventually dis...

www.quora.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How long does it take for wood to break down into soil?

Answer (1 of 4): Wood decomposes to temporarily exist as organic matter, or humus, in the soil. It “becomes soil” when it joins the mixture of inorganic mineral grains, air, water, and living and dead organic matter that make up soil. Decomposition doesn’t stop, though, and it will eventually dis...

www.quora.com

Let me know when you find a study.

 

[EMH]

Let me know when you find a study.

How about you find anyone anywhere who claims that wood outside unfrozen doesn't decompose in 100 years, or slightly more than 100 years, apparently one type of wood takes less than 200 years... your study says 30000 years... because your study was a TAXPAYER FUNDED FUDGED FRAUD "study" and part of the treason that is the Co2 FRAUD.

 

[ding]

Antarctica is undergoing a severe and long-lasting heat wave because the northern hemisphere is deglaciating like it does every interglacial period.

The northern hemisphere is deglaciating because heat from the Atlantic is being circulated to the Arctic.

Absent heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic, the northern hemisphere glaciates like it does in every glacial glacial period.

When the northern hemisphere glaciates the entire planet cools like it does every glacial period.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How about you find anyone anywhere who claims that wood outside unfrozen doesn't decompose in 100 years, or slightly more than 100 years, apparently one type of wood takes less than 200 years... your study says 30000 years... because your study was a TAXPAYER FUNDED FUDGED FRAUD "study" and part of the treason that is the Co2 FRAUD.

Why do you keep saying "wood outside" when my link didn't say that?

 

[EMH]

Why do you keep saying "wood outside" when my link didn't say that?

So where was the wood if it wasn't outside??

LOL!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So where was the wood if it wasn't outside??

LOL!!

Post my clip.

 

[EMH]

Post my clip.

For the 5th time, so you can lie and try to hide the truth that you parroted a FUDGED FRAUD taxpayer funded "study..."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

For the 5th time, so you can lie and try to hide the truth that you parroted a FUDGED FRAUD taxpayer funded "study..."