Antarctica undergoing severe and long-lasting heat wave

Buried under what?

Soil...???

Sorry, roots and all decompose fully in 100 years....

Nice try....

Any more great "studies" you parrot?

Buried under what?

Fossil wood and soil within and beneath the glacial deposits.

Illiterate.

Sorry, roots and all decompose fully in 100 years....

Prove your claim.

Any more great "studies" you parrot?

I'm still waiting for your studies.
 
It doesn't include the feedback you fucking idiot. Neither water vapor, clouds nor albedo are emitted components. But if you need help with addition and subtraction, you let us know.
It's the same value as in this graphic and water vapor isn't shown here either. They are including water vapor in with CO2. So fraudulent.

Where's the breakdown of feedback?

1723390248114.webp
 
It doesn't include the feedback you fucking idiot. Neither water vapor, clouds nor albedo are emitted components. But if you need help with addition and subtraction, you let us know.
I don't think it's possible for you to be honest about any of this.
 
I don't think it's possible for you to be honest about any of this.
I don't think it's possible for you to understand a graph or read simple english.
 
Says the guy who can't show the feedback from CO2.


Global Loss of Albedo


1723395502901.webp


Loss of albedo due to Arctic sea ice extent

1723395302233.webp


Loss of albedo due to Antarctic sea ice extent

1723395733775.webp


Increased global humidity

1723395084512.webp

 
Global Loss of Albedo


View attachment 993974

Loss of albedo due to Arctic sea ice extent

View attachment 993972

Loss of albedo due to Antarctic sea ice extent

View attachment 993976

Increased global humidity

View attachment 993970
How is that relevant to their dishonest tactic of not separating the GHG effect of CO2 from the feedback from the GHG effect of CO2 in their model reporting?
 
How is that relevant to their dishonest tactic of not separating the GHG effect of CO2 from the feedback from the GHG effect of CO2 in their model reporting?
Why are you so stupid?
 
Why are you so stupid?
The theoretical surface warming from doubling CO2 is 1C. That's it. That's why they dishonestly lump incorrect feedbacks in their reports. That's why you can't say how much is radiative forcing and how much is feedback.

They don't want anyone to know the feedback is 3.5 times the GHG effect of CO2.

Dishonest and fraudulent.
 
What is your source for that?
It is widely known and accepted in the climate community. The IPCC lists it as emergent radiative forcing and it is shown as slightly more than 1C for the year 2100 which is approximately a doubling of CO2 to 560 ppm.
 
1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
6. Why is Surface Air Pressure dropping for the past 70 years during what the Co2 Fraud claims is an ongoing net ice melt and warming?
 
It is widely known and accepted in the climate community. The IPCC lists it as emergent radiative forcing and it is shown as slightly more than 1C for the year 2100 which is approximately a doubling of CO2 to 560 ppm.
Then you'll have no problem providing a fucking link.
 
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
You can't see one because you are being willfully blind.

I already gave you one example, but I'll give you some more.

The city of Jakarta is sinking so much, the country of Jakarta is looking at moving their capital.


The World’s Fastest-Sinking Megacity Has One Last Chance to Save Itself​


Venice is sinking. So are Rotterdam, Bangkok and New York. But no place compares to Jakarta, the fastest-sinking megacity on the planet.

You like photos, do you?

Here's a sea level rise map viewer:

 
You can't see one because you are being willfully blind.

I already gave you one example, but I'll give you some more.

The city of Jakarta is sinking so much, the country of Jakarta is looking at moving their capital.



The World’s Fastest-Sinking Megacity Has One Last Chance to Save Itself



Venice is sinking. So are Rotterdam, Bangkok and New York. But no place compares to Jakarta, the fastest-sinking megacity on the planet.

You like photos, do you?

Here's a sea level rise map viewer:


Thanks for the link.


Parts of Jakarta are subsiding at unprecedented speed.

It doesn't refute the idiot's claim, sadly.
 
It's in the IPCC reports. See emergent radiative forcing component.
I just opened the full report of The Physical Science Basis and searching for:

emergent radiative forcing component
emergent radiative forcing
emergent radiative
emergent forcing
emergent component

All found NO OCURRENCE

Searching for just the word "emergent" found it 180 times, so I'm looking through that. I've got a suspicion that you just made that up and you have no source for that claim.

95 out of 100 instances were occurrences of the term "emergent constraints". The rest were "emergent features".

So, you're lying. Again.
 
I just opened the full report of The Physical Science Basis and searching for:

emergent radiative forcing component
emergent radiative forcing
emergent radiative
emergent forcing
emergent component

All found NO OCURRENCE

Searching for just the word "emergent" found it 180 times, so I'm looking through that. I've got a suspicion that you just made that up and you have no source for that claim.

95 out of 100 instances were occurrences of the term "emergent constraints". The rest were "emergent features".

So, you're lying. Again.
You are going to have to look at the graphics. That's where I saw it.

But are you really going to argue that the GHG effect isn't immediate?
 
You can't see one because you are being willfully blind.

I already gave you one example, but I'll give you some more.

The city of Jakarta is sinking so much, the country of Jakarta is looking at moving their capital.

The World’s Fastest-Sinking Megacity Has One Last Chance to Save Itself



Venice is sinking. So are Rotterdam, Bangkok and New York. But no place compares to Jakarta, the fastest-sinking megacity on the planet.

You like photos, do you?

Here's a sea level rise map viewer:



We have something called the statue of liberty. Why is Jakarta "sinking" but Lady Liberty is not?
 
You are going to have to look at the graphics. That's where I saw it.
Searching a PDF finds text in graphics as well as in body. YOU ARE LYING
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom