I think that’s a pretty loose and generalized statement. I think most judges rule according to the law and merits of the cases presentedIt shouldn’t matter who appoints the judge. The law is the lawHe tried to overrule the law with the EO. It was challenged in court and a judge decided to overrule the EO. That’s how the system works. Biden can now appeal it or let it goNope, we are a nation of laws from all sides. The system seemed to work just fine. So what are you bitching about?Haha. Go for it. Let the snowflakin begin.Isn’t the executive in charge of immigration enforcement?Abusing power? How so?Yeah, abusing your power is no big deal. Thanks statist40 EOs?! Wow. He must be blowing Trump out of the water with the accomplishments!! It’s like something that nobody has ever seen before. Historical accomplishments so far. Go Biden!I thought this was going to be about his 40 EOs
Harley's (and I've seen it elsewhere) "argument" about "number of EOs" reminds me of the old Monty Python sketch where they talk about Shakespeare plays in terms of how many words. "Well there they all are, now let's get them in the right order". Argumentum ad Ridiculum.
By violating immigration law on day one.
.
No, actually the law is. The law says an alien with a final deportation order must be removed within 90 days, there is no exception. quid pro joe delayed all deportations for a minimum of 100 days. That was a violation of the law and his oath. I guess it's time to impeach his ass.
.
He's already got his ass kicked in court. I guess you figure we are only a nation of laws that you like.
.
So, are the aliens being deported as the law demands, or is Biden overruling the law with his eo?
I am pleasantly shocked that the system worked as it is supposed to.
I assume that the judge was a republican appointed judge?
It shouldn't but it does.
There is a real distinction in judicial philosophy and has been for quite some time. Liberals more and more see the courts as a place to "make the world a better place" by deciding the law based on what they view as "right".
While conservative judges, hold to the old school view that their job is to apply the law the legislature handed down, within the bounds of the constitution.
What do you base that on?