Pogo
As an illogical defense to the modern Barbaric Islam custom of stoning women for (alleged) sex, you've consistently attempted to argue the origin of stoning as a defense for barbaric Islam. You've done it in countless other threads; you've done it immediately in this thread. I don't even indulge your dead on arrival argument other than to say this is what you're doing. You are a hack that is afraid of serious discussion on this matter. And you'll attempt to divert future threads like this in the same manner just like hacks do.
Again, you're a liar. I've never argued what the origin of stoning is. I don't even know that info.
Don't play semantics, son; or trifle with the word liar for that matter. You blather on about how stoning pre-dates Islam at every chance. Now then, step into 2015 and deal with reality (
for which this thread was created).
We don't care about your meandering history lessons.
Once again son ---- WHO posted this?
you've consistently attempted to argue the origin of stoning as a defense for barbaric Islam.
Is that my name on that post??
I have never, here or anywhere else, posted on "the origin of stoning". I don't know what that origin is, I doubt anyone does, and I'm quite positive you don't. I don't post on shit I know nothing about. Therein lieth the difference between us.
