A Day Late And A Dollar Short

[22lcidw]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Arguing the semantics of issues is the BLM/Antifa coincidence closer to a presidential election with a virus pandemic going on also. Obama....8 frigging years! Many blue areas that are double and triple blue! Even today.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

 

[BluesLegend]

FACT: Dem mayors have told these lawless mobs that it's okay to riot, loot, and burn and they won't be prosecuted ENABLING this behavior. Hell you have some of these dumbass mayors 'standing with' the mobs supporting them for christ sake.

Why isn't every last one of these thugs in JAIL??

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

There's this thing called money.....

And? That means EXACTLY what I said. Single-parent households affecting the way people live is a socio-economic issue NOT a political one.

If anyone needs a father figure in their life it's the poor.
Assuming of course the father figure isnt a gang member.
But yes it is a political problem,when the gov pays women to have children it's going to create problems simple as that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

Sometimes a poster will inadvertently reveal how truly little they understand.....as you just did.

1966 LBJ expanded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program…under FDR, AFDC had been limited to widows, those who had lost their husbands and now lacked a breadwinner at home to help support the children.

Then began to loosen and expand the rules of AFDC eligibility, eventually getting to the point where any woman living alone with children could take advantage of this program. In doing so, they not only bought a large number of new votes, they also incentivized out of wedlock births and single motherhood.

As Charles Murray described in “Losing Ground,” the Great Society incentivized the same negative behaviors that cause poverty in the first place.

Millions of women discovered that they could be better off financially by not marrying.



I'd be happy to provide the statistics on what happens to children raised in a single parent household.

You are just showing how ignorant YOU are. RED states pull they most on federal government social programs, and in places like where I live in Kentucky, it is NOT single-parent Black families, it is single-parent WHITE families. Jesus you people are so fucking blind. It is NOT a Black and white issue. It happens with ALL people, and it is a socio-economic issue.

There it is again.....fingernails on a blackboard.


Peripheral to your point, but may I vent on this point.....the 'color of states' thing is like fingernails on a blackboard to me.

We are blue, they are red.



Red is traditionally associated with socialism and communism. The oldest symbol of socialism (and, by extension, communism) is the Red Flag, which dates back to the revolutions of 1848. The colour red was chosen to represent the blood of the workers who died in the struggle against capitalism. All major socialist and communist alliances and organisations – including the First, Second, and Third Internationals – used red as their official colour. The association between the colour red and communism is particularly strong. Communists use red much more often and more extensively than other ideologies use their respective traditional colours.


In the United States, since the year 2000, the mass media have associated red with the Republican Party, despite the fact that the Republican Party is a conservative-leaning party. Since at least 2010, the party has adopted an all red logo.
Political colour - Wikipedia


"The choice of colors in this divide is counter-intuitive to many international observers, as throughout the world, red is commonly the designated color for parties representing labor, socialist, and/or liberal interests [5] [6], which in the United States would be more closely correlated with the Democratic Party. Similarly, blue is used in these countries to depict conservative parties which in the case of the United States would be a color more suitable for the Republicans. For example, in Canada party colors are deeply ingrained and historic and have been unchanged during the Twentieth Century. Red states and blue states - Wikipedia







The Democrats should be Gray….reminiscent of the outfits they wore when they were the Confederacy, and we’re Blue….the color we wore when we pried their slaves away from them.

Justice will not be on the upswing until the true color scheme is put back in place.

 

[BluesLegend]

And what does any of this have to do with a car dealership?? Hey just burn the dealership to the ground I guess out of spite? Wealth envy? WTF

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

Sometimes a poster will inadvertently reveal how truly little they understand.....as you just did.

1966 LBJ expanded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program…under FDR, AFDC had been limited to widows, those who had lost their husbands and now lacked a breadwinner at home to help support the children.

Then began to loosen and expand the rules of AFDC eligibility, eventually getting to the point where any woman living alone with children could take advantage of this program. In doing so, they not only bought a large number of new votes, they also incentivized out of wedlock births and single motherhood.

As Charles Murray described in “Losing Ground,” the Great Society incentivized the same negative behaviors that cause poverty in the first place.

Millions of women discovered that they could be better off financially by not marrying.



I'd be happy to provide the statistics on what happens to children raised in a single parent household.

You are just showing how ignorant YOU are. RED states pull they most on federal government social programs, and in places like where I live in Kentucky, it is NOT single-parent Black families, it is single-parent WHITE families. Jesus you people are so fucking blind. It is NOT a Black and white issue. It happens with ALL people, and it is a socio-economic issue.

It's a way bigger problem in the inner city.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

There's this thing called money.....

And? That means EXACTLY what I said. Single-parent households affecting the way people live is a socio-economic issue NOT a political one.

How dense can you be.

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."



You REALLY need a course of study.

Say the word and I'll list some books as a place to begin.

So you are a Marxist?

How dumb can you be? You argue against Marxism and socialism all the time and then quote a Marxist. You are some kind of special.

Obviously I wounded you deeply in pointing out your lacunae.

That explains your attempt to 'get even' with this post.

It fell flat.

Consider yourself dismissed.

 

[eagle1462010]

Biden, Harris Attack Police After Shooting In Kenosha Leads To Violent Riots, Police Hit With Bricks | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

 

[BluesLegend]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

There's this thing called money.....

And? That means EXACTLY what I said. Single-parent households affecting the way people live is a socio-economic issue NOT a political one.

How dense can you be.

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."



You REALLY need a course of study.

Say the word and I'll list some books as a place to begin.

So you are a Marxist?

How dumb can you be? You argue against Marxism and socialism all the time and then quote a Marxist. You are some kind of special.

Obviously I wounded you deeply in pointing out your lacunae.

That explains your attempt to 'get even' with this post.

It fell flat.

Consider yourself dismissed.

An implied 'dismissed' was all this required.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

They are a serious societal issue in America, yes.

 

[eagle1462010]

And now a message from BLM

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

Do you REALLY think single parent households are a political issue? I mean SERIOUSLY? How many times has Trump been divorced and how many different women has Trump had kids with? The only difference is he is rich enough to hire nannies. That's not political, that's socio-economical.

There's this thing called money.....

And? That means EXACTLY what I said. Single-parent households affecting the way people live is a socio-economic issue NOT a political one.

How dense can you be.

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."



You REALLY need a course of study.

Say the word and I'll list some books as a place to begin.

So you are a Marxist?

How dumb can you be? You argue against Marxism and socialism all the time and then quote a Marxist. You are some kind of special.

Obviously I wounded you deeply in pointing out your lacunae.

That explains your attempt to 'get even' with this post.

It fell flat.

Consider yourself dismissed.

Get even? You showed how hypocritical you are. It is idiotic to argue that socialism and Marxism are the devil, and then you post a quote from a MARXIST to support your position. I hate to tell you, but I don't post to get your approval, so telling me it fell flat means about the same as your post from a Marxist.

 

[task0778]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

Tennessee v. Garner , 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment , when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

As I said, when the guy leans into his car like that, the cop does not know if the guy is going for a weapon, which could be considered probable cause.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

Tennessee v. Garner , 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment , when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

As I said, when the guy leans into his car like that, the cop does not know if the guy is going for a weapon, which could be considered probable cause.

He was unarmed and was not an imminent threat to the officers or society. The officers were called to the house for a domestic dispute between 2 women. There were more than enough police there to subdue the man or use less than lethal ways to stop him from getting into the truck. instead he shot him SEVEN times at point blank range in the back.

 

[Hossfly]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Cop made a split second decision as the guy could have been reaching for a gun. Should have shot him in the ass.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You gotta admit the Dems did a hell of a job of snowjobing and ruining a race of people.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

Tennessee v. Garner , 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment , when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

As I said, when the guy leans into his car like that, the cop does not know if the guy is going for a weapon, which could be considered probable cause.

He was unarmed and was not an imminent threat to the officers or society. The officers were called to the house for a domestic dispute between 2 women. There were more than enough police there to subdue the man or use less than lethal ways to stop him from getting into the truck. instead he shot him SEVEN times at point blank range in the back.

It looks bad. Why are these bad cops always in Dem cities??..Always!!

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Give it a break PoleChick. We get it. You don‘t like Democrats. You post the same shit every single day. Get yourself a hobby. You need one desperately.

Laughing at the left is great hobby.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It is clear that the Democrat braintrust decided encouraging, releasing, and protecting the looters, arsonists, thugs, and anarko-communist hordes onto America's streets would cow the populace into voting against Trump.


Now....they recognize their huggggggge mistake.

View attachment 379179

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

In the name of Black Lives Matter, rioters shut down the streets in Kenosha, Wisc., setting trucks on fire, patrolling the streets with semi-automatic rifles, and ransacking nearby businesses. The riot followed the release of a viral video showing Kenosha police repeatedly shooting a black man who resisted arrest and reached into his truck. The man, identified as 29-year-old Jacob Blake, appears to have a violent history. Blake is in critical condition at a nearby hospital, according to police. "

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

pjmedia.com

And now they're having their "What have I done????" moment.


"Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man

Wisconsin governor Tony Evers ordered 125 National Guard members to the city of Kenosha on Monday, following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

The guard members will be charged with “guarding infrastructure and making sure our firefighters and others involved are protected,” Evers told reporters."

Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man | National Review

His decision comes following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

www.nationalreview.com

The only hope in this post is that the Democrat establishment may recognize and jettison the savages that they have allowed to take over a once fine party.

DHS is invoking the Insurrection Act... This means these national guard personnel will be armed now.. Looking for a link... This also makes every arrest a federal charge...

Just wow.... And at the beginning of the republican convention... now who could have not seen this one coming?