A Day Late And A Dollar Short

[initforme]

The electorate will re elect trump. I don't understand all the nervousness. There really is no electoral path Biden has a shot at.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

Tennessee v. Garner , 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment , when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

As I said, when the guy leans into his car like that, the cop does not know if the guy is going for a weapon, which could be considered probable cause.

He was unarmed and was not an imminent threat to the officers or society. The officers were called to the house for a domestic dispute between 2 women. There were more than enough police there to subdue the man or use less than lethal ways to stop him from getting into the truck. instead he shot him SEVEN times at point blank range in the back.

It looks bad. Why are these bad cops always in Dem cities??..Always!!

A Dem city? Wisconsin is a purple state and the party in power is always changing.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car you go butt first rather than head first.

Read the Supreme Court Case of Garner v. TN.

Tennessee v. Garner , 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment , when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."

As I said, when the guy leans into his car like that, the cop does not know if the guy is going for a weapon, which could be considered probable cause.

He was unarmed and was not an imminent threat to the officers or society. The officers were called to the house for a domestic dispute between 2 women. There were more than enough police there to subdue the man or use less than lethal ways to stop him from getting into the truck. instead he shot him SEVEN times at point blank range in the back.

It looks bad. Why are these bad cops always in Dem cities??..Always!!

A Dem city? Wisconsin is a purple state and the party in power is always changing.

Sure. And I just saw the Easter Bunny.

Election Results | Kenosha County, WI - Official Website

www.kenoshacounty.org

 

[Tax Man]

It is clear that the Democrat braintrust decided encouraging, releasing, and protecting the looters, arsonists, thugs, and anarko-communist hordes onto America's streets would cow the populace into voting against Trump.


Now....they recognize their huggggggge mistake.

View attachment 379179

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

In the name of Black Lives Matter, rioters shut down the streets in Kenosha, Wisc., setting trucks on fire, patrolling the streets with semi-automatic rifles, and ransacking nearby businesses. The riot followed the release of a viral video showing Kenosha police repeatedly shooting a black man who resisted arrest and reached into his truck. The man, identified as 29-year-old Jacob Blake, appears to have a violent history. Blake is in critical condition at a nearby hospital, according to police. "

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

pjmedia.com

And now they're having their "What have I done????" moment.


"Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man

Wisconsin governor Tony Evers ordered 125 National Guard members to the city of Kenosha on Monday, following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

The guard members will be charged with “guarding infrastructure and making sure our firefighters and others involved are protected,” Evers told reporters."

Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man | National Review

His decision comes following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

www.nationalreview.com

The only hope in this post is that the Democrat establishment may recognize and jettison the savages that they have allowed to take over a once fine party.

We'll find more of this the closer we get to November.
Dems know damn good and well the average American finds this kind of behavior reprehensible but they let it go on so they wouldnt alienate the radical left voters.
The typical last minute move to the center trick that they hope stupid Americans will fall for yet again.

The repukes are the ones using this in the hopes of getting dems to go for repuke candidates.

 

[Tax Man]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car; you go butt first rather than head first. Waiting to see if the guy has a gun can get you killed if you're a cop.

The video I saw shows the man going to get his paperwork for the policeman.

 

[Gdjjr]

I am a card-carrying pessimist,

You're a card carrying intellectuslly dishonest Republican hack.

 

[task0778]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car; you go butt first rather than head first. Waiting to see if the guy has a gun can get you killed if you're a cop.

The video I saw shows the man going to get his paperwork for the policeman.

Paperwork? That's a new one, when did you see any paperwork? Show me that video, I'd like to see it. On the face of it, this shooting looks like it was unjustified; most people are not too thrilled to see a cop shoot somebody in the back 7 times. But to me it looked like the guy was reaching for something and the cop believed it could be a weapon, maybe he even sees the weapon. What does the cop know that we don't? The story goes that the black guy is trying to stop an altercation between two women, so why are the cops pointing weapons at the guy? Is he wanted for something? Does he have record that includes using a weapon?

The guy was unarmed when he leans into the car, but at that point the cop does not know if the guy has armed himself. He does know that the guy has ignored repeated instructions to stop, possibly to be detained for some reason. The guy has kids in the car, why doesn't he do as he's told; stop and turn around and put his hands on his head? We don't now yet, but simple logic tells me he has a reason not to surrender.

I see this as another unfortunate case where a black guy resists arrest and gets himself shot. I think he bears as much responsibility for what happened as the cop does. Last I heard, he's in stable condition so that's good. If you got nothing to hide then why are you endangering yourself? That does not mitigate the possibility that the cop over-reacted. Don't these guys have stun guns? If not, why not?

Some say the cops should have waited to see if the guy had a gun first. But I don't think so, if I'm a cop and I tell you to stop and turn around and you keep going to your car and then you lean into the car to reach for something and I can't see what it is, then I ain't waiting for you to turn around and shoot me.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car; you go butt first rather than head first. Waiting to see if the guy has a gun can get you killed if you're a cop.

The video I saw shows the man going to get his paperwork for the policeman.

Paperwork? That's a new one, when did you see any paperwork? Show me that video, I'd like to see it. On the face of it, this shooting looks like it was unjustified; most people are not too thrilled to see a cop shoot somebody in the back 7 times. But to me it looked like the guy was reaching for something and the cop believed it could be a weapon, maybe he even sees the weapon. What does the cop know that we don't? The story goes that the black guy is trying to stop an altercation between two women, so why are the cops pointing weapons at the guy? Is he wanted for something? Does he have record that includes using a weapon?

The guy was unarmed when he leans into the car, but at that point the cop does not know if the guy has armed himself. He does know that the guy has ignored repeated instructions to stop, possibly to be detained for some reason. The guy has kids in the car, why doesn't he do as he's told; stop and turn around and put his hands on his head? We don't now yet, but simple logic tells me he has a reason not to surrender.

I see this as another unfortunate case where a black guy resists arrest and gets himself shot. I think he bears as much responsibility for what happened as the cop does. Last I heard, he's in stable condition so that's good. If you got nothing to hide then why are you endangering yourself? That does not mitigate the possibility that the cop over-reacted. Don't these guys have stun guns? If not, why not?

Some say the cops should have waited to see if the guy had a gun first. But I don't think so, if I'm a cop and I tell you to stop and turn around and you keep going to your car and then you lean into the car to reach for something and I can't see what it is, then I ain't waiting for you to turn around and shoot me.

You can't use deadly force on someone you don't know if they are armed or not. End of story. It is the law. Let's not even get into shooting someone SEVEN times in the back. I'm amazed the guy is still alive.

 

[IM2]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

 

[IM2]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

Here's the thing: does the cop know the black guy is unarmed when he appears to be reaching for something? I've seen that video, and that's not the way you get into your car; you go butt first rather than head first. Waiting to see if the guy has a gun can get you killed if you're a cop.

The video I saw shows the man going to get his paperwork for the policeman.

Paperwork? That's a new one, when did you see any paperwork? Show me that video, I'd like to see it. On the face of it, this shooting looks like it was unjustified; most people are not too thrilled to see a cop shoot somebody in the back 7 times. But to me it looked like the guy was reaching for something and the cop believed it could be a weapon, maybe he even sees the weapon. What does the cop know that we don't? The story goes that the black guy is trying to stop an altercation between two women, so why are the cops pointing weapons at the guy? Is he wanted for something? Does he have record that includes using a weapon?

The guy was unarmed when he leans into the car, but at that point the cop does not know if the guy has armed himself. He does know that the guy has ignored repeated instructions to stop, possibly to be detained for some reason. The guy has kids in the car, why doesn't he do as he's told; stop and turn around and put his hands on his head? We don't now yet, but simple logic tells me he has a reason not to surrender.

I see this as another unfortunate case where a black guy resists arrest and gets himself shot. I think he bears as much responsibility for what happened as the cop does. Last I heard, he's in stable condition so that's good. If you got nothing to hide then why are you endangering yourself? That does not mitigate the possibility that the cop over-reacted. Don't these guys have stun guns? If not, why not?

Some say the cops should have waited to see if the guy had a gun first. But I don't think so, if I'm a cop and I tell you to stop and turn around and you keep going to your car and then you lean into the car to reach for something and I can't see what it is, then I ain't waiting for you to turn around and shoot me.

Bullshit.

 

[eagle1462010]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

Think Progress Rag article...................LMAO

Why after blacks moved into my neighborhood did it turn into a shit hole...........not to mention the other house of mother n law that they burned down.....after she left......and after they killed the neighbor for his drugs in his bed............

You educate no one

 

[IM2]

Police just shot up a man for no reason. People are tired of that. So posting pictures of riots followed by disingenuous accusation that excuse police is going to insure the revolution will get nastier.

 

[eagle1462010]

Police just shot up a man for no reason. People are tired of that. So posting pictures of riots followed by disingenuous accusation that excuse police is going to insure the revolution will get nastier.

That justifies looting and burning the city huh...........and stealing the cash registers........that will honor the dead.

 

[IM2]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

Think Progress Rag article...................LMAO

Why after blacks moved into my neighborhood did it turn into a shit hole...........not to mention the other house of mother n law that they burned down.....after she left......and after they killed the neighbor for his drugs in his bed............

You educate no one

I don't think think it did. So again I am black. I know what you you say doesn't apply to all blacks or black communities. So take your anecdote elsewhere.

 

[IM2]

Police just shot up a man for no reason. People are tired of that. So posting pictures of riots followed by disingenuous accusation that excuse police is going to insure the revolution will get nastier.

That justifies looting and burning the city huh...........and stealing the cash registers........that will honor the dead.

Whites have rioted after running out of pumpkins and after winning sporting events. Fuck off.

 

[eagle1462010]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

Think Progress Rag article...................LMAO

Why after blacks moved into my neighborhood did it turn into a shit hole...........not to mention the other house of mother n law that they burned down.....after she left......and after they killed the neighbor for his drugs in his bed............

You educate no one

I don't think think it did. So again I am black. I know what you you say doesn't apply to all blacks or black communities. So take your anecdote elsewhere.

I know it did.........I lived it............why.........no crime before......was a nice place.........everyone in our family wanted to buy it after my parents died...........but no one would do it because the neighborhood was too bad........

Why should I give a damn what you say...........not to mention what happened to our mother n law........we had weapons when we moved her..............

Why is that.????????

 

[eagle1462010]

Police just shot up a man for no reason. People are tired of that. So posting pictures of riots followed by disingenuous accusation that excuse police is going to insure the revolution will get nastier.

That justifies looting and burning the city huh...........and stealing the cash registers........that will honor the dead.

Whites have rioted after running out of pumpkins and after winning sporting events. Fuck off.

BS.............your side is killing police........burning and looting...........King isn't proud of you.......he rolled over in his grave because of you.

 

[danielpalos]

It is clear that the Democrat braintrust decided encouraging, releasing, and protecting the looters, arsonists, thugs, and anarko-communist hordes onto America's streets would cow the populace into voting against Trump.


Now....they recognize their huggggggge mistake.

View attachment 379179

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

In the name of Black Lives Matter, rioters shut down the streets in Kenosha, Wisc., setting trucks on fire, patrolling the streets with semi-automatic rifles, and ransacking nearby businesses. The riot followed the release of a viral video showing Kenosha police repeatedly shooting a black man who resisted arrest and reached into his truck. The man, identified as 29-year-old Jacob Blake, appears to have a violent history. Blake is in critical condition at a nearby hospital, according to police. "

'Like a Scene Out of Hell': Armed BLM Rioters Loot, Pillage, and Burn Kenosha Following Police Shooting

pjmedia.com

And now they're having their "What have I done????" moment.


"Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man

Wisconsin governor Tony Evers ordered 125 National Guard members to the city of Kenosha on Monday, following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

The guard members will be charged with “guarding infrastructure and making sure our firefighters and others involved are protected,” Evers told reporters."

Wisconsin Governor Calls in National Guard following Rioting Sparked by Police Shooting of Black Man | National Review

His decision comes following riots that erupted after police shot a black man while responding to a domestic violence call on Sunday.

www.nationalreview.com

The only hope in this post is that the Democrat establishment may recognize and jettison the savages that they have allowed to take over a once fine party.

This is the common Law for the common defense right wingers.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Obey the laws!

 

[Lewdog]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

Think Progress Rag article...................LMAO

Why after blacks moved into my neighborhood did it turn into a shit hole...........not to mention the other house of mother n law that they burned down.....after she left......and after they killed the neighbor for his drugs in his bed............

You educate no one

I don't think think it did. So again I am black. I know what you you say doesn't apply to all blacks or black communities. So take your anecdote elsewhere.

I know it did.........I lived it............why.........no crime before......was a nice place.........everyone in our family wanted to buy it after my parents died...........but no one would do it because the neighborhood was too bad........

Why should I give a damn what you say...........not to mention what happened to our mother n law........we had weapons when we moved her..............

Why is that.????????

Wait, how do we know your neighborhood hadn't become a shithole and that is why a Black family moved in?

 

[eagle1462010]

Oh it is definitely the Democrats fault a white cop shot an unarmed Blackman in the back 7 times while surrounded by several other officers. View attachment 379182

It's not the Republicans fault that happened either... so both parties need to fix the problem, not blame each other for it.

And here is my analysis of the problem.

There was a time when black Americans were brought up in homes with two parents, I believe I read that at one point had a higher in wedlock birthrate than whites. All changed when Democrats pretended to trying to help this group, whose votes they desired.

So….when the culture veered from the acceptable, Liberals/Democrats treated them as a parent who spoils wayward offspring.

Out of wedlock births…..just fine.

Crime….make excuses for it.

A violent and anti-social culture? Must be due to racial oppression.



Now, if one imagines that the pathologies holding blacks back are inherent, genetic….guess again.

Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”



The only question is, whether the debilitation can be reversed.

You really need to shut your Asian ass up about black families bitch.

Todays lesson:

"Shutting up the mouths of racist Korean bitches pertaining to fake black pathologies."

On June 8, 2015, Charles Blow wrote an article in the New York Times titled, “Black Dads Are Doing Best of All.” McDonald should have read it. This article takes apart the tale of black fathers not being around for their kids. The issue of unwed births really has no relation to whether 2 parents are around. An unwed birth is a child being born and the couple is not married. That does not mean a man and a woman are not together raising the child. The single mother narrative got destroyed long ago, because a single mother does not mean a man will not be around to influence the child as it grows up. One fantastic example is the story Shaquille O’Neill tells about his relationship with Sergeant Phillip Harrison who raised him with his mother. Finally, the appearance of Barack Obama on the world stage allows me to say once and for all that a single parent family is not the cause of the problem. This article shows that the majority of black children in this country live with their fathers or their fathers are active participants in their lives. In reality, not the convoluted racist mind, a mother and father ARE present in the majority of black homes.

Josh Levs points this out in his new book, “All In,” in a chapter titled “How Black Dads Are Doing Best of All (But There’s Still a Crisis).” One fact that Levs quickly establishes is that most black fathers in America live with their children: “There are about 2.5 million black fathers living with their children and about 1.7 million living apart from them.”

Charles Blow​

A report titled “Fathers’ Involvement With Their Children: United States, 2006–2010,” was published by the Centers for Disease Control in the National Health Report on December 20, 2013. The findings are interesting for those who have decided they can paint black culture in moral terms. Moral terms that 244 years of American history show whites who have decided they can do the painting, refuse hold themselves to. The findings in this study debunk the standard racist white narrative to the point that it is miseducation, misinformation, lies, or whatever word you want to give to the purposeful deception provided to describe a race of people. Some of the findings are as follows:

A higher percentage of fathers who lived with their children under age 5 fed or ate meals with them daily—72% compared with 7.9% of fathers with noncoresidential children. A higher percentage of fathers living apart from their children did not feed or eat meals with them at all in the last 4 weeks—43% compared with 0.8% of fathers with coresidential children (Table 2). Variation by Hispanic origin and race was seen in the percentages of coresidential fathers who ate meals with their children every day. Specifically, Hispanic fathers were less likely to eat meals with their children every day (64%) than were non-Hispanic white (74%) or non-Hispanic black (78%) fathers.

There was a significant difference by Hispanic origin and race among fathers with coresidential children: Black fathers (70%) were most likely to have bathed, dressed, diapered, or helped their children use the toilet every day compared with white (60%) and Hispanic fathers (45%).

A higher percentage of Hispanic fathers aged 15–44 (52%) had not played with their noncoresidential children in the last 4 weeks compared with white (30%) and black (25%) fathers.

Larger percentages of Hispanic (82%) and white (70%) fathers had not helped their noncoresidential children with homework at all in the last 4 weeks compared with black fathers (56%).

Pew Research estimates that 67 percent of black dads who don’t live with their kids see them at least once a month, compared to 59 percent of white dads and 32 percent of Hispanic dads. Evidence shows that a number of black dads living apart from their kids because of structural systems of inequality and poverty, not the unfounded racist assumption that African-American men place less or no value on parenting. Black and white fathers agree on the importance of being a father who provides emotional support, instills discipline and moral guidance. Black dads are also more likely to think it is important to provide for his children financially.

Simply put, the unwed, single mom, absent black father is not the cause of crime or violence in black communities. Single mothers have boyfriends, this seems to be ignored and it should not be. Furthermore, whites commit more crimes and that includes violent crimes. Perhaps it is time whites started talking a good long look into their own communities instead of continuing the American tradition of making up stories about how violent and criminal other races are. The question NEVER gets raised by anyone white such as McDonald and our Korean neo nazi as to why whites lead every year in arrests in 90 percent of all crime categories.

“From 1994 to 2015, white-on-white violence (down 79%) and black-on-black violence (down 78%) declined at a similar rate.”

This bit of information comes from a report issued in October of 2017 by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The title is, “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.” This report shows that for a 21 year period of time, while people like Poli chic, most of the Fox News prime time lineup, Trump and most of the American media were promoting a narrative of high black on black crime, the reality is that black on black crime was being reduced. It also shows that most crimes are intra-racial and that whites were victimized by other whites primarily and at approximately the same percentage.

“During 2012-15, there were no differences among white, black, and Hispanic intraracial victimizations reported to police.”

These facts show the utter silliness and nonsense poli chic and whites like her share relative to the issue of black on black crime. This information shows that black on black crime had been actually reduced over a 2-decade span and that was due to the very hard work of unknown, not so famous blacks toiling in obscurity in cities/towns all over this country. These are the stories that rarely get told by the media. Instead space is wasted with the opinion of MacDonald and that ilk.

On August 15, 2013, The Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice published a paper by Mike Males entitled, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests.” The data was basically ignored, even by President Obama. But the implications of this study were so important that it was a dereliction of duty to not make this information widely known to the American public.

Americans tend to create nostalgia about the past. The fact is that the good old days never were. I say that as a black citizen of this country, but the good old days never existed for anyone. Males points this out in his report. “For nearly all serious and minor offenses, including homicide, rates among black teenagers nationally were lower in 2011 than when racial statistics were first collected nationally in 1964. Black youths’ murder arrest rates are considerably lower today than back when Bill Cosby was funny (long, long ago).

We don’t associate Jim and Margaret Anderson’s 1950s cherubs with juvenile crime—but that’s based on nostalgia and cultural biases, not fact. Back then, nearly 1 in 10 youth were arrested every year; today, around 3 in 100. Limited statistics of the 1950s show juvenile crime wasn’t just pranks and joyriding; “younger and younger children” are committing “the most wanton and senseless of murders… and mass rape,” the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency warned in 1956.” Whoa! Hold up! Stop! Does this mean that “super predators” existed in the 1950’s? I guess this explains Eddie Haskell. Males presents a point here that requires further investigating.

Our Korean nazi consistently present what is a prevailing opinion held by whites primarily on the right. However, I have heard that same opinion from a few whites who consider themselves liberals. It is the blacks face problems because of unwed births claim. The claim that black youth are unruly because there is no father at home. Individuals making this argument of all races wax nostalgic back to days they claim where all families were the classic mom and dad style. More than once I have been told how blacks did not suffer from the violence and poverty we do today because daddy was living in the house. Mind you, these were white or wannabe white suburban citizens telling me this. When I say they were suburban citizens, I am saying they were born in the suburbs, grew up in the suburbs, got a nice cushy job and purchased property in newer suburban developments where they live today.

The problem with that opinion is that it is untrue. Congressional committees and subcommittees met in the 1940’s and 1950’s to discuss youth violence resulting from reading violent stories in comic books. Superman, Batman, Aqua Man, Captain America and whoever else was a member of the Justice League, were held responsible for the outrageously high rate of violent juvenile delinquency during that period. On June 1, 1953, the United States Senate adopted Senate Resolution 89. This resolution authorized the Senate Judiciary Committee or subcommittees authorized by the Judiciary Committee to study juvenile delinquency in the United States. The primary focus of this study: “(1) determining the extent and character of juvenile delinquency in the United States and its causes and contributing factors, (2) the adequacy of existing Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, "(3) sentences imposed on, or other correctional action taken with respect to, youthful offenders by Federal laws dealing with youthful offenders, and (4) the extent to which juveniles are violating Federal laws relating to the sale or use of narcotics.”

Let us take a look at some of the findings. “In the 8-year period, from 1948 through 1956, juvenile court cases more than doubled while the child population of that age group increased only 19 percent. As in previous years, the increase is at a much greater rate in rural areas than in urban areas, and the ratio of 5 boy delinquents to eyery 1 girl delinquent is still in evidence.”

“In the year 1956, there were upwards of 1,300,000 boys and girls coming to the attention of local law-enforcement officers. Approximately one-fourth of the police cases are referred to juvenile courts. The remaining juvenile court cases are referred from individuals and other agencies in. the community.”

From 1948 until 1956, juvenile crime rose in rural areas. Juvenile crime was rising faster than juvenile population growth. This was primarily happening in white communities. With mom and pops at home. Before the sexual revolution. Back in the day as we say, the switchblade knife was the cause of a lot of deaths and suffering. There are similarities to the proliferation of switchblade knives in the 1940-1950’s and the increase in military style weapons used on our streets today.

“Of the robberies committed in 1956, 43.2 percent were by persons under 21 years of age. A switchblade knife 1s frequently part of the perpetrator's equipment in this type of crime. In New York City alone in 1956, there was an increase of 92.1 percent of those under 16 arrested for the possession of dangerous weapons, one of the most common of which is the switchblade knife.

Out of several hundred questionnaires sent by the subcommittee to purchasers of switchblade knives, whose names were derived from a distributor's mailing list, 133 responses have been received. Seventy--five percent of the purchasers were under 20 years of age, and of this group, 43 percent were between 11 and 15 years of age. Of the persons responding to the questionnaire, only a small portion claimed that the knives were secured for a constructive purpose.

In addition to the interviews with manufacturers and distributors and the receipt of information from questionnaires, staff contact was made with some of the purchasers in the immediate area and numerous retail stores. The proprietors of these stores conceded that the bulk of the demand for switchblade knives came from juveniles, some as young as 8 or 9 years of age.”

“ A major outlet for the switchblade knife are military supply stores which are located near military installations.”

E-commerce via the internet was 40-50 years in the future at this time. Yet kids could order switchblades by mail or purchase them in military supply stores. Just like military style assault weapons can be purchased today. In 1956, not 1996, or during the period of “American Carnage” inaccurately described by president number 45, 43 percent of the robberies in this country were committed by people under the age of 21. With mom and dad at home. When the family did not consist of couples named Adam and Steve or Joni and Jane. The good old days.

Over 1 million incidents between youth and police. Over 500,000 cases in juvenile courts. From 1948 through 1956, there were annual increases in juvenile cases heard before the courts. The investigation is talking about annual increases in juvenile crime by kids from the ages of 8 to 18. The owners of the military supply stores stated to members of the judiciary committee that the majority of switchblade purchases were made by youth. Elementary school children were walking American streets carrying switchblades. These were the good old days. This was before the Great Society programs that have been blamed for the decay of American society and deemed responsible for the destruction of the black family.

Definition of fact: 1 a : something that has actual existence. b : an actual occurrence. 2 : a piece of information presented as having objective reality. 3: the quality of being actual. 4: a thing done. b archaic : action. c obsolete: feat

I presented that bit of information in order to display just how members of this society have chosen to accept a fictional account of the country we live in. It has been accepted to such an extent that our police departments have become militarized despite a national decrease in crime. It is a lie so tough that innocent blacks posing no threat to anyone end up in funeral homes. Mike Males article provides evidence of how a racist society builds a strawman then tries turning that straw into skin and bones.

“Since the sainted Fifties, America has seen rapid teenage population growth and dramatic shifts toward more single parenting, more lethal drugs and weapons, increased middle-aged (that is, parent-age) drug abuse and imprisonment, decreased incarceration of youth, decreased youthful religious affiliation, and more violent and explicit media available to younger ages. Horrifying, as the culture critics far Right to far Left—including Obama, who spends many pages and speeches berating popular culture as some major driver of bad youth behavior—repeatedly insist.

And after 50 years of all these terrible changes in American culture? Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed.

In the last 20 years in particular, the FBI reports, rates of crime among African American youth have plummeted: All offenses (down 47%), drug offenses (down 50%), property offenses (down 51%), serious Part I offenses (down 53%), assault (down 59%), robbery (down 60%), all violent offenses (down 60%), rape (down 66%), and murder (down 82%).”

Mike Males, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”​

What the article Males wrote did was expose an American pathology concerning race. Specifically, a white racist pathology that needs for there to be an “other” That “other” must always look different from what the so-called white “mainstream” deems to be normal. This applies to more areas than race, but since this book is about racism in 21st century America, I will apply what I am writing about to race.

There has consistently existed a space in white culture where people have believed in the inherent superiority and human perfection of the white race. Included in this space has been a belief in a natural propensity for violence in blacks. Where that belief came from can’t be based in reality. I am assuming since slaves tended to resist their enslavement that white slaveowners decided that since blacks actually enjoyed their enslavement, those who fought were just naturally prone to violence. Such an assumption sounds crazy, right?

It is crazy but that is what scientific racism taught. Today the remnants of such madness continues in books such as “The Bell Curve”, studies such as, “The Color of Crime”, or in the belief that all black men are violent and dangerous. This belief has been maintained for so long that information such as what Males discovered remained outside of mainstream information. For example, when Males published his findings in 2013, he wrote: “FBI clearance and arrest tabulations now indicate black youths under age 18 account for just 2% of the nation’s homicides.” “How did America miss this?” You would think this would be cause for celebration.

I find it laughable what so called “conservatives,” claim the media does not cover. So while people like Limbaugh and most right wing were letting sounds flow from their mouths that reflected long held racist opinions, young blacks were described by Males in this manner: “Today’s young African Americans display the lowest rates of crime and serious risk of any generation that can be reliably assessed..”

The Myth of the Absent Black Father, Tara Culp-Ressler, Think Progress, January 16, 2014, The Myth Of The Absent Black Father

Jo Jones, Ph.D., and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children: United States, 2006–2010, National Health Statistics Report, Number 71, December 20, 2013, Division of Vital
Statistics

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics., “Race and Hispanic Origin of Victims and Offenders, 2012-15.”

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Why the Gigantic, Decades-Long Drop in Black Youth Crime Threatens Major Interests”

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 1, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 2, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Juvenile Delinquency Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, (85th cong., 2d ~ss.), March 27, 1958, pg. 6, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Here endeth the lesson.

Think Progress Rag article...................LMAO

Why after blacks moved into my neighborhood did it turn into a shit hole...........not to mention the other house of mother n law that they burned down.....after she left......and after they killed the neighbor for his drugs in his bed............

You educate no one

I don't think think it did. So again I am black. I know what you you say doesn't apply to all blacks or black communities. So take your anecdote elsewhere.

I know it did.........I lived it............why.........no crime before......was a nice place.........everyone in our family wanted to buy it after my parents died...........but no one would do it because the neighborhood was too bad........

Why should I give a damn what you say...........not to mention what happened to our mother n law........we had weapons when we moved her..............

Why is that.????????

Wait, how do we know your neighborhood hadn't become a shithole and that is why a Black family moved in? View attachment 379291

I don't give a shit what you believe..............that is what happened..........and stats show that shit all over the country.

It happened............so I'm asking this guy why...............It fucked up the place I grew up........and we wanted to buy the house but the crime was too bad.

They burned a house down around the corner.........I knew those people.........before my dad passed away........it had a barn.......they broke everything they could in it..........then took a dolly.......and used it to shred the liner in the inground pool.........they threw the dolly into the pool after...........

The house went for 55k..........after he died.....4 bedrooms.....large kitchen.....2 living rooms....a 15 foot by 40 foot patio ...concrete...........a 20 x 40 2 story barn........and a 20 x 40 inground linered pool.