Just seven?
What a horrible policy.
What a horrible policy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Howsabout people pay the loans they take out and agree to pay off.
Once again you demonstrate you know nothing about America. Bush warned of the housing crisis as far back as 2003. Dimwingers like Bawney Fwank brushed him off.
Are you ever not a lying sack of shit?
Paying off your loans is just for "little people". Keeps them down. Employers weren't required to repay their PPL loans.
Basically, student loans are extortion. You need the degree these days just to get an interview, but the price of a college degree at any of the Ivy League Schools has gone up 10 times, after factoring in inflation, what it was in the 1970's.
Had to stop after your first dumbass sentence so I wouldn’t catch your stupid.Paying off your loans is just for "little people". Keeps them down. Employers weren't required to repay their PPL loans.
Basically, student loans are extortion. You need the degree these days just to get an interview, but the price of a college degree at any of the Ivy League Schools has gone up 10 times, after factoring in inflation, what it was in the 1970's.
Is that why Bush signed the Dream Down Payment Act in 2003, giving out money to first time home buyers to get them to buy houses????
President Bush Signs American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003
President Bush on Tuesday signed into law the American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003, which will help approximately 40,000 families a year with their down payment and closing costs, and further strengthen America's housing market.georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
The "housing crisis" Bush was concerned with was the decline in the percentage of Americans who owned their own homes, not the housing bubble his low interest rate policies were creating.
Those businesses provide jobs so that people can earn a living and pay taxes for all the things you mentioned on top of what companies pay. Truck drivers pay much of the road taxes that we pass on to those industries so they do end up paying for those roads and bridges that the Communists want to tear down because they deemed them racist. The top 20% of our wage earners pay over 80% of the federal income tax collected, so don't start that BS they don't pay their fair share.
The reason the Communists never touched any Reagan policies is because they worked, not because they were just too busy to change them. They got Commie Care passed without one Republican supporting it. But what should I expect from the anti-white party of excuses?
Abbot could concentrate more on his state if Dementia wasn't bringing in illegals by the millions. Texas has to deal with the problem by the thousands every month. They sent 50 of them to liberal Martha's Vineyard and they thought it was the end of the Fn world. Maybe then Abbot could concentrate on those blue cities where all the crimes occur if we had a President that actually did his job.
Those businesses provide jobs so that people can earn a living and pay taxes for all the things you mentioned on top of what companies pay. Truck drivers pay much of the road taxes that we pass on to those industries so they do end up paying for those roads and bridges that the Communists want to tear down because they deemed them racist. The top 20% of our wage earners pay over 80% of the federal income tax collected, so don't start that BS they don't pay their fair share.
The reason the Communists never touched any Reagan policies is because they worked, not because they were just too busy to change them. They got Commie Care passed without one Republican supporting it. But what should I expect from the anti-white party of excuses?
Abbot could concentrate more on his state if Dementia wasn't bringing in illegals by the millions. Texas has to deal with the problem by the thousands every month. They sent 50 of them to liberal Martha's Vineyard and they thought it was the end of the Fn world. Maybe then Abbot could concentrate on those blue cities where all the crimes occur if we had a President that actually did his job.
. It was going to cost the City of New York $9 billion to create the infrastructure investment needed to service Amazon.Stop drinking the Republican Kool-Aid, Ray. The top 20% are getting 80% of the wealth of the nation now - the greatest wage and wealth inequity in the first world.
Businesses are the greatest consumers of government services and investment in the USA. It was going to cost the City of New York $9 billion to create the infrastructure investment needed to service Amazon. Yet Amazon was expected to pay for NONE of that. Let the working people of New York pay for it.
This is why your infrastructure is crumbling. Nobody wanted to pay for it.
Reagan's policies lead to 3 economic crashes in 40 years.Reagan's policies lead to 3 economic crashes in 40 years. That hasn't happened in any other first world country.
If Reagan's policies worked, you wouldn't have the greatest wealth and income inequity in the First World.
Reagan's taxation policies haven't been changed because the Democrats haven't had 60 Senators to do it.
Reagan's policies lead to 3 economic crashes in 40 years. That hasn't happened in any other first world country.
If Reagan's policies worked, you wouldn't have the greatest wealth and income inequity in the First World.
Reagan's taxation policies haven't been changed because the Democrats haven't had 60 Senators to do it.
Stop drinking the Republican Kool-Aid, Ray. The top 20% are getting 80% of the wealth of the nation now - the greatest wage and wealth inequity in the first world.
Businesses are the greatest consumers of government services and investment in the USA. It was going to cost the City of New York $9 billion to create the infrastructure investment needed to service Amazon. Yet Amazon was expected to pay for NONE of that. Let the working people of New York pay for it.
This is why your infrastructure is crumbling. Nobody wanted to pay for it.
They are tax payers too, and will continue to be at a higher level than most, for the rest of their lives.Paying off loans is not a win, it's a loss to taxpayers. There is nothing warranted about this. You took out the loan, you signed the papers agreeing to repay that loan, and now you must do as you promised. It doesn't get much simpler than that.
When you start quoting AOC, we know you have no idea what you're talking about.
Amazon got a tax abatement. Abatements are used to draw businesses (and jobs) to an area. It wasn't going to cost NYC a dime.
And why should those people take money out of MY pocket?Thanks Republicans. You’re taking money out of the pockets of struggling middle class folks
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...............Those meanies are fighting back! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!It IS just mean.
We have a double digit trillion dollar debt and THIS 40 billion a year is the hill Republicans want to die on?
The government picking and choosing winners. (despite the fact you know it wasn't all tax incentives).
It's not picking winners and losers. It's attracting industry to an area. Governors and cities compete against each other for the business and that's a good thing.
They are tax payers too, and will continue to be at a higher level than most, for the rest of their lives.
Somebody, is always getting some thing from our taxes that we pay, that we ourselves didn't benefit from, or get.
And some time in our lifetime, we may get something from our taxes as a benefit, like disability, or unemployment, or a VA loan, or good roads when those who don't drive don't benefit, and numerous other perks that many other taxpayers never got....
I'm not certain this will meet constitutional muster, but if it does, I'm ok with it....though we still need reform.
Having tax payers pick up the costs of your business = good thing.
Having tax payers pick up some of your higher education costs = bad thing.
Abatements are not the taxpayer picking up anything. The city just won't get the tax collection they would get without a break, but it will bring jobs which the city will be collecting taxes from.
Yes, vote buying is always a bad thing when taxpayers are paying for it. If the Communists want to buy votes, let them do it with their own money--not ours.
The city was on the hook for all kinds of expenses. They had to completely rework the waterfront for Amazon. But we have discussed this before and you are aware of this but as is generally the case, you have no qualms repeating things you know are not true.