LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?Another great success by Obama! One of the five Taliban commanders traded for a deserter is back in action. But after all, As Ambassador Rice said, Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction."
Officials Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities - CNN.com
I did see on Fox news that the DOD officially denied that any of the five had returned to action, only that one of them had been contacted by ISIS. Ambassador Rice is an idiot. Now the germs come out of the wall and say 'this confused kid' didn't desert. Bergdahl was a 23 year old PFC and was not a 'kid.' He was a deserter and when the military says "we leave no man behind," that does not include deserters.
What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.