Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?Another great success by Obama! One of the five Taliban commanders traded for a deserter is back in action. But after all, As Ambassador Rice said, Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction."
Officials Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities - CNN.com
I did see on Fox news that the DOD officially denied that any of the five had returned to action, only that one of them had been contacted by ISIS. Ambassador Rice is an idiot. Now the germs come out of the wall and say 'this confused kid' didn't desert. Bergdahl was a 23 year old PFC and was not a 'kid.' He was a deserter and when the military says "we leave no man behind," that does not include deserters.
What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
Listen to the report and stop being such a hack. This was a clusterfuck of a decision and there is no way to spin much of anything. It makes Obama look terrible and you a bottom-feeding hack.No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Listen to the report and stop being such a hack. This was a clusterfuck of a decision and there is no way to spin much of anything. It makes Obama look terrible and you a bottom-feeding hack.No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?Another great success by Obama! One of the five Taliban commanders traded for a deserter is back in action. But after all, As Ambassador Rice said, Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction."
Officials Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities - CNN.com
I did see on Fox news that the DOD officially denied that any of the five had returned to action, only that one of them had been contacted by ISIS. Ambassador Rice is an idiot. Now the germs come out of the wall and say 'this confused kid' didn't desert. Bergdahl was a 23 year old PFC and was not a 'kid.' He was a deserter and when the military says "we leave no man behind," that does not include deserters.
What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
When will you stop sucking on Obama's ball, even after an obvious clusterfuck? These bastards will be out of Qatar in May anyway, and they're champing at the bit to kill Americans, stone women for adultery and all that other fun stuff. They have started early.Listen to the report and stop being such a hack. This was a clusterfuck of a decision and there is no way to spin much of anything. It makes Obama look terrible and you a bottom-feeding hack.No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Do you have any idea how the decision to make the exchange for Bergdahl was made? How long the negotiations took? Who was involved?
Are you aware of protocol when it comes to prisoners of war?
All Bergdahl has to do is go on FOX and say that he hates Obama and you'd be sucking his balls and donating to his legal fund. Dickhead.
Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?Another great success by Obama! One of the five Taliban commanders traded for a deserter is back in action. But after all, As Ambassador Rice said, Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction."
Officials Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities - CNN.com
I did see on Fox news that the DOD officially denied that any of the five had returned to action, only that one of them had been contacted by ISIS. Ambassador Rice is an idiot. Now the germs come out of the wall and say 'this confused kid' didn't desert. Bergdahl was a 23 year old PFC and was not a 'kid.' He was a deserter and when the military says "we leave no man behind," that does not include deserters.
What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
When will you stop sucking on Obama's ball, even after an obvious clusterfuck? These bastards will be out of Qatar in May any, and they're champing at the bit to kill Americans, stone women for adultery and all that other fun stuff. They have started early.Listen to the report and stop being such a hack. This was a clusterfuck of a decision and there is no way to spin much of anything. It makes Obama look terrible and you a bottom-feeding hack.No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Do you have any idea how the decision to make the exchange for Bergdahl was made? How long the negotiations took? Who was involved?
Are you aware of protocol when it comes to prisoners of war?
All Bergdahl has to do is go on FOX and say that he hates Obama and you'd be sucking his balls and donating to his legal fund. Dickhead.
Are you seriously that stupid? Never mind, I have an amazing grasp of the obvious.Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?I did see on Fox news that the DOD officially denied that any of the five had returned to action, only that one of them had been contacted by ISIS. Ambassador Rice is an idiot. Now the germs come out of the wall and say 'this confused kid' didn't desert. Bergdahl was a 23 year old PFC and was not a 'kid.' He was a deserter and when the military says "we leave no man behind," that does not include deserters.
What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Nope. Nothing criminal was done by any regime.
I think it's funny that you are citing US civilian criminal law here. It really makes you look like an idiot.
None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight. None have engaged in militant activities. There are consequences for doing so.
Are you seriously that stupid? Never mind, I have an amazing grasp of the obvious.Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.Who said rejoined the fight, although that could be argued. CNN reported "returned to militant activities". What the hell do you think that means?What? You mean the OP is misleading? None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight? Is that the case?
No, retard. The CNN piece said "suspected". It also gives a fairly detailed explanation of what that means in this case.
The former detainee hasn't actually done anything.
The OP is misleading and the replies to it are as predictable as ever. USMB nutters are idiots.
Nope. Nothing criminal was done by any regime.
I think it's funny that you are citing US civilian criminal law here. It really makes you look like an idiot.
None of the "Taliban 5" have rejoined the fight. None have engaged in militant activities. There are consequences for doing so.
Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.
Released convicts on parole are forbidden to make contact with their gang. That is exactly what he was doing. You people twist yourselves into pretzels to support the criminal actions of this regime.
Except these guys were never 'convicted' of anything. We never charged them. They never actually committed crimes against the United States or against American interests.
We held them as "combantants", but we did not afford them the legal protections of prisoners of war. (Then we'd have to explain the other things we were doing, like the torture.)
They should follow the lead of Cadiz Prison
Open up the flood gates and off to sea they go.
-Geaux
Oh, that's right. The good guys were the ones giving sanctuary to bin Laden and publicly stoning women to death for adultery.Um, yeah. Because we are the "Good guys' in this war.
Oh, that's right. The good guys were the ones giving sanctuary to bin Laden and publicly stoning women to death for adultery.Um, yeah. Because we are the "Good guys' in this war.
Oh, that's right. The good guys were the ones giving sanctuary to bin Laden and publicly stoning women to death for adultery.Um, yeah. Because we are the "Good guys' in this war.
NO, the good guys were the ones who shouldn't be torturing people, shouldn't be attacking countries on the basis of lies and shouldn't be carpet bombing civilians.
Again, you can't claim to be the good guys when you engage in equally bad behavior.
Joey, you should be too old to be that stupid. Alas, in your world the good guys are the ones who give you food stamps, not those who pay for them.Oh, that's right. The good guys were the ones giving sanctuary to bin Laden and publicly stoning women to death for adultery.Um, yeah. Because we are the "Good guys' in this war.
NO, the good guys were the ones who shouldn't be torturing people, shouldn't be attacking countries on the basis of lies and shouldn't be carpet bombing civilians.
Again, you can't claim to be the good guys when you engage in equally bad behavior.
Another great success by Obama! One of the five Taliban commanders traded for a deserter is back in action. But after all, As Ambassador Rice said, Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction."
Officials Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities - CNN.com
Joey, you should be too old to be that stupid. Alas, in your world the good guys are the ones who give you food stamps, not those who pay for them.
Fordham University law professor Thane Rosenbaum argues in his radical new book, Payback: The Case for Revenge, that the desire to get even is an indelible part of our nature, and that it’s nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, he says, we’d all be better off if society makes a place for revenge in our legal system, accepting it as an integral part of justice. Using examples from history, mythology, popular culture and recent events—such as the widely-celebrated killing of Osama bin Laden—Rosenbaum asks us to “give revenge a chance.”
