Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Banned
- #101
So the WND conclusion is, if you're a boy and you don't want to be gay, don't eat soy products.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.
Damn, excellent point. Maybe they are shovel ready gays.It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.
How do you know they're not closet gays?
Did I say that? Nope.
You said you wouldn't entertain such a 'juvenile conclusion'. So what is it? Do you always reject a study that has a 'juvenile conclusion' or are you a troll? The world is waiting.
Maybe not the world but possibly a few people that have been following the thread, but I'm sure even that number is dwindling as YWN makes his or herself less relevant with every post.
It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.
What's the scientific evidence?It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.
That's addressed in the various articles from the OP and in the references.
So the WND conclusion is, if you're a boy and you don't want to be gay, don't eat soy products.
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
So the WND conclusion is, if you're a boy and you don't want to be gay, don't eat soy products.
That's not at all what it says. Here's basically what it says:
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
So the WND conclusion is, if you're a boy and you don't want to be gay, don't eat soy products.
That's not at all what it says. Here's basically what it says:
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
Yeah, that's why the title of the WND article is "Soy makes you gay".
Yeah, that's why the title of the WND article is "Soy makes you gay".
What's the scientific evidence?It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.
That's addressed in the various articles from the OP and in the references.
So the WND conclusion is, if you're a boy and you don't want to be gay, don't eat soy products.
That's not at all what it says. Here's basically what it says:
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
Yeah, that's why the title of the WND article is "Soy makes you gay".
That's not at all what it says. Here's basically what it says:
Yeah, that's why the title of the WND article is "Soy makes you gay".
Everyone knows WND is biased. That's not the question. And the title is obviously misleading. However, I was intrigued by the scientific data presented. Too often scientific studies are simply not allowed or go unpublished because of political correctness. I don't want to see PC Dogma stifle advancements in Science anymore than Religious beliefs.
I am not impressed. Soy was first hailed as a miracle cure, then made out to be the cause of everyone's woes. Now the studies that "show" soy to be evil are being backed off from. I think anyone that feeds an infant nothing but soy formula is a moron, but I doubt most seriously it makes anyone gay. Doesn't mother's milk have estrogen? How do boy babies survive 9 months the *gasp* womb of an estrogen factory?What's the scientific evidence?That's addressed in the various articles from the OP and in the references.
I realize there are several scientific articles referenced and most people don't have a knack for this kind of thing, but they really aren't that difficult to follow. There are several references in the various articles presented by the author. Check these out:
The trouble with soy, part 3
I can tell you really appreciate subtle topics, del and dillo.
Quite seriously, if when they are published they are prefaced with a lie, why would anyone bother to believe them?That's not at all what it says. Here's basically what it says:
Yeah, that's why the title of the WND article is "Soy makes you gay".
Everyone knows WND is biased. That's not the question. And the title is obviously misleading. However, I was intrigued by the scientific data presented. Too often scientific studies are simply not allowed or go unpublished because of political correctness. I don't want to see PC Dogma stifle advancements in Science anymore than Religious beliefs.