dilloduck
Diamond Member
This is called a smear campaign.
ok--I thought I was two people there for a second
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is called a smear campaign.
And has it raised the incidence of homosexuality? World NUT Daily thinks it will.
This is called a smear campaign.
You probably missed my post:
I'm going through the scientific references in the various articles... Maybe I'll have an opinion in a day or so. What did you find that makes the research invalid?
Any comments?
I'd say it's unlikely. I read the whole article, and while i thought he made a couple leaps there was what seemed to me like pretty sound logic. I didn't see reference to religion so I'm guessing the 'religious wingnuts loves this stuff' comment was just more of the OPs unbiased, non-agenda-based love for religious people. Dunno.
You probably missed my post:
Any comments?
I'd say it's unlikely. I read the whole article, and while i thought he made a couple leaps there was what seemed to me like pretty sound logic. I didn't see reference to religion so I'm guessing the 'religious wingnuts loves this stuff' comment was just more of the OPs unbiased, non-agenda-based love for religious people. Dunno.
WND has a history of feeding those wingnuts what they want to hear even if it means twisting the truth or completely fabricating stories. Do you condone lying?
Years ago I saw a documentary that said that the amount of progesterone in a girl affected her behavior, why wouldn't you think the amount of estrogen in a boy would affect his behavior?
I'd say it's unlikely. I read the whole article, and while i thought he made a couple leaps there was what seemed to me like pretty sound logic. I didn't see reference to religion so I'm guessing the 'religious wingnuts loves this stuff' comment was just more of the OPs unbiased, non-agenda-based love for religious people. Dunno.
WND has a history of feeding those wingnuts what they want to hear even if it means twisting the truth or completely fabricating stories. Do you condone lying?
So are you trying to say that you don't intend to answer the question?
If you don't remember what it was I'll help you out:
What did you find that makes the research invalid?
Let's talk about the research. Not whether or not you like WND or how religious people really eat this stuff up or what the weather is like today. If you only posted this to laugh about how incredibly silly it is that's fine, so say, and we can all move on.
WND has a history of feeding those wingnuts what they want to hear even if it means twisting the truth or completely fabricating stories. Do you condone lying?
So are you trying to say that you don't intend to answer the question?
I didn't even realize you posted a question
If you don't remember what it was I'll help you out:
What did you find that makes the research invalid?
Let's talk about the research. Not whether or not you like WND or how religious people really eat this stuff up or what the weather is like today. If you only posted this to laugh about how incredibly silly it is that's fine, so say, and we can all move on.
Yeah, that's it. I can't believe anyone could even entertain such a juvenile conclusion.
If I posted a claim that feeding kumquats to dogs would make them speak French, would you even bother to look at any alleged research I presented?
So are you trying to say that you don't intend to answer the question?
I didn't even realize you posted a question
If you don't remember what it was I'll help you out:
What did you find that makes the research invalid?
Let's talk about the research. Not whether or not you like WND or how religious people really eat this stuff up or what the weather is like today. If you only posted this to laugh about how incredibly silly it is that's fine, so say, and we can all move on.
Yeah, that's it. I can't believe anyone could even entertain such a juvenile conclusion.
If I posted a claim that feeding kumquats to dogs would make them speak French, would you even bother to look at any alleged research I presented?
Ah, so if the conclusion sounds ridiculous, it MUST be wrong.
I didn't even realize you posted a question
Yeah, that's it. I can't believe anyone could even entertain such a juvenile conclusion.
If I posted a claim that feeding kumquats to dogs would make them speak French, would you even bother to look at any alleged research I presented?
Ah, so if the conclusion sounds ridiculous, it MUST be wrong.
Did I say that? Nope.
Ah, so if the conclusion sounds ridiculous, it MUST be wrong.
Did I say that? Nope.
You said you wouldn't entertain such a 'juvenile conclusion'. So what is it? Do you always reject a study that has a 'juvenile conclusion' or are you a troll? The world is waiting.
Ah, so if the conclusion sounds ridiculous, it MUST be wrong.
Did I say that? Nope.
You said you wouldn't entertain such a 'juvenile conclusion'. So what is it? Do you always reject a study that has a 'juvenile conclusion' or are you a troll? The world is waiting.
It doesn't make sense, otherwise most Asians would be gay.