CDZ Who will stand with me?

[candycorn]

This Philips person is one ugly, hateful human being and his ethnicity shouldn't provide him license to lie through his teeth in pursuit of his racist agenda.

It is only racist haters that call it a smirk. If he was a black kid instead of white kid, the same racists wouldnt call it a smirk at all when a kid is confronted by a criminal.

The full video shows the kids handling all the racist abuse and homophobic insults thrown at them with remarkable aplomb considering they were children being attacked by adults.

What motivates you to do that? Why do you consider smiling as the bad behavior rather than the weaponization of one's ethnicity to bully minors and to lie completely about what occurred?

You ever notice how when people on the right have no leg to stand on, the race card comes out?

The kid acted like an ass.
He shouldn’t have.
Kids do things they shouldn’t do.

Will we ever be able to move on with our lives after this? *clutching pearls*

You keep on lying that the kid a
Wad an ass when all he did was smile and the criminal wasn't despite intimidating one girl, beating his stupid drum right in the kids face and lying through his teeth to try to hurt them

Why do you continuing to lie over and over and over again?

He was.
Sorry if the facts upset you.
Why not make more unfounded accusations?
We know its all you have left.

Why do you continue to lie?are you under the false impression that calling your lies facts makes them facts?

The kid acted like an ass.
He shouldn’t have.
Kids do things they shouldn’t do.

Will we ever be able to move on with our lives after this? *clutching pearls*

 

[MarathonMike]

Making mountains out of molehills again. Jeez Looeez with all of the life and death situations in the world and this is the nonsense we dwell on.

 

[boedicca]

The kid acted like an ass.

Kids do that.

Not sure why there are 70 threads on this topic.

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

 

[candycorn]

The kid acted like an ass.

Kids do that.

Not sure why there are 70 threads on this topic.

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

What do you think would happen if one of the supporters of the liar with a criminal history were wearing their hope and change tee shirt and a member of proud boys were to approach them aggressively and start beating some fucking drum inches from their nose?

This is what reveals them as liars. OF COURSE they wouldn't support the proud boy antics and claim they were the ones indulging in the bad behavior. If it happened to them, they would be frightened it it would be all they could do to remain as calm as the boy when approached by the bully with a criminal history that included assault.

 

[boedicca]

The kid acted like an ass.

Kids do that.

Not sure why there are 70 threads on this topic.

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

That's because you approve of using Children as political targets.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The kid acted like an ass.

Kids do that.

Not sure why there are 70 threads on this topic.

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

That's because you approve of using Children as political targets.

All that matters is the dishonest agenda.

Children be damned.

 

[boedicca]

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

That's because you approve of using Children as political targets.

All that matters is the dishonest agenda.

Children be damned.

Correction: everyone who doesn't support the Prog-Totalitarian Agenda be damned.

 

[candycorn]

The kid acted like an ass.

Kids do that.

Not sure why there are 70 threads on this topic.

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

That's because you approve of using Children as political targets.

The only political statement being made was a red hat. Looks to me like the parents of hat boy are responsible for making their kid/letting their kid make political statements.

But those are the facts; don’t let them get in the way of your fable.

 

[boedicca]

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

Riddle me this: how would you feel if someone in a MAGA hat got in your face with a trumpet and blew it within a few inches of your ear over and over again after you had been called a Ho, Tramp, Slut, whatever by another group for over an hour? Not all assaults are purely physical.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

I said there was intimidation and provocation

Learn to read.

 

[candycorn]

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

Riddle me this: how would you feel if someone in a MAGA hat got in your face with a trumpet and blew it within a few inches of your ear over and over again after you had been called a Ho, Tramp, Slut, whatever by another group for over an hour? Not all assaults are purely physical.

So there wasn’t an attack or there was an attack? Perhaps I’ll buy you a mirror so you can debate yourself.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

And the drum-beating, chanting "elder"? What did he act like? Who was more admirable in their actions, the child or the 64-yr-old "elder"?

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

That's because you approve of using Children as political targets.

The only political statement being made was a red hat. Looks to me like the parents of hat boy are responsible for making their kid/letting their kid make political statements.

But those are the facts; don’t let them get in the way of your fable.

So, in other words, you do not believe in free speech and support measures taken to prevent it through acts of intimidation.

That's what fascists do.

 

[candycorn]

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

I said there was intimidation and provocation

Learn to read.

This is what you wrote:

"The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?”

Seems like you’re the one who can’t read.

 

[boedicca]

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

Riddle me this: how would you feel if someone in a MAGA hat got in your face with a trumpet and blew it within a few inches of your ear over and over again after you had been called a Ho, Tramp, Slut, whatever by another group for over an hour? Not all assaults are purely physical.

So there wasn’t an attack or there was an attack? Perhaps I’ll buy you a mirror so you can debate yourself.

Ah, so you don't believe there are things such as verbal attacks and emotional abuse.

Got it. The victims of such attacks would disagree with your POV.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The elder.

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

Riddle me this: how would you feel if someone in a MAGA hat got in your face with a trumpet and blew it within a few inches of your ear over and over again after you had been called a Ho, Tramp, Slut, whatever by another group for over an hour? Not all assaults are purely physical.

We are obviously talking to an individual incapable of reason and unwilling to put them self in somebody else's shoes. All that matters is their hatred that is the result of a conditioned response.

 

[Natural Citizen]

There are two things a serviceman should never do.

1 - politicize his military service

2 - lie about his military service

The 'elder' has openly participated in both.

As far as the incident itself, I don't care about it. I'd rather be engaged in adult discussion, particularly talking about the 22 trillion dollars worth of debt we're kicking down the road and how we're going to solve that.

 

[boedicca]

The Elder who lied about being a Vietnam Vet and then attacked a CHILD?

Your moral compass is seriously out of whack.

There was no attack.

There was intimidation and provocation

Why do you keep lying? What is your motivation?

You said there was an attack.
Now you say there wasn’t.
Why do you keep lying?
Is your red hat on too tight sonny?

Riddle me this: how would you feel if someone in a MAGA hat got in your face with a trumpet and blew it within a few inches of your ear over and over again after you had been called a Ho, Tramp, Slut, whatever by another group for over an hour? Not all assaults are purely physical.

We are obviously talking to an individual incapable of reason and unwilling to put them self in somebody else's shoes. All that matters is their hatred that is the result of a conditioned response.

Indeed. S.G. Cheah has an excellent piece in Medium this week on how it is impossible to have a civil, rational discussion with people who FEEL instead of think critically. candycorn is in the FEELz cateogry.

Civility on the Decline — A Crisis in Free Speech and Violence

 

[pismoe]

This Philips person is one ugly, hateful human being and his ethnicity shouldn't provide him license to lie through his teeth in pursuit of his racist agenda.

It is only racist haters that call it a smirk. If he was a black kid instead of white kid, the same racists wouldnt call it a smirk at all when a kid is confronted by a criminal.

The full video shows the kids handling all the racist abuse and homophobic insults thrown at them with remarkable aplomb considering they were children being attacked by adults.

What motivates you to do that? Why do you consider smiling as the bad behavior rather than the weaponization of one's ethnicity to bully minors and to lie completely about what occurred?

You ever notice how when people on the right have no leg to stand on, the race card comes out?

The kid acted like an ass.
He shouldn’t have.
Kids do things they shouldn’t do.

Will we ever be able to move on with our lives after this? *clutching pearls*

You keep on lying that the kid a
Wad an ass when all he did was smile and the criminal wasn't despite intimidating one girl, beating his stupid drum right in the kids face and lying through his teeth to try to hurt them

Why do you continuing to lie over and over and over again?

He was.
Sorry if the facts upset you.
Why not make more unfounded accusations?
We know its all you have left.

Why do you continue to lie?are you under the false impression that calling your lies facts makes them facts?

------------------------------------------------- pretty interesting how she does her lying right out in front for everyone to see eh Dogma ??

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This Philips person is one ugly, hateful human being and his ethnicity shouldn't provide him license to lie through his teeth in pursuit of his racist agenda.

It is only racist haters that call it a smirk. If he was a black kid instead of white kid, the same racists wouldnt call it a smirk at all when a kid is confronted by a criminal.

The full video shows the kids handling all the racist abuse and homophobic insults thrown at them with remarkable aplomb considering they were children being attacked by adults.

What motivates you to do that? Why do you consider smiling as the bad behavior rather than the weaponization of one's ethnicity to bully minors and to lie completely about what occurred?

You ever notice how when people on the right have no leg to stand on, the race card comes out?

The kid acted like an ass.
He shouldn’t have.
Kids do things they shouldn’t do.

Will we ever be able to move on with our lives after this? *clutching pearls*

You keep on lying that the kid a
Wad an ass when all he did was smile and the criminal wasn't despite intimidating one girl, beating his stupid drum right in the kids face and lying through his teeth to try to hurt them

Why do you continuing to lie over and over and over again?

He was.
Sorry if the facts upset you.
Why not make more unfounded accusations?
We know its all you have left.

Why do you continue to lie?are you under the false impression that calling your lies facts makes them facts?

------------------------------------------------- pretty interesting how she does her lying right out in front for everyone to see eh Dogma ??

You know, I can understand people gettIng a little worked up over the first, carefully edited propaganda video, and any decent person who did so, but then saw the unedited version has admitted they were duped and apologized for their behavior if out of line.

All a person really has to say in that case is " oh, now that I have seen the whole thing in context, I can see what really happened. "It takes a very special combination of hatred and dishonesty to STILL cling to the original dogma in light of the truth.