- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,887
- 4,804
- 265
Wrong you fool.No, you're stupid. They have evidence. You just don't think it proves anything.You seem to think *evidence* means *proof*.No he did not whatsoever it is you lacking in comprehension.
Please. You are embarassing yourself by advertising your stupidity.
"Evidence is anything that you see, experience, read, or are told that causes you to believe that something is true or has really happened."
"Evidence is the information that is used in a court of law to try to prove something. Evidence is obtained from documents, objects, or witnesses."
Evidence = information used to prove something.
That doesn't mean it necessarily does prove something. People present evidence all the time, and the evidence doesn't prove what they say it proves (morons like you pull that crap all the time). But just because it doesn't prove something doesn't mean it suddenly isn't evidence.
Is this too complicated for you?
Evidence is any set of facts or information that convinces one set of the truth of a matter. That isn't to say everybody agrees with them as to the truth of the matter...but evidence is still evidence.
Getting through? Hello?
Evidence definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
I understand it perfectly and always have.
What you are too stupid to grasp is I am correct and those conspiracy morons have no evidence.
Again. .evidence is ANY SET OF FACTS or INFORMATION that convinces ONE SET of the truth of a matter.
Your wrongheaded and stupid interpretation would maintain that evidence is only evidence if everybody agrees on what it means.
In which case the courts wouldn't call it evidence.
Dumbass.
Evidence in THIS forum is something used to defend or prove your contention to others.
He made assertions he insisted were true but he did not provide one shred of evidence to back them up. The very fact that he was talking to others proves he needed to provide evidence to others NOT to himself as he already believes his tripe.'
And BTW that is all perfectly consistent with the definitions you posted .
SO this is evidence that you are the fool who is almost as stupid as he is and you are welcome for the correction.
Soupy, please accept this constructive criticism in the spirit in which it is intended....but you have a need to incorporate even grade school punctuation skills into your postings. It will only serve you better as you reply on this site. Reading your fool-fueled rants is pathetic enough as it is...... but when you can't even put in a strategic pause with a "comma"? HOLY shit.........you come across as some kind of illiterate moron and it hurts any point that you wish to make. We all make the occasional typos when we are in hurry to reply...and we occasionally forget the rules of punctuation. You abuse it to the tenth degree.
Go back, read your musings and look at it from the point of view of those that you are replying to......you have no clue on where a "comma" should be placed..... but yet you wish to be taken seriously and have your opinions weighed and considered? It's not gonna happen, my friend, unless you start using basic punctuation skills. "Commas" are a HUGE part of writing. Those that are my biggest detractors use basic writing skills when attempting to refute my arguments. I respect their writing abilities even if we have a difference of opinion. This forum has some very good writers regardless of which side one is on...and you are not one of them. This reply isn't intended to hurt your pride, but rather to help you.
Like we say in Texas? "Good on ya"........
Read this criticism and live with it because it is true.
My punctuation is fine.
More importantly I have been stating facts.
You have never presented evidence of any kind and your idiotic posts are, IDIOTIC.
Get some evidence and then come back because you are coming across as nothing but a dishonest retard.