CNN analyst: "I've never seen a witness who's lied to Congress, who's lied to court, who's lied to the IRS, who's lied to the Southern District ...

[Cellblock2429]

Oh, please, all the "lynchers" joined the GOP after Nixon's Southern strategy

/—-/ That has been debunked a dozen times. I grew up in the segregated south. The old guard segregationist died off and my generation joined the Republican Party.

 

[Kilroy2]

DOJ, and all the others offices are run by a head person or director. They control the day to day operations. Hiring and firing making a budget, employee management. and whatever they are task with doing.

The heads of these department answer to the president as he appoints the head of a department.

The president has its own office. (Office of the Presidency.) run directly by him thru an assistant.

Who does the president answer to? The people who vote for or against him. Yeah congress has that impeachment thing but we seen how well that has worked out.

he was impeached but still able to keep his office.

 

[JoeB131]

/—-/ That has been debunked a dozen times. I grew up in the segregated south. The old guard segregationist died off and my generation joined the Republican Party.

the only difference between that generation and your generation is that you don't say the N-word in mixed company.

(I'm sure you say it at home. A lot )

 

[DBA]

Trump faked business records to hide a payoff to a porn star to influence an election.

No, he has shown the proclivty to take action in cases involving negative publicity before his candidicy. It is up to the prosecution that he did so this time because of his campaign and not for the same reasons he has done so in the past. That has most certainly NOT been proven.

Because the payoff happened right after the Access Hollywood tape came out, and he boasted about how he can grab women by the pussy.

No, the payoff happened right after Stormy asked for more money, which was just after the Access Hollywood tape came out. She felt that was a good of a time as ever to get what she wanted. As I said before, had the Access Hollywood tape come out and he was not a candidate for President, history shows he would have taken action to keep her quiet.

The prosecution's case is extremely flawed. Their only hope is a biased jury and a judge that gives the jury some biased instructions. Both of these are very possible with the corruption among Democrats in NYC.

 

[DBA]

the only difference between that generation and your generation is that you don't say the N-word in mixed company.

(I'm sure you say it at home. A lot )

Funny how you are an expert on Southerners despite living in Chicago. It seems as though Democrat fancy themselves as experts on everything.

 

[BackAgain]

Teabaggers keep claiming that, but STILL can't PROVE it.

Because Trump stopped the investigation by firing the prosecutor.

AG Barr says Trump has fired SDNY federal prosecutor ...​

View attachment 949848
Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › william-barr-trum...
Jun 20, 2020 — Attorney General William Barr informed the District Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Saturday that President Trump has ...

The firing of SDNY US Attorney Geoffrey Berman, explained​

View attachment 949849
Vox
https://www.vox.com › geoffrey-berman-sdny-fired-barr
Jun 22, 2020 — They investigated the hush money payments arranged by Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen to women who had alleged affairs with Trump.



THAT was your dear leader.

Trump judge sets March date for historic criminal trial in ...​

View attachment 949850
France 24
https://www.france24.com › France 24 › Americas
Feb 15, 2024 — A New York judge on Thursday rejected Donald Trump's attempts to dismiss charges he covered up hush money payments to a porn star, setting the ...

Unless you falsifying business records to cover up another crime, like Trump, then it's a felony.

Who did Cohen perjure for?

WTF?
Trump's image as a liar is well documented.

NO, it isn't.

A lot of words in that ^ false post. No truth. But a lot of words.

Off topic for the most part, too.

 

[DBA]

Because the payoff happened right after the Access Hollywood tape came out, and he boasted about how he can grab women by the pussy.

And? The payment coincided with Stormy asking for money. She couldn't sell her story to news outlets for much before Trump's presidency nor before the Access Hollywood tape. They weren't interested. Had they been interested, she could have likely blackmailed him again as she tried to do many years before Trump ran for office. Don't you remember her saying that Trump's acting like a mob boss to keep her quiet? Mob boss accusation aside, why was he so motivated to keep her quiet so many years prior to his candidacy? Could it be for the exact same reasons she was paid off during his candidacy? It only stands to reason that his motivations could have been exactly the same.

You are lost.

 

[Cellblock2429]

the only difference between that generation and your generation is that you don't say the N-word in mixed company.

(I'm sure you say it at home. A lot )

/——/ I’m sure you are so devoid of any legitimate argument that you’re reduced to childish insults. And you proved me right.

 

[JoeB131]

No, he has shown the proclivty to take action in cases involving negative publicity before his candidicy. It is up to the prosecution that he did so this time because of his campaign and not for the same reasons he has done so in the past. That has most certainly NOT been proven.

Um, yeah, it has, and the fact he didn't take the stand and the one guy they did put on the stand exploded in the witness box.

No, the payoff happened right after Stormy asked for more money, which was just after the Access Hollywood tape came out. She felt that was a good of a time as ever to get what she wanted. As I said before, had the Access Hollywood tape come out and he was not a candidate for President, history shows he would have taken action to keep her quiet.

Except he didn't pay her off five years ago, he paid her off after the Access Hollywood, and his candidacy was on the knife's edge.

And? The payment coincided with Stormy asking for money. She couldn't sell her story to news outlets for much before Trump's presidency nor before the Access Hollywood tape. They weren't interested. Had they been interested, she could have likely blackmailed him again as she tried to do many years before Trump ran for office. Don't you remember her saying that Trump's acting like a mob boss to keep her quiet? Mob boss accusation aside, why was he so motivated to keep her quiet so many years prior to his candidacy? Could it be for the exact same reasons she was paid off during his candidacy? It only stands to reason that his motivations could have been exactly the same.

Nope. Point is, he didn't pay her off until he was running for president.

 

[DBA]

Um, yeah, it has, and the fact he didn't take the stand and the one guy they did put on the stand exploded in the witness box.



Except he didn't pay her off five years ago, he paid her off after the Access Hollywood, and his candidacy was on the knife's edge.



Nope. Point is, he didn't pay her off until he was running for president.

She didn’t ask for money from him prior to his candidacy. She did say that Trump attempted to strong arm the tabloid that she interviewed with not to publish the story way back when. In other words, he cared about the negative publicity BEFORE his candidacy. Did Trump do similar things with stop other negative stories prior to this candidacy? Yes, case closed.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Um, yeah, it has, and the fact he didn't take the stand and the one guy they did put on the stand exploded in the witness box.



Except he didn't pay her off five years ago, he paid her off after the Access Hollywood, and his candidacy was on the knife's edge.



Nope. Point is, he didn't pay her off until he was running for president.

The judge exploded not the witness. For some reason he was hypersensitive to reactions to his sustaining every objection from the prosecution! Why even bring witnesses when the judge won't allow them to testify? Merchan has been so blatantly biased in this trial it's approaching farce. He wouldn't allow Costello to testify. He wouldn't allow the other witness the defense wanted to testify to even speak about campaign finance law.

 

[JoeB131]

She didn’t ask for money from him prior to his candidacy. She did say that Trump attempted to strong arm the tabloid that she interviewed with not to publish the story way back when. In other words, he cared about the negative publicity BEFORE his candidacy. Did Trump do similar things with stop other negative stories prior to this candidacy? Yes, case closed.

Not really. The fact he took such extreme measure AFTER his candidacy and was in full-blown panic after the Access Hollywood tape came out, makes the case that this was done for political and not personal reasons.

There is zero question that he falsified business records and fucked Stormy Daniels (although he's still denying he did either!) The argument you are making is that since he has always been kind of a sleaze, this makes this bit of sleaziness okay.

 

[JoeB131]

The judge exploded not the witness. For some reason he was hypersensitive to reactions to his sustaining every objection from the prosecution! Why even bring witnesses when the judge won't allow them to testify? Merchan has been so blatantly biased in this trial it's approaching farce. He wouldn't allow Costello to testify. He wouldn't allow the other witness the defense wanted to testify to even speak about campaign finance law.

Is that the story you are going with?

Costello is a lawyer, he should know how to act in court. You don't mutter, "Geez", you don't give the judge dirty looks. And the fact that there are emails showing that he was acting on behalf of Trump while trying to worm his way into representing Cohen has blown up in the faces of the defense.

 

[DBA]

Not really. The fact he took such extreme measure AFTER his candidacy and was in full-blown panic after the Access Hollywood tape came out, makes the case that this was done for political and not personal reasons.

There is zero question that he falsified business records and fucked Stormy Daniels (although he's still denying he did either!) The argument you are making is that since he has always been kind of a sleaze, this makes this bit of sleaziness okay.

No, the fact that he took similar actions prior to his candidacy proves that he had other motivations other than his candidacy. It is up to your partisan wackos to prove that he did it for his candidacy and not for personal reasons as he had done in the past. How exactly have they done that? How did they rule out that he did this for personal reasons?

This case is an absolute joke. The ONLY chance is a biased jury. We alreayd know there is a biased judge. There is absolutely ZERO chance of conviction in this case without partisanship and/or foul play.

 

[JoeB131]

No, the fact that he took similar actions prior to his candidacy proves that he had other motivations other than his candidacy. It is up to your partisan wackos to prove that he did it for his candidacy and not for personal reasons as he had done in the past. How exactly have they done that? How did they rule out that he did this for personal reasons?

This case is an absolute joke. The ONLY chance is a biased jury. We alreayd know there is a biased judge. There is absolutely ZERO chance of conviction in this case without partisanship and/or foul play.

Squeal like a pig, boy!

Trump isn't on trial for documents he faked before his candidacy, just the ones he did afterwards. I would love to put this orange sack of shit on trial for every crime he's committed before he was a candidate!

He ran for President.
The Access Hollywood Tape came out.
He paid Stormy under the table
He faked documents to cover it up.

This isn't complicated.

 

[DBA]

Squeal like a pig, boy!

Trump isn't on trial for documents he faked before his candidacy, just the ones he did afterwards. I would love to put this orange sack of shit on trial for every crime he's committed before he was a candidate!

He ran for President.
The Access Hollywood Tape came out.
He paid Stormy under the table
He faked documents to cover it up.

This isn't complicated.

No, it isn’t complicated. You must prove that he paid Stormy for campaign reasons an NOT for personal ones. Good luck.

It is hilarious how just look of impropriety is good enough to convict when it comes to Trump but most certainly not when it comes to Biden or his son. Funny stuff, really.

 

[JoeB131]

No, it isn’t complicated. You must prove that he paid Stormy for campaign reasons an NOT for personal ones. Good luck.

Well, here's the thing.

Trump needed to testify and tell the Jury that to their faces.

He didn't do that.

So you have the word of 20 witnesses who said, "Yup, he did this for the election" and Trump has ZERO witnesses saying otherwise.

His whole defense, one paralegal who had no knowledge, and Costello who immediately imploded on the stand.

 

[DBA]

Trump needed to testify and tell the Jury that to their faces

Not with this judge who would do nothing to stop the prosecution from asking a myriad of completely unrelated questions just to smear Trump. After all, that really is the only point of this entire frivolous case.

I know you fancy yourself an expert in, well, everything, but maybe you should listen to real lawyers. Here is just one who was actually sitting in the courtroom during the trial. Here is where you attack the source because he doesn’t agree with the left-wing narrative that has been pounded into your head.

I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, and what I saw shocked me

 

[JoeB131]

Not with this judge who would do nothing to stop the prosecution from asking a myriad of completely unrelated questions just to smear Trump. After all, that really is the only point of this entire frivolous case.

To point out what a sleaze Trump is? Um, we all knew Trump was a sleaze. Why you keep supporting him knowing he is a sleaze is beyond me.

I know you fancy yourself an expert in, well, everything, but maybe you should listen to real lawyers. Here is just one who was actually sitting in the courtroom during the trial. Here is where you attack the source because he doesn’t agree with the left-wing narrative that has been pounded into your head.

Isn't this the same Allen "Lolita Island" Dershawitz who defended Claus von Bulow, OJ Simpson and Jeffrey Epstein?

Here's how I know someone is guilty. Dershawitz is defending him.

 

[Wapasha]

Oh, please, all the "lynchers" joined the GOP after Nixon's Southern strategy

That's ridiculous. The Republicans and Democrats did not switch Parties in the mid to late 1960s because of Nixon’s Southern Strategy. Nixon lost the deep south in 1968. How can you claim his plan worked, when he freaking lost????

Al Gore's father was a segregationist, Bill Clinton's mentor was a segregationist, Sen. Joe Biden was a segregationist, Sen. Robert Byrd was a segregationist. Of all the Democrat Senators who filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act (CRA), only one senator, Strom Thurman, switched parties to Republican, all the rest remained lifelong Democrats until they died.

Sen. Robert Byrd was elected by the Democrats of the US Senate to be their US Senate leader from 1977 to 1989, and this was after the so called "southern strategy," and this was after he led the Democrat’s Senate filibuster against the 1964 CRA.

The Democrats honored Sen. Richard B. Russell Jr. by naming the Russell Senate Office building after him. And this too was after he and Sen. Byrd filibustered the 1964 CRA.

So please, stop trying to rewrite history with this ignorant crap about Democrats and Republicans magically switching parties. After hating Republicans for decades, even lynching white Republicans alongside blacks... You want us to believe that the dems all suddenly abandoned their beloved slave party and joined the enemy?????

The current Democratic Party are the cancel party, are still the racist lynch mob.