Some change... Sounds like Obama is Bush's third term....
Newsmax.com - Washington's 'Pay to Play:' Billions Wasted in Earmarks
Newsmax.com - Washington's 'Pay to Play:' Billions Wasted in Earmarks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Look on the bright side. It's part of the stimulus bill and not another bill they want to pass next week.
Why didn't Bush want to put the BIG 3 in the $750 billion bank bailout? Why didn't he make the bankers take $10 billion out and LOAN it to the Big 3?
Either
a. Bush wanted the banks to get all that money, because it is necessary.
b. Bush wanted the bank robbers to get all the money and not share.
So either you guys are calling Bush out as being a fraud/liar/thief, or what?
Please explain why I'm off track.
Look on the bright side. It's part of the stimulus bill and not another bill they want to pass next week.
Why didn't Bush want to put the BIG 3 in the $750 billion bank bailout? Why didn't he make the bankers take $10 billion out and LOAN it to the Big 3?
Either
a. Bush wanted the banks to get all that money, because it is necessary.
b. Bush wanted the bank robbers to get all the money and not share.
So either you guys are calling Bush out as being a fraud/liar/thief, or what?
Please explain why I'm off track.
lead paint
Look on the bright side. It's part of the stimulus bill and not another bill they want to pass next week.
Why didn't Bush want to put the BIG 3 in the $750 billion bank bailout? Why didn't he make the bankers take $10 billion out and LOAN it to the Big 3?
Either
a. Bush wanted the banks to get all that money, because it is necessary.
b. Bush wanted the bank robbers to get all the money and not share.
So either you guys are calling Bush out as being a fraud/liar/thief, or what?
Please explain why I'm off track.
lead paint
You guys just won't answer any direct questions because you'll be exposed as being full of shit.
Same reason why Rush doesn't debate or ever invite a progressive with balls on his show. He'd get exposed.
I hope the Fairness Doctrine forces Rush to have a co-host, and of course we will socialize the media and the government gets to pick his co host.
Not the corporate media, not rush, not Steele, not the oil companies, not dick chaney, not abramoff, or foley or craig or vetter or libby or O'reilly or Slanity.
Look on the bright side. It's part of the stimulus bill and not another bill they want to pass next week.
Why didn't Bush want to put the BIG 3 in the $750 billion bank bailout? Why didn't he make the bankers take $10 billion out and LOAN it to the Big 3?
Either
a. Bush wanted the banks to get all that money, because it is necessary.
b. Bush wanted the bank robbers to get all the money and not share.
So either you guys are calling Bush out as being a fraud/liar/thief, or what?
Please explain why I'm off track.
Look on the bright side. It's part of the stimulus bill and not another bill they want to pass next week.
Why didn't Bush want to put the BIG 3 in the $750 billion bank bailout? Why didn't he make the bankers take $10 billion out and LOAN it to the Big 3?
Either
a. Bush wanted the banks to get all that money, because it is necessary.
b. Bush wanted the bank robbers to get all the money and not share.
So either you guys are calling Bush out as being a fraud/liar/thief, or what?
Please explain why I'm off track.
lead paint
You guys just won't answer any direct questions because you'll be exposed as being full of shit.
Same reason why Rush doesn't debate or ever invite a progressive with balls on his show. He'd get exposed.
I hope the Fairness Doctrine forces Rush to have a co-host, and of course we will socialize the media and the government gets to pick his co host.
Not the corporate media, not rush, not Steele, not the oil companies, not dick chaney, not abramoff, or foley or craig or vetter or libby or O'reilly or Slanity.