/—-/ That is talking about the elusive number of gig work. Uber was just starting out (2009?) when Obozo seized the office. (I say seized to irritate the left who said that about the GOP winning the House in the 90s) I’m talking about people who lost their full time careers and were forced to take 2 part time gigs just to have $$ coming in. Obozo counted those as 2 new jobs created. It was all BS.Except now Krueger and Katz say they were wrong. Economists walk back study showing huge increase in gig work - CNN/—-/ Here ya go Spanky: Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-TimeFrom your link:/—-/ It frustrating when you libtards pretend to be uninformed. Stop playing stupid. The information is just a google search away: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.comAre you saying that under Trump that's not true? Can you point to the BLS announcement of this change in methodology?/——/ However they lost their jobs, Obozo counted the part time jobs as new jobs created.
And go do realize that the number of multiple job holders and the percent of part time workers went down under Obama?
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.
Anyone can say a new study from Harvard and Princeton but if you don’t actually post a link to the study, then how do you know it’s not complete bullshit?