Time for Moderates to grow a set of balls

Well, there you have it....The admission that there really wasn't a surplus in 1998, or at any other time during the Clintoon regime.

Thanks for that inadvertent moment of swerving into the facts.

Republicans can't have it both ways....

Either Clinton left a surplus
or George Bush lied about there being a surplus to justify his tax cut

So ...which is it?

Last surplus : Left by president Andrew Jackson 1837.

.

So then Bush must have lied when he sold a tax cut to give the supposed "surplus" back to the taxpayers
 
What got spent?

How did Bush justify a ten year tax cut based on a non-existent surplus?

It's amusing how you leftists suddenly hold Bush up as the standard to meet.

Bush spent 8 years spending like a drunken monkey. There is no justification for his spending. Dear Leader spends at twice the rate even Bush did.

Try to keep up

We are not talking spending....we are talking tax cuts justified on a budget surplus

Tell us republicans....was there a surplus or not?
 
Republicans can't have it both ways....

Either Clinton left a surplus
or George Bush lied about there being a surplus to justify his tax cut

So ...which is it?

Last surplus : Left by president Andrew Jackson 1837.

.

So then Bush must have lied when he sold a tax cut to give the supposed "surplus" back to the taxpayers
So, that must have been the one moment that he told the truth, over the remaining eight years of lies, huh?

How conveeeeeenient. :rolleyes:
 
You're doing the same thing, Oddball. You're accusing Rightwinger of cherry picking when Bush is correct...but you're doing the same thing. Either he was or he wasn't truthful on that particular issue.

Which was it?
 
Republicans can't have it both ways....

Either Clinton left a surplus
or George Bush lied about there being a surplus to justify his tax cut

So ...which is it?

Last surplus : Left by president Andrew Jackson 1837.

.

So then Bush must have lied when he sold a tax cut to give the supposed "surplus" back to the taxpayers

Presidents do not have to wait for a surplus to let us keep our money.

Get that through your thick skull - taxpayers work for the money and that money rightfully belongs to them.

Now, I agree that scumbag Bush should have not engaged the nations in two wars thereby increasing expenditures while simultaneously reducing revenue. But since 1971 Libertarians have been telling you that BOTH parties suck the big wiener. But you guys refuse to believe.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top