tied for hottest June in record history---Nasa.

Karl Et Al and garbage upward adjustments... UAH and RSS say they are full of BS..

08-comparison-2001-start.png


The divergence from reality is stunning. The manipulated and controlled data sets from those folks are BS. US-CRN and the Satellites say B.S.
 
It's profoundly stupid to declare that satellite measurements of mid-tropospheric temperatures from around 14,000 feet are better measurements of the surface temperature than the surface temperature measurements.

Therefore, it's what Billy claims. RSS is not taken seriously by anyone. Except the very, very desperate deniers. The contortions they go into to deny the data are getting comical.
 
"Naturally fueled" is Bob's code word for "magic". Bob is one of the utter nutters. He thinks that the physics of the greenhouse effect is a hypothesis and he thinks it doesn't hold up. These days he's in the minority of deniers.

Most fake sceptics these days accept that there are such things as greenhouse gases and that the world is warming. They'll argue various things like how much the world is warming and what the future climates will be like, but they realise they'd look pretty stupid if they denied any warming at all. Bob Tisdale looks pretty stupid.


Here is a chart showing the ocean heat content down only as far as 700 metres, including the Indian Ocean that Bob Tisdale doesn't want his readers to know about:


Data Source:NOAA/NODC
The heat accumulating in the different oceans is added together to get the total heat accumulating in all the oceans. The chart above shows just how much the system is heating up.

The chart below shows the top two kilometres of ocean. It's accumulating more and more heat. The heat from the top 700 metres is heating the layers below. Bob doesn't want his readers to know that.

HotWhopper Bob Tisdale rejects the greenhouse effect again
 
And? The point is? Hasn't the temperatures been changing since the beginning of time? Is this the first time since the beginning of time that Earth's temperatures have changed? Have you ever heard of the Ice Age? Have you ever heard about the surface being boiling hot at the very beginning of Earth's existence? Why wouldn't temperatures change, if they've been changing since the beginning of time?
 
(coughing) bullshit datasets, simply stated by me JC. Again, no proof from datasets temperature readings. Instead manufactured.
 
And? The point is? Hasn't the temperatures been changing since the beginning of time? Is this the first time since the beginning of time that Earth's temperatures have changed? Have you ever heard of the Ice Age? Have you ever heard about the surface being boiling hot at the very beginning of Earth's existence? Why wouldn't temperatures change, if they've been changing since the beginning of time?


The point is that we humans by added co2, methane, etc are adding positive forcing to the climate system. Some of the greatest extinctions in history have been caused by co2 or methane; Permian for one.

Temperatures been changing since the beginning of time! YES! Doesn't have anything to do with this discussion of course.

First time? No.

Heard of ice age? Yes!!! Of course, that was caused by natural negative forcing that isn't happening now.

What does the beginning boil surface have to do with now?

Dude, we're adding a positive forcing through our use of green house gases into the climate system. How hard is that to understand?
 
And? The point is? Hasn't the temperatures been changing since the beginning of time? Is this the first time since the beginning of time that Earth's temperatures have changed? Have you ever heard of the Ice Age? Have you ever heard about the surface being boiling hot at the very beginning of Earth's existence? Why wouldn't temperatures change, if they've been changing since the beginning of time?


The point is that we humans by added co2, methane, etc are adding positive forcing to the climate system. Some of the greatest extinctions in history have been caused by co2 or methane; Permian for one.

Temperatures been changing since the beginning of time! YES! Doesn't have anything to do with this discussion of course.

First time? No.

Heard of ice age? Yes!!! Of course, that was caused by natural negative forcing that isn't happening now.

What does the beginning boil surface have to do with now?

Dude, we're adding a positive forcing through our use of green house gases into the climate system. How hard is that to understand?

Yes it accounts for less than 1% world wide, yet so many people want to spend 47 Trillion dollars to fight the less than 1% for their religious cause.

And as you can see the extinction scare is back in the AGW speak..

But then again in 500 million years the Sun will start to become so hot and bright that life will start to die off on this planet. By 1.2 Billion years life will not be able to exist on this planet.

I bet these cult member will still blame it on AGW..
 
"Naturally fueled" is Bob's code word for "magic". Bob is one of the utter nutters. He thinks that the physics of the greenhouse effect is a hypothesis and he thinks it doesn't hold up. These days he's in the minority of deniers.

Most fake sceptics these days accept that there are such things as greenhouse gases and that the world is warming. They'll argue various things like how much the world is warming and what the future climates will be like, but they realise they'd look pretty stupid if they denied any warming at all. Bob Tisdale looks pretty stupid.


Here is a chart showing the ocean heat content down only as far as 700 metres, including the Indian Ocean that Bob Tisdale doesn't want his readers to know about:


Data Source:NOAA/NODC
The heat accumulating in the different oceans is added together to get the total heat accumulating in all the oceans. The chart above shows just how much the system is heating up.

The chart below shows the top two kilometres of ocean. It's accumulating more and more heat. The heat from the top 700 metres is heating the layers below. Bob doesn't want his readers to know that.

HotWhopper Bob Tisdale rejects the greenhouse effect again

Hotwhopper.... lollololololol what a pant load ..
 
I'm convinced that global warming nutters cannot comprehend the meaning of the term "trace gas". They're just too fucking stupid.
 
I'm convinced that global warming nutters cannot comprehend the meaning of the term "trace gas". They're just too fucking stupid.

And you can't comprehend the ability of that trace gas to block the ir radiation from being lost to space! Physics tells us that greenhouse gases hold in heat that would otherwise go back into space.

Take a science class before you call others stupid.
 
I'm convinced that global warming nutters cannot comprehend the meaning of the term "trace gas". They're just too fucking stupid.

And you can't comprehend the ability of that trace gas to block the ir radiation from being lost to space! Physics tells us that greenhouse gases hold in heat that would otherwise go back into space.

Take a science class before you call others stupid.
Bullshit. You're an idiot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top