jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,368
- 1,130
They just had a blizzard in Australia
it is winter in Australia --LOL
out here in Rapid City
they had to get the snow plows out last weekend
for several inches of hail/sleet
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They just had a blizzard in Australia
Tell us your qualification EinsteinOf course, you'll do that because you're ignorant regarding the subject. You don't know any better, so you don't have much choice.
Hey Einstein quote some of your scientists [LOL]...what do the witch doctors say about global warming Babalu aye... the established science says one thing and bitter clingers say another LOLThe left wing zealots are laughable. They will not look at the science and when they are called on it they refuse to produce credible science of any kind..
The adjustments to the records are arbitrary and without basis in facts or reason... They are done because the data did not match their fantasy models. So rather than admit their theroy wrong they have manufactured data..
Politically driven BULL SHIT!
Pluto? What does Pluto have to do with the topic of this thread?Tell us your qualification EinsteinOf course, you'll do that because you're ignorant regarding the subject. You don't know any better, so you don't have much choice.
what method you use ...reading sheep entrails...you all are anti science mumbo jumboistas ...Science just accomplished the Pluto fly by...you all just fly by facys logic and science...One of you nut bags said all of the scientist who say there is global warming are corrupoted by money and the only real ones are tied to the fossil fuel industry...yes yes you all that stupid...
and again, for the umpteenth hundred time, you have no proof that man made CO2 causes forcing. You simply don't have it. I have Herr Koch experiment in 1901 that proves my position. So, why not find something that actually backs your claim. It's all we who are skeptics have asked for repeatedly in this forum. It takes a small man to ignore the basic concerns by skeptics, and that is there is no evidence.And? The point is? Hasn't the temperatures been changing since the beginning of time? Is this the first time since the beginning of time that Earth's temperatures have changed? Have you ever heard of the Ice Age? Have you ever heard about the surface being boiling hot at the very beginning of Earth's existence? Why wouldn't temperatures change, if they've been changing since the beginning of time?.76c for June...Tied the hottest June ever.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
Data.GISS GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
The point is that we humans by added co2, methane, etc are adding positive forcing to the climate system. Some of the greatest extinctions in history have been caused by co2 or methane; Permian for one.
Temperatures been changing since the beginning of time! YES! Doesn't have anything to do with this discussion of course.
First time? No.
Heard of ice age? Yes!!! Of course, that was caused by natural negative forcing that isn't happening now.
What does the beginning boil surface have to do with now?
Dude, we're adding a positive forcing through our use of green house gases into the climate system. How hard is that to understand?
and you can't prove it does what you just wrote. Can you?I'm convinced that global warming nutters cannot comprehend the meaning of the term "trace gas". They're just too fucking stupid.
And you can't comprehend the ability of that trace gas to block the ir radiation from being lost to space! Physics tells us that greenhouse gases hold in heat that would otherwise go back into space.
Take a science class before you call others stupid.
perhaps you could actually show some science instead of continuing to write the word in a forum. We can all write the word science, problem is you have no physical science. hahahahahahhaahahaIdiots say a lot of things.
you just proved it ....you all do not believe in science .....the science is against you so you attack science...facts are pesky things...you all are fringe elements
Pluto? What does Pluto have to do with the topic of this thread?
The Climate experts disagree with you...you are a nobody...you know no science ...go read sheep entrails...go quote "Lord Mockton" ..LOLperhaps you could actually show some science instead of continuing to write the word in a forum. We can all write the word science, problem is you have no physical science. hahahahahahhaahahaIdiots say a lot of things.
you just proved it ....you all do not believe in science .....the science is against you so you attack science...facts are pesky things...you all are fringe elements
again statements which have no evidence of validity.Scientists give Earth s climate annual physical highlight ridiculous ocean heating Globalnews.ca
WASHINGTON – In their annual, detailed physical of Earth’s climate, scientists say the world is in increasingly hot and rising water.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the American Meteorological Society’s annual state of the climate report delves into the details of already reported record-smashing warmth globally in 2014, giving special attention to the world’s oceans.
READ MORE:Study finds no ‘hiatus’ for global warming as temperatures rise
NOAA climate monitoring chief Deke Arndt, co-editor of the report, said the seas last year “were just ridiculous.”
The report said ocean surface temperatures were the warmest in 135 years of records, with the seas holding record levels of heat energy at lower depths. Sea level also hit modern highs.
Jeff Severinghaus of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography said if this report is Earth’s annual checkup, “the doctor is saying ‘you are gravely ill.”‘
You can follow anyone you wish, just doesn't make it correct, and again, you have zero evidence of support or data to validate. just opinion. At least you admit that much.I am going with this guy's opinions over yours based on his credentials as compared to yoursTemperatures by ANY Global measurement haven't risen by more 0.08degC/decade over the hiatus..
A lot of noise about 2 digits to the right of decimal right. Or didn't you know that??
...I got to go to the GFDL - the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab - near Princeton, N.J. and interview the director, Jerry Mahlman. The GFDL was, and still is, one of the top climate research centers in the world. Remember, this was nearly 20 years ago. When I asked him about the global warming “debate," he said: “The debate on that is over.” He also said no one storm could be blamed on global warming. This all sounds pretty familiar, huh?
SO WHAT DOES “THE DEBATE IS OVER” MEAN?
Dr. Mahlman noticed the confused look on my face. Debate over? Mahlman said he was talking about theBASIC SCIENCEof global warming: that added carbon dioxide will (and has already) warmed the earth. That’s it. “We got past that years ago,” he said. Now we’re debating how much it will warm, just how cloud cover will affect warming, the effect of volcanoes-and oceans. There was a lot of stuff to debate back then -- and today, too.
Read more at Hurricane Schwartz Are you climate change rejector or acceptor
liar. I have asked you for that list of several thousand and you failed to present. Until you do, this is made up bullshit.Several thousand PhD have produced the AGW theory through valid published research. Those very scientists would be the first to term what YOU believe "pseudoscience".
and you have no experiment that actually proves the physics. It still has to be proven fool. You have it?Actually, some people are intelligent enough to discern the difference between science and pseudoscience.Idiots say a lot of things.
you just proved it ....you all do not believe in science .....the science is against you so you attack science...facts are pesky things...you all are fringe elements
You CAGW doomsday cultists are not included in that group.
The green house effect is based on advance physics. Have you ever took a single class in such? lol
well I laugh at you for believing agencies who fudge data.Anyone who believes that IPCC reporsts
Your post is unintelligible.Actually, some people are intelligent enough to discern the difference between science and pseudoscience.Idiots say a lot of things.
you just proved it ....you all do not believe in science .....the science is against you so you attack science...facts are pesky things...you all are fringe elements
You CAGW doomsday cultists are not included in that group.
The green house effect is based on advance physics. Have you ever took a single class in such? lol
lol, you're laughable. I'll stick with nasa, noaa and most universities on this planet over your stupid ass.
again the link that makes me laugh at you for trusting in agencies that commit fraud.I love the noaa, nws and nasa!!! I'd honestly double all of their budgets and laugh at you bastards as I am doing it.
for me, I use my ability to research and think for myself. I expect things from science, and to date, you nor anyone else who is a warmer has ever supplied one experiment that proves any of your claim. Now, tell me science doesn't count on experimental evidence to confirm a hypothesis. Let's see how much science knowledge you do have.Tell us your qualification EinsteinOf course, you'll do that because you're ignorant regarding the subject. You don't know any better, so you don't have much choice.
what method you use ...reading sheep entrails...you all are anti science mumbo jumboistas ...Science just accomplished the Pluto fly by...you all just fly by facys logic and science...One of you nut bags said all of the scientist who say there is global warming are corrupoted by money and the only real ones are tied to the fossil fuel industry...yes yes you all that stupid...
and again as written several hundred times in the forum, it's called money. Anytime you pull some data from some agency who isn't being paid by a government and actually believes in GW, it would be a first.answer this question
How come the Science establishment believes in human related Global warming and you all do not...what are you followers of...who among you have expertise or can cite a peer reviewed paper that supports your "sheep entrails nonsense"
Herr Koch 1901 experiment. go read about it. No one has debunked it with another experiment. no one.answer this question
How come the Science establishment believes in human related Global warming and you all do not...what are you followers of...who among you have expertise or can cite a peer reviewed paper that supports your "sheep entrails nonsense"
Herr Koch says you're wrong back in 1901.Hey Einstein quote some of your scientists [LOL]...what do the witch doctors say about global warming Babalu aye... the established science says one thing and bitter clingers say another LOLThe left wing zealots are laughable. They will not look at the science and when they are called on it they refuse to produce credible science of any kind..
The adjustments to the records are arbitrary and without basis in facts or reason... They are done because the data did not match their fantasy models. So rather than admit their theroy wrong they have manufactured data..
Politically driven BULL SHIT!