- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.
This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.
Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.
The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.
Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.
Future elections will never be the same.
Or you just live a clean life where no one can accuse you of anything. Or we get over this kind of thing and admit it doesn't matter.
Republicans have no room to bitch about this after going after Clinton they way they did, and Democrats have no room to bitch after going after Clarance Thomas the way they did.
Regardless of the details, I think this whole incident shows that Cain is not ready for the job. He had 10 days or 10 years to prepare for this reckoning, and he was caught flatfooted.
Sorry, I want a guy who can think on his feet.
Your first paragraph will never happen. The rest is spot on.