This COMPLETE DESTRUCTION of Cain by the MSM will be the new standard we can expect

[Vaard]

This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.

This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.

Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.

The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.

Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.

Future elections will never be the same.

You think this is new? Have been paying attention?

I've answered this already but at the risk of being insulted for asking you to read the thread ill answer again.

The attempt to completely derail a legit front runners chances at winning are not a first.

THE COMPLETE SUCCESS OF SAID ATTEMPT IS NEW.

This WILL now embolden the MSM to go even further in their reporting in any future attempts to alter an outcome. Things have now officially changed.

They tried to kill Bush with the military story. Failed
They tried to kill Obama with Wright. Failed
They succeeded with Cain.

they suceeded with edwards last election.......

 

[Chris]

You think this is new? Have been paying attention?

I've answered this already but at the risk of being insulted for asking you to read the thread ill answer again.

The attempt to completely derail a legit front runners chances at winning are not a first.

THE COMPLETE SUCCESS OF SAID ATTEMPT IS NEW.

This WILL now embolden the MSM to go even further in their reporting in any future attempts to alter an outcome. Things have now officially changed.

They tried to kill Bush with the military story. Failed
They tried to kill Obama with Wright. Failed
They succeeded with Cain.

This is NOT over yet. WHY so quick to count Mr. Cain down and out?

Because Cain hired a campaign manager who was banned from Wisconsin politics for illegal funding.

Because his campaign manager started Cain's campaign with money from a Koch brothers non profit.

Which is a felony.

Because Cain has no political experience except working for the Federal Reserve and as a lobbyist.

Because Cain sexually harassed at least four women while working as a lobbyist.

Because Cain is not qualified in ANY way to be president of the United States.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In another generation, assuming the Libs don't push the USA off the cliff before then, the LMSM is done

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You think this is new? Have been paying attention?

I've answered this already but at the risk of being insulted for asking you to read the thread ill answer again.

The attempt to completely derail a legit front runners chances at winning are not a first.

THE COMPLETE SUCCESS OF SAID ATTEMPT IS NEW.

This WILL now embolden the MSM to go even further in their reporting in any future attempts to alter an outcome. Things have now officially changed.

They tried to kill Bush with the military story. Failed
They tried to kill Obama with Wright. Failed
They succeeded with Cain.

This is NOT over yet. WHY so quick to count Mr. Cain down and out?

I believe that middle America has been submerged by this story for so long that they will exercise caution and shy away. It culminated today with the farce of Gloria standing next to a supposed victim that apparently couldn't recall such a terrible life experience from memory and had to read a script. The damage is done. I would be absolutely stunned if he recovered from this.

 

[jillian]

yes the MSM made Cain change his story 3-4 times. The MSM, Cain, and the NRA are all in on it together just to punk you.

seriously this is what?, the 4th-5th time you have brought up this argument in a thread?

It seems apparent you don't understand the timeline of what has happened and why.
It seems you never will and no matter how many facts about Cain are thrown in your face, that bubble you enclose yourself in won't pop.

Cain got a fair shake. He had his 1, 2, 3 times to explain himself. He didnt and got caught up in the lie. This is what liars do when caught. They make up more lies, and more lies in order to try to get out of the lie.

This is the first time I've brought up this analysis. If your sensibilities are so tender that my posts bother you I suggest you stop clicking on them. Your constant whining is pathetic.

different ways of saying the same nonsense, gramps.

but let's look at the logical failures in your argument.
a) stories circulate about this person who wants to be president having a history of sexual harassment;
b) this person who wants to be president lies and tells three different stories.
c) it becomes clear that the story was probably leaked by a fellow GOP-er...
d) other people come to light who have similar stories.
e) this person who wants to be president and his teanut gallery whine that the media is being mean to him instead of acknowledging that it isn't the media who caused his problems.

i figure he never thought his practical joke would go this far so never thought he'd have to address his past behavior.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

wow welcome to the new era of Media. I didnt realize you where just discovering the year 1995

What front runner for president did the media destroy in 1995? Or were you just attempting another failed insult?

no you were talking about the 24/7 news cycle.
This was going on back in the 90's and it got really faster because of the internet.

I am explaining it to you.

You're really lost if you think this thread is about when the 24/7 cycle started. I watched CNN when they were the only game in town. Still has nothing to do with the point of this thread though.

I'll put up a lost dog sign for you. Maybe there is hope for you.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

yes the MSM made Cain change his story 3-4 times. The MSM, Cain, and the NRA are all in on it together just to punk you.

seriously this is what?, the 4th-5th time you have brought up this argument in a thread?

It seems apparent you don't understand the timeline of what has happened and why.
It seems you never will and no matter how many facts about Cain are thrown in your face, that bubble you enclose yourself in won't pop.

Cain got a fair shake. He had his 1, 2, 3 times to explain himself. He didnt and got caught up in the lie. This is what liars do when caught. They make up more lies, and more lies in order to try to get out of the lie.

This is the first time I've brought up this analysis. If your sensibilities are so tender that my posts bother you I suggest you stop clicking on them. Your constant whining is pathetic.

different ways of saying the same nonsense, gramps.

but let's look at the logical failures in your argument.
a) stories circulate about this person who wants to be president having a history of sexual harassment;
b) this person who wants to be president lies and tells three different stories.
c) it becomes clear that the story was probably leaked by a fellow GOP-er...
d) other people come to light who have similar stories.
e) this person who wants to be president and his teanut gallery whine that the media is being mean to him instead of acknowledging that it isn't the media who caused his problems.

i figure he never thought his practical joke would go this far so never thought he'd have to address his past behavior.

a) "stories"
A1) stories with no proof or evidence.

All other points moot if the media was ethical.

 

[Dr Grump]

This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.

This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.

Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.

The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.

Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.

Future elections will never be the same.

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

no you were talking about the 24/7 news cycle.
This was going on back in the 90's and it got really faster because of the internet.

I am explaining it to you.

You're really lost if you think this thread is about when the 24/7 cycle started. I watched CNN when they were the only game in town. Still has nothing to do with the point of this thread though.

I'll put up a lost dog sign for you. Maybe there is hope for you.

but you brought it up........

If you were capable of following a conversation you might not have gotten lost on the context.

Keep trying son. Someday you'll be successful.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.

This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.

Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.

The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.

Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.

Future elections will never be the same.

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

 

[The T]

This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.

This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.

Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.

The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.

Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.

Future elections will never be the same.

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

Absolutely. The Swiftboat Vets. I still have a DVD they sent to me. They nailed his ass.

 

[The T]

you couldnt offend me if you had willowtree's brain.

Then WHY do YOU keep coming back, PlasmaBalless?

i like watching drunks struggle with simple english

Again? You come back...baseless as usual.

 

[WillowTree]

yes the MSM made Cain change his story 3-4 times. The MSM, Cain, and the NRA are all in on it together just to punk you.

seriously this is what?, the 4th-5th time you have brought up this argument in a thread?

It seems apparent you don't understand the timeline of what has happened and why.
It seems you never will and no matter how many facts about Cain are thrown in your face, that bubble you enclose yourself in won't pop.

Cain got a fair shake. He had his 1, 2, 3 times to explain himself. He didnt and got caught up in the lie. This is what liars do when caught. They make up more lies, and more lies in order to try to get out of the lie.

This is the first time I've brought up this analysis. If your sensibilities are so tender that my posts bother you I suggest you stop clicking on them. Your constant whining is pathetic.

different ways of saying the same nonsense, gramps.

but let's look at the logical failures in your argument.
a) stories circulate about this person who wants to be president having a history of sexual harassment;
b) this person who wants to be president lies and tells three different stories.
c) it becomes clear that the story was probably leaked by a fellow GOP-er...
d) other people come to light who have similar stories.
e) this person who wants to be president and his teanut gallery whine that the media is being mean to him instead of acknowledging that it isn't the media who caused his problems.

i figure he never thought his practical joke would go this far so never thought he'd have to address his past behavior.

did obama lie when he said he never heard Wright say those terrible things in 20 long damn years? and you voted for a liar anyway didn't you?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

commericals are media...

Lol, umm what?

Something tells me I should stop debating you.

Your either really really stupid or a complete partisan hack.

 

[The T]

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

commericals are media...

Lol, umm what?

Something tells me I should stop debating you.

Your either really really stupid or a complete partisan hack.

The latter would be correct. Hack. Brainless one at that.

 

[jillian]

This is the first time I've brought up this analysis. If your sensibilities are so tender that my posts bother you I suggest you stop clicking on them. Your constant whining is pathetic.

different ways of saying the same nonsense, gramps.

but let's look at the logical failures in your argument.
a) stories circulate about this person who wants to be president having a history of sexual harassment;
b) this person who wants to be president lies and tells three different stories.
c) it becomes clear that the story was probably leaked by a fellow GOP-er...
d) other people come to light who have similar stories.
e) this person who wants to be president and his teanut gallery whine that the media is being mean to him instead of acknowledging that it isn't the media who caused his problems.

i figure he never thought his practical joke would go this far so never thought he'd have to address his past behavior.

a) "stories"
A1) stories with no proof or evidence.

All other points moot if the media was ethical.

there IS proof that there were past complaints. cain (after lying for a while) admitted it.

i'm sorry that you feel cranky that the truth was printed.

i suppose the media could focus on the kenyansocialistmuslim

or would you prefer we talk about how bill clinton killed vince foster.

 

[Dr Grump]

This isn't about guilt or innocence. No proof is truly known beyond he said she said. Many a man were found guilty or innocent with less proof.

This is about the personal destruction of a candidate based merely on the words of a couple people. This destruction is done through beating the drums of a story that offered less proof than the actual words and action of Rev Wright or Aeyrs.

Our media is now officially in charge of who can make a splash in politics and who can't and that's just wrong. Now don't get me wrong I believe that the story was worthy of being reported once or twice but with no new evidence the constant barrage of this story in the media was unethical by journalistic standards. The story was hyped to the point that any person seeking their 15 minutes of fame could now put themselves in the limelight with just the slightest involvement with Cain in the past.

The Duke Lacross team is a perfect example of the power of the media. They had everyone convicting the team by simply pounding the story over and over.

Weather or not you believe Cain was the right man for the job one thing is sure. He is an eligible American that deserved a fair shake in the process. He did not receive that fair shake. Being a journalist used to be a dignified job. Now its about ratings and sales.

Future elections will never be the same.

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

Which the press happily ran.

That is all the press are doing now. Running with a story....thats' their job..

 

[Dr Grump]

Welcome to John Kerry's run for president. Were you concerned about him like you are Cain?

Kerry was derailed by the commercials of a 3rd party. Not the media. Nice try.

Absolutely. The Swiftboat Vets. I still have a DVD they sent to me. They nailed his ass.

Yet more proof that the T is a gullible schmuck...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

different ways of saying the same nonsense, gramps.

but let's look at the logical failures in your argument.
a) stories circulate about this person who wants to be president having a history of sexual harassment;
b) this person who wants to be president lies and tells three different stories.
c) it becomes clear that the story was probably leaked by a fellow GOP-er...
d) other people come to light who have similar stories.
e) this person who wants to be president and his teanut gallery whine that the media is being mean to him instead of acknowledging that it isn't the media who caused his problems.

i figure he never thought his practical joke would go this far so never thought he'd have to address his past behavior.

a) "stories"
A1) stories with no proof or evidence.

All other points moot if the media was ethical.

there IS proof that there were past complaints. cain (after lying for a while) admitted it.

i'm sorry that you feel cranky that the truth was printed.

i suppose the media could focus on the kenyansocialistmuslim

or would you prefer we talk about how bill clinton killed vince foster.

There was proof of a complaint. NOTHING MORE. Yet it was reported on every hour on the hour.

My point is clear and your Clinton bait is pointless.

 

[Dr Grump]

a) "stories"
A1) stories with no proof or evidence.

All other points moot if the media was ethical.

there IS proof that there were past complaints. cain (after lying for a while) admitted it.

i'm sorry that you feel cranky that the truth was printed.

i suppose the media could focus on the kenyansocialistmuslim

or would you prefer we talk about how bill clinton killed vince foster.

There was proof of a complaint. NOTHING MORE. Yet it was reported on every hour on the hour.

My point is clear and your Clinton bait is pointless.

Er, there are actually four complaints...as far as I know at least two of them are totally unrelated....

He's a front runner for the presidency of the US, he is gonna come under one huge microscope. Same thing happened to Clinton over Jennifer Flowers BEFORE he was pres. If Cain is good enough, he'll get through. But he's not. He comes across as brighter than Dumbya.....just...so that ain't saying much...