The Democrat party- the party of violence

[FranklinRoosevelt_FTW]

From your article...

Let's start w/the title:

"Suggests" isn't leading towards hard facts.




"Probably" isn't leading towards hard facts.


The author invented his methodology, states that it's estimated, going off of shoddy at best records, again, not strong on hard facts.


Again admits to how bogus his own work is.

This is what we're supposed to go on? It's not even a book, a series of books or documents, it's a snippet from a single article that the author is wish-casting to be true/factual.

Do better dude.

Blacks owned many white slaves It’s an undeniable fact.

Your post doesn’t negate the fact

BLM leaders are trying to gain a political power-play by the reparations argument.

We all descend from slaves and slave owners. The BLM narrative is insane. Forget about the white and black thing everyone engaged in the slave trade in history.

The BLM narrative seeks to make white people feel bad and Black people also feel bad. It’s a weak argument it’s a feminized disgraceful argument. Nobody’s buying it.. wokeness is dangerous and on the way out

 

[MarcATL]

Blacks owned many white slaves It’s an undeniable fact.

Your post doesn’t negate the fact

BLM leaders are trying to gain a political power-play by the reparations argument.

We all descend from slaves and slave owners. The BLM narrative is insane. Forget about the white and black thing everyone engaged in the slave trade in history.

The BLM narrative seeks to make white people feel bad and Black people also feel bad. It’s a weak argument it’s a feminized disgraceful argument. Nobody’s buying it.. wokeness is dangerous and on the way out

White supremacy is dangerous and on its way out. #DealWithIt

 

[scruffy]

Yeah dumbass, the is no political party in power called the Democrat party, illiterate bastards.

Sorry, you don't get to choose your pronouns.

 

[BlindBoo]

Blacks owned many white slaves It’s an undeniable fact.

Yeah sure. In North Africa between the 1500's thru 1900's. estimates are up to a million or so were captured by pirates and sold. Exponentially less than the est.14 million Africans who suffered that fate.

In America only the Africans were bound to their slavery in perpetuity. Whites were not.

 

[Moonglow]

Sorry, you don't get to choose your pronouns.

It's called a proper noun, duh.

 

[scruffy]

It's called a proper noun, duh.

There's nothing proper about leftards.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

From your article...

Let's start w/the title:

"Suggests" isn't leading towards hard facts.




"Probably" isn't leading towards hard facts.


The author invented his methodology, states that it's estimated, going off of shoddy at best records, again, not strong on hard facts.


Again admits to how bogus his own work is.

This is what we're supposed to go on? It's not even a book, a series of books or documents, it's a snippet from a single article that the author is wish-casting to be true/factual.

Do better dude.

It's true, there wasn't somebody standing on the shore, counting up all the white slaves.

So, what was the real number?

 

[MarcATL]

It's true, there wasn't somebody standing on the shore, counting up all the white slaves.

So, what was the real number?

I don't care. What's the point of that information?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I don't care. What's the point of that information?

Whites were slaves too.

 

[MarcATL]

Whites were slaves too.

Not here in America though. so I fail to see the relevance

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not here in America though. so I fail to see the relevance

Who claimed it was in America?

I'll add it to the long list of things you fail to see.