So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
So you don't know?I started to read up on it, but they talked about Nephites, Lamanites and the Jaredites. What happened to them? They weren't on Noah's boat, so they all died in the flood?
Read the book and find out
So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
You got it. crook from head to toe.
So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
You cant plagarize what you claim was written by others.
And for someone with such a self proclaimed knowledge of Mormons, you seem to be asking alot of ignorant questions.
So you don't know?Read the book and find out
I know. The point is for you to know. And it's much better for you to get first hand knowledge than second hand knowledge. Even if it's accurate.
There is nothing similiar whatoever between the Jaredites destruction and Sodom & Gomorrah.
So in addition to being a pedophile and a con artist, Joseph Smith was also a plagarist?
You cant plagarize what you claim was written by others.
And for someone with such a self proclaimed knowledge of Mormons, you seem to be asking alot of ignorant questions.
Actually, it was a rhertorical question. Joseph Smith's Plagarism is an established fact.
Mormonism Disproved - Plagiarism
So you don't know?
I know. The point is for you to know. And it's much better for you to get first hand knowledge than second hand knowledge. Even if it's accurate.
Ok, so the Ns and the Ls fought in the Americas over and over. So my question would be: is there any archeological evidence of the battles or the people? If not, how can I be expected to believe this?
There is nothing similiar whatoever between the Jaredites destruction and Sodom & Gomorrah.
people turned wicked. prophet sent to tell them to repent. all jaredites destroyed except ether. All S&Gians destroyed except lot. no similarity at all.
There is nothing similiar whatoever between the Jaredites destruction and Sodom & Gomorrah.
people turned wicked. prophet sent to tell them to repent. all jaredites destroyed except ether. All S&Gians destroyed except lot. no similarity at all.
What prophet was sent to tell S&G to repent? How is the Jaredites destroying each other anywhere close to the same as Fire from heaven destroying S&G?
The fact that they both happened and both resulted in people being destroyed doesn't mean they are copies of one another. Joshua's conquest of Canaan would be more of a parallel and even that seems like a stretch.
Also, more Jaredites survived than just Ether. I highly recommend reading the Book of Mormon for yourself and finding out.
So there's zero proof whatsoever of them? That means you have nothing, just fiction, not fact.I know. The point is for you to know. And it's much better for you to get first hand knowledge than second hand knowledge. Even if it's accurate.
Ok, so the Ns and the Ls fought in the Americas over and over. So my question would be: is there any archeological evidence of the battles or the people? If not, how can I be expected to believe this?
by reading the Book of Mormon and finding out from God whether it's true.
There is no archaelogical evidence for the resurrection of Christ. That doesn't make it false. There is no archaelogical evidence for alot of things we know.
The fact that you are making the call for archaelogical evidence tells me you don't understand the difficulty of finding evidence, even for history that is established or what archaelogy actually tells us. We could have tons of archaelogical evidence that would be simply impossible to identify as Nephite or Lamanite.
But if you want some Archaelogical evidence. look up Nahom/Bountiful trip through Arabia. Some pretty good evidence right now. Evidence which demands an answer to a question: How did an uneducated farmboy on the edge of the American frontier describe a path from Jerusalem to the East coast of Arabia that exists with the correct names of locations which was hidden from the world until nearly 150 years after he described it perfectly?
[
If by established fact, you mean there is absolutely zero evidence of plagarism. Then yes it's an established fact.
In order to be plagarized, you have to:
1) Take credit for someone else's work
2) Without citing that work
You're biggest hurdle in your charge is that Joseph Smith never claimed to write the Book of Mormon. He claimed that Mormon and Moroni wrote most of it.
There have been countless attempts by people to show a comtemporary of Joseph Smith wrote it instead. Problem is when you actually look at the works that the Book of Mormon was supposedly "stolen" from they are nothing alike.
And you can't say he plagarized from the Bible because the Bible chapters found in the Book of Mormon are correctly cited to their author, Mostly Isaiah.
But of course you'll just ignore this and claim he plagarized it. Just like you continue to make the false claim of pedophilia against him. Because you don't really care about the truth.
Tell me, if it's established fact that Joseph Smith plagarized the Book of Mormon, why is it that almost 200 years later, critics of the Book of Mormon are still trying to find a credible explanation for where it comes from?