rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 21,198
- 4,492
- 290
In my opinion, a Deylicate would already have initiatives in progress. What objection can there be to a Dey.We have had discussions on two-state, three-state and one-state "solutions" - this is a new one that has not had a discussion devoted to it. Thank you rylah for bringing it up.
The link is: Palestinian Emirates Introduction
The idea is fascinating. I disagree with some of his historic preamble...but that is neither hear nor there.
Some of the points he makes are valid imo. The non-nationalist loyalties of the Palestinian's themselves that is also reflective of the Arab culture surrounding them in general - stronger loyalties to family, tribe and locale than to a "nation". This is evident in the high degree of corruption in the ruling parties. A more local governance might be more effective. There was a day when city-states were common - before the idea of nation states came into being. This might be a viable answer.
My one major concern is this. Dr. Kedar makes a point that no Jewish families should be forced to move (as would happen in a two-state solution) - but, in this solution - neither should any Palestinian families. Their right to remain where they are must be preserved.
What are your thoughts on this?
Conflict in the Middle East is becoming a Proverb. There are plenty of emirs.
One of the objections is that a dey has nothing to do with the society at hand.
I know Arab Sheikhs, I haven't met a Dey in my life or heard an Arab mention such a position,
Last edited: