The Left made sure only Whites are allowed on product packaging, now they’re going full steam in eliminating women from public view.
I'm collecting examples of this avoidance of the word "woman" and the resultant etiolation of speech.
In "Abortion bans and penalties would vary widely by state,"Politico quotes Farah Diaz-Tello, senior counsel to something called If/When/How:
"Even if a bill doesn’t allow pregnant people to be charged directly, we’re concerned about the ways increased surveillance could lead to people being criminalized for an abortion or another kind of pregnancy loss....These bills create an environment where a person’s private health information, their affect and demeanor and whether they are sufficiently distraught, could all become evidence in a case against someone else. They could still be treated as a suspect."
Here's the webpage for If/When/How, subtitled "Lawyering for Reproductive Justice." It describes its purpose without saying "women":
"If/When/How envisions a transformation of the legal systems and institutions that perpetuate oppression into structures that realize justice, and a future when all people can self-determine their reproductive lives free from discrimination, coercion, or violence. We transform the law and policy landscape through advocacy, support, and organizing so all people have the power to determine if, when, and how to define, create, and sustain families with dignity and to actualize sexual and reproductive wellbeing on their own terms.
althouse.blogspot.com
I'm collecting examples of this avoidance of the word "woman" and the resultant etiolation of speech.
In "Abortion bans and penalties would vary widely by state,"Politico quotes Farah Diaz-Tello, senior counsel to something called If/When/How:
"Even if a bill doesn’t allow pregnant people to be charged directly, we’re concerned about the ways increased surveillance could lead to people being criminalized for an abortion or another kind of pregnancy loss....These bills create an environment where a person’s private health information, their affect and demeanor and whether they are sufficiently distraught, could all become evidence in a case against someone else. They could still be treated as a suspect."
Here's the webpage for If/When/How, subtitled "Lawyering for Reproductive Justice." It describes its purpose without saying "women":
"If/When/How envisions a transformation of the legal systems and institutions that perpetuate oppression into structures that realize justice, and a future when all people can self-determine their reproductive lives free from discrimination, coercion, or violence. We transform the law and policy landscape through advocacy, support, and organizing so all people have the power to determine if, when, and how to define, create, and sustain families with dignity and to actualize sexual and reproductive wellbeing on their own terms.
If you won't say "women," you are embracing the self-subordination of weak political speech.
I'm collecting examples of this avoidance of the word "woman" and the resultant etiolation of speech. In "Abortion bans and penalties would ...
althouse.blogspot.com
