- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
he was not convicted of anything
I see - he was acquitted and decided to be crucified anyway for fun....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
he was not convicted of anything
Man, you love displaying your complete ignorance.you're totally ignorant on Christianity
This from someone believes Jesus was the Son of God, but cannot explain why he couldn't do shit in his trial, why his disciples bolted on him, and why nobody who was "healed" showed up at the trial to defend the FRAUD....
When Moses "looked different" coming down the mountain, why was it necessary for the Levites to off 3500 people???
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
dex----in the field of psychiatry---your manner of thinking is called "concrete". Concrete thinking
is a very broad clinical sign----associated with lots of
conditions ranging from congenital dementia, to acquired dementia, all the way to psychosis. Now
tell us again just how "TRIALS" were conducted in
roman ruled Judea
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
dex----in the field of psychiatry---your manner of thinking is called "concrete". Concrete thinking
is a very broad clinical sign----associated with lots of
conditions ranging from congenital dementia, to acquired dementia, all the way to psychosis. Now
tell us again just how "TRIALS" were conducted in
roman ruled Judea
Can you point to an instance of concrete thinking in LaDexter's post you quoted?
There is no such excessive concrete thinking in any of LaDexter's post as to qualify it as a disorder, everyone uses a combination of both concrete and abstract thinking to varying degrees. Your post seems like an uncalled for personal attack on LaDexter.
Actually all evidences point to you having some psychological disorder, none of your posts seem to be complete, all of them seem to contain fragmented thoughts, with unnecessary and excessive use of hypens, what psychological disorder would you be suffering?
Jesus Christ was a fraud no doubt, he couldn't save himself, how will he save anyone from anything? If he was a G-D why didn't he protect himself from his abusers? He had delusions of grandeur, coveted riches and kingdoms which weren't his, why was he calling himself King of Jews when he wasn't one?
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
dex----in the field of psychiatry---your manner of thinking is called "concrete". Concrete thinking
is a very broad clinical sign----associated with lots of
conditions ranging from congenital dementia, to acquired dementia, all the way to psychosis. Now
tell us again just how "TRIALS" were conducted in
roman ruled Judea
Can you point to an instance of concrete thinking in LaDexter's post you quoted?
There is no such excessive concrete thinking in any of LaDexter's post as to qualify it as a disorder, everyone uses a combination of both concrete and abstract thinking to varying degrees. Your post seems like an uncalled for personal attack on LaDexter.
Actually all evidences point to you having some psychological disorder, none of your posts seem to be complete, all of them seem to contain fragmented thoughts, with unnecessary and excessive use of hypens, what psychological disorder would you be suffering?
Jesus Christ was a fraud no doubt, he couldn't save himself, how will he save anyone from anything? If he was a G-D why didn't he protect himself from his abusers? He had delusions of grandeur, coveted riches and kingdoms which weren't his, why was he calling himself King of Jews when he wasn't one?
do you have a citation for your theory that overuse of
HYPHENS---is evidence of a "psychological disorder"?
Feel free to consult the DSM (infinity)
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
dex----in the field of psychiatry---your manner of thinking is called "concrete". Concrete thinking
is a very broad clinical sign----associated with lots of
conditions ranging from congenital dementia, to acquired dementia, all the way to psychosis. Now
tell us again just how "TRIALS" were conducted in
roman ruled Judea
Can you point to an instance of concrete thinking in LaDexter's post you quoted?
There is no such excessive concrete thinking in any of LaDexter's post as to qualify it as a disorder, everyone uses a combination of both concrete and abstract thinking to varying degrees. Your post seems like an uncalled for personal attack on LaDexter.
Actually all evidences point to you having some psychological disorder, none of your posts seem to be complete, all of them seem to contain fragmented thoughts, with unnecessary and excessive use of hypens, what psychological disorder would you be suffering?
Jesus Christ was a fraud no doubt, he couldn't save himself, how will he save anyone from anything? If he was a G-D why didn't he protect himself from his abusers? He had delusions of grandeur, coveted riches and kingdoms which weren't his, why was he calling himself King of Jews when he wasn't one?
do you have a citation for your theory that overuse of
HYPHENS---is evidence of a "psychological disorder"?
Feel free to consult the DSM (infinity)
No, that's why I asked you, as you seem to be diagnosing members with psychological disorder
silly-------idea-----really----dim------
But your usage of hyphens do seem to point to a psychological disorder.
silly-------idea-----really----dim------
silly-------idea-----really----dim------
Can you please answer the ones in blue?
Can you point to an instance of concrete thinking in LaDexter's post you quoted?
Jesus Christ was a fraud no doubt, he couldn't save himself, how will he save anyone from anything? If he was a G-D why didn't he protect himself from his abusers? He had delusions of grandeur, coveted riches and kingdoms which weren't his, why was he calling himself King of Jews when he wasn't one?
sheeeesh you want me to go back and look at all of
Dex's miserable posts? As to Jesus being "KING OF DA JOOOOS" the only info we have on the man is that which
appears in the NT (nothing much and even less reliable)---but no where does he announce himself "KING OF DA JOOS" The writers of the NT do IMPLY that by having him
born in Bethlehem ------and three magic MAGI with a BIG STAR ----etc etc -------and even the OMEN stuff------
but why blame Jesus for that "stuff" (please note---I did not write BS)
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
sheeeesh you want me to go back and look at all of
Dex's miserable posts? As to Jesus being "KING OF DA JOOOOS" the only info we have on the man is that which
appears in the NT (nothing much and even less reliable)---but no where does he announce himself "KING OF DA JOOS" The writers of the NT do IMPLY that by having him
born in Bethlehem ------and three magic MAGI with a BIG STAR ----etc etc -------and even the OMEN stuff------
but why blame Jesus for that "stuff" (please note---I did not write BS)
Not all of LaDexter's post, just the one you quoted, here I reproduced it below:
One more thing....
HOW COME the following NEVER SHOWED UP AT THE TRIAL???
1. all the people Jesus "healed"
2. his disciples
If someone who gave me sight when I was blind was on trial, I sure as heck would be obligated to testify on his behalf....
but none showed up to do so....
Most likely reason - the FRAUD never healed anyone
You wrote:"As to Jesus being "KING OF DA JOOOOS" the only info we have on the man is that which
appears in the NT (nothing much and even less reliable)---but no where does he announce himself "KING OF DA JOOS" The writers of the NT do IMPLY that by having him
born in Bethlehem ------and three magic MAGI with a BIG STAR ----etc etc -------and even the OMEN stuff------
but why blame Jesus for that "stuff" (please note---I did not write BS)"
In Gospel of John, it is written as him saying he is a King:
8 Bible verses about Jesus Christ, King
But Jesus Christ despite being a Son of God, couldn't save himself, so how will he save anyone? If he was G-D, why didn't he protect himself from his abusers?
no one knows who "JOHN" was and there is no evidence that "JOHN" ever met Jesus. Don't blame Jesus.
As to WITNESSES to the miracles wrought by Jesus-----he was not be TRIED for "MIRACLES". No one said "PROVE YOU DID MIRACLES" There was an issue of
BLASHEMY-----as if just the uttering of a nutty statement would result in the death penalty by the "SANHEDRIN"-----<<<< actually a nutty idea. They story is that jesus refuse to deny that he is "the messiah" so they sentenced him to death-------quite an innovation-----no such stuff ever happened before. The WHOLE STORY IS SUSPECT. Such a person would be deemed NUTS------not "stoneable"
Dexie seems to imagine that if he PROVED he was divine----
that would have saved him-------???? ---besides---CAIAPHAS AND ANNAS were known roman shills------they just DID what rome wanted them to do (make that Pilate)
no one knows who "JOHN" was and there is no evidence that "JOHN" ever met Jesus. Don't blame Jesus.
As to WITNESSES to the miracles wrought by Jesus-----he was not be TRIED for "MIRACLES". No one said "PROVE YOU DID MIRACLES" There was an issue of
BLASHEMY-----as if just the uttering of a nutty statement would result in the death penalty by the "SANHEDRIN"-----<<<< actually a nutty idea. They story is that jesus refuse to deny that he is "the messiah" so they sentenced him to death-------quite an innovation-----no such stuff ever happened before. The WHOLE STORY IS SUSPECT. Such a person would be deemed NUTS------not "stoneable"
Dexie seems to imagine that if he PROVED he was divine----
that would have saved him-------???? ---besides---CAIAPHAS AND ANNAS were known roman shills------they just DID what rome wanted them to do (make that Pilate)
But wouldn't being a messiah mean that he would have had divine power and been able to protect himself? And if he couldn't protect himself from his abusers, doesn't it mean that he was just a normal human being? So is the entire Christianity belief in Jesus Christ as G-D to spite the Sanhedrin and people who crucified Jesus Christ?
no-----messiahs have never been described as magicians.
The Sanhedrin had nothing to do with it ----it is not entirely
clear to me that either ANNAS or CAIAPHAS were Sanhedrin judges------they were Temple priests appointed by the Romans. Sunday school teachers seem to have a problem knowing the difference
no-----messiahs have never been described as magicians.
The Sanhedrin had nothing to do with it ----it is not entirely
clear to me that either ANNAS or CAIAPHAS were Sanhedrin judges------they were Temple priests appointed by the Romans. Sunday school teachers seem to have a problem knowing the difference
Are you contradicting yourself? In an earlier post you wrote Sanhedrin sentenced Jesus Christ to death penalty for claiming to be the messiah. Now you are saying they didn't have anything to do with crucifixion?
And according to Wikipedia being a messiah means being a king too.
Jesus Christ is reported to have performed miracles, that would mean that he had supernatural powers, he also claimed to be the son of God, which would make him divine, why didn't he use his divine supernatural powers to protect himself from his abusers?
People will believe what they want and you have no power to change that. Get over it.One of two things was true, either Jesus was the son of God complete with power to heal, or he was a total fraud, had no powers, and was just a man who lied a lot....
THE EVIDENCE....
Clearly, his disciples knew whether Jesus was a fraud or not, as they were the ones who "observed" all his "miracles." Two disciples saw Jesus walk on water, but when everyone was watching, Jesus sunk right to the bottom meeting John the Baptist. In place at the time is the Old Testament, so the following logic applies...
GOD controls whether or not you go to Heaven or Hell.
If you believe this guy is GOD's son, do you betray him???
Judas did. Did Judas do that knowing Jesus was really the Son of God, or did Judas do that because Judas knew Jesus was a fraud and did not want to end up on a cross next to him. All the disciples betray Jesus when the "cops" arrest him. They deny they knew him, all offenses against God's son that God would clearly know about....
IF Jesus was really healing people left and right, he would've been really popular. But he was clearly a lot less popular than Barabbas.....
and why is he running from the authorities??
This is the Son of God. Why FEAR??? Why RUN??? If you are the son of God, show them.....
and then his trial proved Judas correct.... that he was just a man, and died on the cross like a man, in the time of a man, as he aged during his life like a man....
and even the blood on the Shroud of Turin is HUMAN blood, product of HUMAN MAN AND WOMAN.....
Seriously motherfucker.
You're gonna attempt to denigrate the Son of God?
The guy who sacrificed himself for you, in case you didn't want to be an asshat?
You don't deserve to be breathing oxygen, seriously.
People will believe what they want and you have no power to change that. Get over it.
Seriously motherfucker.
You're gonna attempt to denigrate the Son of God?
The guy who sacrificed himself for you, in case you didn't want to be an asshat?
You don't deserve to be breathing oxygen, seriously.
This from yet another SUB HUMAN who never thinks, never asks, but only PARROTS...
You didn't observe Jesus, idiot. You cannot answer/refute my claims. But you can spazz out in a completely "un-Christian" way and out yourself as a SUB in the process....
Jesus was not even a good person. He deliberately bilked people, promised future "healing" and then disappeared... and that is why so many in Judea showed up to vote for Barabbas.... because they HATED the FRAUD.
why was he calling himself King of Jews when he wasn't one?