The future of the republican party...

no one 18 to 25 is ever a republican you douchebag.

:lol: That won't be true in the future when Michael Steele and the GOP try their new hip hop image.

They've already got the treatment of women down pat, along with all that wealth.

All they need now is giant clocks and we'll call em M.Cs. :lol:

M.C Palin and M.C Jindal are going for the nomination in 2012. But watch out, Romney the one and only mormon M.C has beef with that and will call them out for a war on the east side, west side, and all sides.

And don't forget Jebby Jazzy Bush who wants to continue the Bush family legacy and finish the job that OG Dubya started.

...:lol:
 
Last edited:
If it is to survive, should not rest in the hands of Bobby Jindal and Sarah Palin, but in the hands of governors like this:

John Huntsman
Charlie Crist

Both are moderate conservatives.

Don't worry. The American people are really dumb, so the Republicans will be back.

But don't expect it to happen short of a catastrophe, because the Republicans have lost a generation. No one 18-25 is Republican.

And you can not say the youth don't vote. That is no longer true. :clap2:

no one 18 to 25 is ever a republican you douchebag.
I was.
 
no one 18 to 25 is ever a republican you douchebag.

:lol: That won't be true in the future when Michael Steele and the GOP try their new hip hop image.

They've already got the treatment of women down pat, along with all that wealth.

All they need now is giant clocks and we'll call em M.Cs. :lol:

M.C Palin and M.C Jindal are going for the nomination in 2012. But watch out, Romney the one and only mormon M.C has beef with that and will call them out for a war on the east side, west side, and all sides.

And don't forget Jebby Jazzy Bush who wants to continue the Bush family legacy and finish the job that OG Dubya started.

...:lol:

Republican Gangsta Party Video by Jonathan - MySpace Video

:eusa_whistle:

Jeb has a shot. seriously. don't forget what Churchill said.
 
Jeb has a shot. seriously. don't forget what Churchill said.

Your right:

no one 18 to 25 is ever a republican you douchebag.
I was.

This?

Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains - Winston Churchill

:lol:

Though seriously, I understand what you're saying. The sad part is that 60% of Republicans actually would give another Bush a shot. You'd figure Bush 41 AND 43 were bad enough for this country.

Reminds me of the Who song:

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Jeb would get the republicans. Obama the dems. It's the people in the middle that he would have to convince.
 
Jeb would get the republicans. Obama the dems. It's the people in the middle that he would have to convince.

If, as has been predicted by many economist, the economy begins to revive late in 2009, the GOP is in even bigger trouble. They have been the obstructionist is the package Obama has advanced. The electorate will remember that. The centrist will remember that.

While they needed to suffer for 8 years, the Democrats should drop to their knees and thank W for bring near total ruin to the Republican party. :clap2:
 
Jeb would get the republicans. Obama the dems. It's the people in the middle that he would have to convince.

If, as has been predicted by many economist, the economy begins to revive late in 2009, the GOP is in even bigger trouble. They have been the obstructionist is the package Obama has advanced. The electorate will remember that. The centrist will remember that.

While they needed to suffer for 8 years, the Democrats should drop to their knees and thank W for bring near total ruin to the Republican party. :clap2:

in 2004, they said the same thing about the democrats.
 
Jeb would get the republicans. Obama the dems. It's the people in the middle that he would have to convince.

If, as has been predicted by many economist, the economy begins to revive late in 2009, the GOP is in even bigger trouble. They have been the obstructionist is the package Obama has advanced. The electorate will remember that. The centrist will remember that.

While they needed to suffer for 8 years, the Democrats should drop to their knees and thank W for bring near total ruin to the Republican party. :clap2:
People will remember that their children were saddled with the biggest debt in US history, dwarfing Boi moron dubya by two and three times.

The economy cannot possibly overcome that in a year.
 
Jeb would get the republicans. Obama the dems. It's the people in the middle that he would have to convince.

If, as has been predicted by many economist, the economy begins to revive late in 2009, the GOP is in even bigger trouble. They have been the obstructionist is the package Obama has advanced. The electorate will remember that. The centrist will remember that.

While they needed to suffer for 8 years, the Democrats should drop to their knees and thank W for bring near total ruin to the Republican party. :clap2:

The economy was going to revive, even without Obama's big government policies. The economy runs in cycles. Economist have been projecting the revival in spite of Obama. When it does, Obama will look like the Savior most think he is. Of course when it does rebound, the dollar will be the value of Monopoly money, energy costs will be through the roof, more businesses will be moving to get out from under crippling tax burdens, banks will be nationalized and the list goes on because government can do things much better than the private sector.
Obama's hatred for all things business and his love for all things government scares the hell out of me and many other's I do business with and talk to. I only hope we can weather the Democrat storm and when the time comes, present a true conservative candidate for 2012.
By the way, sticking to one's ideals and not just going along to get along is not obstructionist, just ask the Dems when they were in the minority. it is odd how the meaning of the terminology changes depending on who is in power.
 
Sorry under the dead wait of all this stupid government spending the economy is going no where and inflation is going though the roof.
 
If Rush is now the face of the Republican party, then he should run in 2010! I am suRe lots of the far right would vote for him. But remember that there will be lots of questioons for him to answer, such as, why he used prescription drugs illegally. GO RUSH!
 
Conservatism and reactionaryism are choices the GOP has to make.

If they want to appeal to moderates they will take a conservative line on social policy rather than the reactionaryism that their CPAC conference seems to be urging.

On economic policy I think they've been squeezed by the Dems. It's got to the point almost everywhere (except a few holdouts) where market economies rule and it's just a question of management of the economy rather than any ideological approach. GOP supporters need to drop the fantasy of Obama being a socialist. It's deluded. They'd be much better of focusing on the effective management of the economy by the administration rather than leaping up and down about some sort of fantasy that will not become reality.

Limbaugh and Coulter have to cease being the voice of the Republican Party. They don't care about the Party, they only care about themselves. They're salespeople, selling their image, appealing to base instinct to make money. That's fine, let them, but why the GOP is allowing these faux extremists to be their public face is beyond me. The moderates that have to be engaged for the GOP to get back into government are not convinced that Limbaugh and Coulter have any answers to difficult questions.

Ditch the reactionarysim. Forget the Reagan myth. Get back to Burkean conservatism.
 
If Rush is now the face of the Republican party, then he should run in 2010! I am suRe lots of the far right would vote for him. But remember that there will be lots of questioons for him to answer, such as, why he used prescription drugs illegally. GO RUSH!


Why would they make an issue out of that,when the could care less that Oblah blah used illegal drugs and paid a male prostitute for sex. GO Obama!
 
If Rush is now the face of the Republican party, then he should run in 2010! I am suRe lots of the far right would vote for him. But remember that there will be lots of questioons for him to answer, such as, why he used prescription drugs illegally. GO RUSH!


Why would they make an issue out of that,when the could care less that Oblah blah used illegal drugs and paid a male prostitute for sex. GO Obama!

Paid a male prostitute for sex? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
no one 18 to 25 is ever a republican you douchebag.

:lol: That won't be true in the future when Michael Steele and the GOP try their new hip hop image.

They've already got the treatment of women down pat, along with all that wealth.

All they need now is giant clocks and we'll call em M.Cs. :lol:

M.C Palin and M.C Jindal are going for the nomination in 2012. But watch out, Romney the one and only mormon M.C has beef with that and will call them out for a war on the east side, west side, and all sides.

And don't forget Jebby Jazzy Bush who wants to continue the Bush family legacy and finish the job that OG Dubya started.

...:lol:

Uh the dems are the kings of treating women like crap....Just ask Hillary Clinton and Sara Palin how the libs in the media,and the Obots treated them. They are also highly racist,while pointing the fingers at everyone else..cuz you see they are also lying hypocrites on top of everything else.
 
If Rush is now the face of the Republican party, then he should run in 2010! I am suRe lots of the far right would vote for him. But remember that there will be lots of questioons for him to answer, such as, why he used prescription drugs illegally. GO RUSH!


Why would they make an issue out of that,when the could care less that Oblah blah used illegal drugs and paid a male prostitute for sex. GO Obama!

Paid a male prostitute for sex? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


Yep...the same one he did drugs with in the back of his limo.
 
Conservatism and reactionaryism are choices the GOP has to make.

If they want to appeal to moderates they will take a conservative line on social policy rather than the reactionaryism that their CPAC conference seems to be urging.

On economic policy I think they've been squeezed by the Dems. It's got to the point almost everywhere (except a few holdouts) where market economies rule and it's just a question of management of the economy rather than any ideological approach. GOP supporters need to drop the fantasy of Obama being a socialist. It's deluded. They'd be much better of focusing on the effective management of the economy by the administration rather than leaping up and down about some sort of fantasy that will not become reality.

Limbaugh and Coulter have to cease being the voice of the Republican Party. They don't care about the Party, they only care about themselves. They're salespeople, selling their image, appealing to base instinct to make money. That's fine, let them, but why the GOP is allowing these faux extremists to be their public face is beyond me. The moderates that have to be engaged for the GOP to get back into government are not convinced that Limbaugh and Coulter have any answers to difficult questions.

Ditch the reactionarysim. Forget the Reagan myth. Get back to Burkean conservatism.

Good summary and good direction. As I grow older, I see myself becoming more conservative and perhaps one day leaning more towards the GOP than Demos but if the party is going to allow Coulter and Limbaugh to call the shots they will lose every time. They are hate mongers who have become very wealthy selling their swill to the right wing masses. I honestly don't want the GOP to disappear but as I consider it, they are surely committing suicide. Voting demographics in this country are not the same as they were when Reagon won.

It seems that the stance that Rush and Coulter have taken is, "Agree with us and we will win together or don't agree with us and just go away." Wait, I think that it the GOP platform...sorry.
 
Last edited:
Conservatism and reactionaryism are choices the GOP has to make.

If they want to appeal to moderates they will take a conservative line on social policy rather than the reactionaryism that their CPAC conference seems to be urging.

On economic policy I think they've been squeezed by the Dems. It's got to the point almost everywhere (except a few holdouts) where market economies rule and it's just a question of management of the economy rather than any ideological approach. GOP supporters need to drop the fantasy of Obama being a socialist. It's deluded. They'd be much better of focusing on the effective management of the economy by the administration rather than leaping up and down about some sort of fantasy that will not become reality.

Limbaugh and Coulter have to cease being the voice of the Republican Party. They don't care about the Party, they only care about themselves. They're salespeople, selling their image, appealing to base instinct to make money. That's fine, let them, but why the GOP is allowing these faux extremists to be their public face is beyond me. The moderates that have to be engaged for the GOP to get back into government are not convinced that Limbaugh and Coulter have any answers to difficult questions.

Ditch the reactionarysim. Forget the Reagan myth. Get back to Burkean conservatism.

Good summary and good direction. As I grow older, I see myself becoming more conservative and perhaps one day leaning more towards the GOP than Demos but if the party is going to allow Coulter and Limbaugh to call the shots they will lose every time. They are hate mongers who have become very wealthy selling their swill to the right wing masses. I honestly don't want the GOP to disappear but as I consider it, they are surely committing suicide. Voting demographics in this country are not the same as they were when Reagon won.

It seems that the stance that Rush and Coulter have taken is, "Agree with us and we will win together or don't agree with us and just go away." Wait, I think that it the GOP platform...sorry.


More hypocracy...wasn't it the DNC and Obots that told HRC voters to take a hike...that they didn't need them anyway? All because they had the nerve to not support the chosen one. Yep, it sure was....then later told them they "had" to vote for Obama over McCain and "get over it",when they said they wouldn't vote for the chosen one either. Libs crack me up with their projection...
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top