Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't hide from my actions. If I move a thread, I state why. If I warn someone, I state why. If I lock a thread, I state why. If I clean a thread with multiple replies deleted, I leave a note in the thread telling people to stay on topic.If you had the courage of your convictions, Aye, you would not have to hide behind a curtain of secrecy.
They are definitely doing that.Drama lovers are gonna keep on drama'ing.
No they don't.People have very legitimate points.
Moderators should be impartial. Most are not.
Yep.They shouldn't be allowed to have all those socks, either.
Again, how is it the mods fault if someone violates the rules?It's the fault of people setting policy.
If that includes you, then accept responsibility.
But be prepared for blowback.
When the moderating process is opaque it will always be considered unfair.
Which mods have socks? PM me the details and if found to be true, I'll happily permaban them.They shouldn't be allowed to have all those socks, either.
Well, let's see - we have you and we have Taz and we have this mysterious "bdtex" who is acting just like they are one of you with a handle that has not been seen in YEARS, has immediately inserted themselves right into the middle of this and is revealing familiarity with posters a person back such a short time should not really have, yet.Which mods have socks? PM me the details and if found to be true, I'll happily permaban them.
Who is it that makes the decision?Again, how is it the mods fault if someone violates the rules?
Are we holding a gun to people's heads and forcing them to start a thread with one sentence or no sentences?
Are we forcing people to start a thread without any opinion of their own?
Are we forcing people to troll others in Zones 1 and 2?
Are we forcing people to reply to threads in Zones 1 and 2 with nothing but flames?
Are we forcing people to reply to threads in Zones 1 and 2 with no content related to the topic?
Are we forcing people to derail threads?
I only have this account. Taz only has the one account.Well, let's see - we have you and we have Taz and we have this mysterious "bdtex" who is acting just like they are one of you with a handle that has not been seen in YEARS, has immediately inserted themselves right into the middle of this and is revealing familiarity with posters a person back such a short time should not really have, yet.
You can always start there.
Admin (forum owners) created the rules and mods enforce them.Who is it that makes the decision?
How is the decision made?
I'm not calling blame here I'm calling for an open process.
Why would you be opposed to exposing the process for all to see?
I hope the whiners take you up on that.If you want to report bdtex, do so.
I am not saying it is either of youI only have this account. Taz only has the one account.
If you want to report bdtex, do so.
Report me. Whine about me too.I am not saying it is either of you
I was told I didn't even need to break a rule to be censored and on two different occasions you corroborated the fact that I had not broken any rule yet was censored by the mod who had threatened me, anyway.Admin (forum owners) created the rules and mods enforce them.
Open process for what? For seeing what people report?
An open process ensures that the Forum as a whole have confidence or at least understand the results.Admin (forum owners) created the rules and mods enforce them.
Open process for what? For seeing what people report?
Oh I have! It's a work in progress and I've already seen changes for the better.I was told I didn't even need to break a rule to be censored and on two different occasions you corroborated the fact that I had not broken any rule yet was censored by the mod who had threatened me, anyway.
Instead of all this smoke and mirrors shit, have you thought of dealing with that and the others targeted in similar manner, instead?
