shame on Obama and his supporters

[NoNukes]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

ISIS taking Bagdad is Obama's problem? Fuck them. Do not let more American soldiers die for the interest of the very rich.

 

[Moonglow]

I thought Iran had Baghdad's back?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Don't worry guys we can always invade Iraq again whenever. It'll pay for itself with oil again just like last time.

 

[Moonglow]

Don't worry guys we can always invade Iraq again whenever. It'll pay for itself with oil again just like last time.

I thought that the original plan from 1990....

 

[Avorysuds]

What a shame you don't have access to news.

I agree, everyone knows Obama lied when running for President the first time when he said the first thing he will do as President is end the Iraq war. Obama credits and blames Bush for ending the Iraq war and thus ISIS.

Thanks for bringing that up Nutty Duddy.

 

[Avorysuds]

Don't worry guys we can always invade Iraq again whenever. It'll pay for itself with oil again just like last time.

Come on, lets hear it! Democrats for more was because the President is Democrat!

 

[Katzndogz]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

Let's start with your lie that Obama only reads 40% of his security briefings and work our way back from there .......

You're right.
It's probably closer to 30%.

Does he read any? He was warned about isis for over a year. If he read 30% that means he had to have read something. He read nothing.

 

[Avorysuds]

Don't worry guys we can always invade Iraq again whenever. It'll pay for itself with oil again just like last time.

I thought that the original plan from 1990....

Who knows, but it's 2014 and we're still there! Vote Obama 2008 to end Iraq!!!

 

[Avorysuds]

I love watching so many progressives pretend they are not part of the biggest war party lol. All that massive military spending under Obama does not count!!!! Who cares if it's more than how much Bush was spending, who cares if we're involved in more countries than when Bush was President!!!!

haha... silly widdle hacks.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Anyone, give us one good reason more Americans should die defending Iraq when the Iraqis won't defend themselves,

despite having more than enough manpower and equipment to do so.

ONE GOOD REASON. I've been asking this question btw for about a month.

 

[NYcarbineer]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

The Iraq war didn't have approval from the Democrats.

 

[The Rabbi]

I can't prove Obama read 30% of his security briefings.

I already knew that.

Can you prove Obama read any of his security briefings?
Based on his performance in foreign affairs the evidence seems to be he hasn't.

 

[The Rabbi]

Anyone, give us one good reason more Americans should die defending Iraq when the Iraqis won't defend themselves,

despite having more than enough manpower and equipment to do so.

ONE GOOD REASON. I've been asking this question btw for about a month.

You're asking the wrong question.
Tell me, what happens when we abandon an area and allow a radical Muslim group to use the resources of that area for whatever they want? You think that ever happened before?

 

[jknowgood]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

Let's start with your lie that Obama only reads 40% of his security briefings and work our way back from there .......

His advisers told him about isis and what they were doing. It looks like Obama found out another major event on the 11 o'clock news. Shame on Obama, he is to busy fundraising or golfing to know what is going on.

Still waiting for you to prove this claim of yours ...

"We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings."

I was actually being gracious to him, we know he found out about bengazi on the evening news. That's probably how he finds everything out. Is that better?

Umm, that doesn't actually prove your fallacious claim. Seems you can't.

Yes, and Oblama should have known that the Iraqi soldier, after Boosh was done with them , meant they couldna fight their way out of a wet paper bag...

Obama and all the liberals on here bragged about the successful end to the iraq war. Now your still trying to blame Bush. How entertaining.

 

[Moonglow]

Let's start with your lie that Obama only reads 40% of his security briefings and work our way back from there .......

His advisers told him about isis and what they were doing. It looks like Obama found out another major event on the 11 o'clock news. Shame on Obama, he is to busy fundraising or golfing to know what is going on.

Still waiting for you to prove this claim of yours ...

"We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings."

I was actually being gracious to him, we know he found out about bengazi on the evening news. That's probably how he finds everything out. Is that better?

Umm, that doesn't actually prove your fallacious claim. Seems you can't.

Yes, and Oblama should have known that the Iraqi soldier, after Boosh was done with them , meant they couldna fight their way out of a wet paper bag...

Obama and all the liberals on here bragged about the successful end to the iraq war. Now your still trying to blame Bush. How entertaining.

Well, I could blame his generals.....

 

[jknowgood]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

You should be disgraceful in private, for the benefit of us all.

As opposed to a liberal that is disgraceful to the entire United states, in public? What the hell are you taking today?

 

[jknowgood]

His advisers told him about isis and what they were doing. It looks like Obama found out another major event on the 11 o'clock news. Shame on Obama, he is to busy fundraising or golfing to know what is going on.

Still waiting for you to prove this claim of yours ...

"We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings."

I was actually being gracious to him, we know he found out about bengazi on the evening news. That's probably how he finds everything out. Is that better?

Umm, that doesn't actually prove your fallacious claim. Seems you can't.

Yes, and Oblama should have known that the Iraqi soldier, after Boosh was done with them , meant they couldna fight their way out of a wet paper bag...

Obama and all the liberals on here bragged about the successful end to the iraq war. Now your still trying to blame Bush. How entertaining.

Well, I could blame his generals.....

Lol, your an idiot, he doesn't listen to his generals. If he did isis wouldn't be so strong, they warned him.

 

[jknowgood]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

ISIS taking Bagdad is Obama's problem? Fuck them. Do not let more American soldiers die for the interest of the very rich.

Obama owns this, if he would be a leader, we wouldn't have this problem. Remember he successfully ended the iraq war, and now it's a cluster fuck. Thanks Obama!

 

[jknowgood]

On this forum we hear all the time how the illegal war "which had approval from the democrats" took 4000 lives of our great soldiers. The very one's that liberals counted daily while Bush was president, for only political reasons. We hear about them when a liberal tries to cover an Obama mistake. So after Obama successfully ended the iraq war, for only political reasons. Now we have isis, fixing to take Bagdad. If they do they have control of Iraq. We know Obama only reads about 40% of his security briefings. So thank you Obama for ignoring isis, for political reasons, and for making the sacrifice of 4000 lives to go in vain. To his supporters you will never have any reason to use those great soldiers lives for political reasons again. Shame on everyone of you, and on Obama.

The Iraq war didn't have approval from the Democrats.

Your an idiot even kerry voted for it, and hillary too. He got the U.N.'s approval and both houses approval.

 

[EconChick]

Sadly things are only going to get worse since the air strikes are all for show.

Baghdad is no doubt already penetrated by ISIS and the airport and/or Green Zone could fall soon.