You have to be right before you can be told you're right. And I've always regarded you fairly direct. The instance you refer to was after a somewhat lengthy exchange and afterwards, I had finally left to perform work. But, I guess it's easier for you to create your own version of reality. That's no secret.
I invited you to post any evidence; you made several more posts over several hours, and had nothing. Now you've made another one, and you still have nothing.
How much makes zero?
I declined your 'invite' on a particular matter(s) and adequately clarified my reasons. Get over yourself, dude. I'm not interested in allowing you to be my personal time suck.
But, here's some truth. You're a progressive. Daveman even gave you a test for it and you did not respond directly to him, hypocrite. That is why you love yourself some Obama and hate yourself some Rush. Can you deny that? And if so, will you be giving reasons rather than making lame challenges for people to dig into your posts or present you with mounds of common knowledge?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rgLd6A0DWM]Tom Jones I who have have nothing (LIVE) - Best Version - YouTube[/ame]
Wtf would you know about "truth"? You've made at least half a dozen posts in two days. I called on you to justify your claim, now you're claiming time constraints, yet you've got the time to write a half dozen empty posts.
I expected this failure; I just didn't expect so much whining. Most guys try to slip out the door unnoticed; you actually call attention to empty posts.
Moreover, I replied to everything Daveman put up. Yet he's saying that his point is different from yours. Maybe you should spend more time reading and less posting nothing.
Now where were we... ah yes.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQFEY9RIRJA]Cricket Chirping - YouTube[/ame]