Ron Paul: "Why Don't We Mind Our Own Business?"...

[Remodeling Maidiac]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

 

[Dr.Drock]

Most Paul supporters despise Israel so countries like Iran and Syria can do no harm in their eyes..

Lol good girl, keep rehashing the talking points your status quo parties are feeding you.



I'm a Paul supporter, the U.S. should respect the sovereignty of the Israel gov't and not meddle in their business. If it's their business to blow up Palestine or surrender everything they have to Palestine, we shouldn't get involved.

We've had allies and stood by them since the inception of our great Republic. Were it not for France there would not be a United States of America. Just because you Paulettes have no problem with turning your back on our friends, doesn't mean the rest of us are going to follow suit.

Great example, France and our revolution.

France helped us with our revolution, then France had a revolution right after and we couldn't help because we didn't have the money and manpower to help them.

Guess what the situation is now? We don't have the manpower or money to support our foreign policy.


Great example, a perfect parallel for me.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Ron Paul's isolationist policy is dangerous in a world that seeks to destroy us. Paulettes can keep their heads buried in the sand.. that won't make our enemies and their real intent to attack us go away. He needs to stop looking soo doofy up there too.. they did a lot of cutaways last night and he looked a bit looney.

Ron Paul is not an isolationist. That is a common unfair & inaccurate smear on the man. He fully supports free & fair trade with the entire World. But we don't need to be meddling in every nations' business to accomplish that. He is not an isolationist.

I have listened to him all throughout the debates and he most certainly is an Isolationist. I like a lot of things Ron Paul stands for but this isn't one of them.. he's way off the mark regarding the most important duty for a sitting President of the United States, to protect America from enemies foreign and domestic.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Lol good girl, keep rehashing the talking points your status quo parties are feeding you.



I'm a Paul supporter, the U.S. should respect the sovereignty of the Israel gov't and not meddle in their business. If it's their business to blow up Palestine or surrender everything they have to Palestine, we shouldn't get involved.

We've had allies and stood by them since the inception of our great Republic. Were it not for France there would not be a United States of America. Just because you Paulettes have no problem with turning your back on our friends, doesn't mean the rest of us are going to follow suit.

Great example, France and our revolution.

France helped us with our revolution, then France had a revolution right after and we couldn't help because we didn't have the money and manpower to help them.

Guess what the situation is now? We don't have the manpower or money to support our foreign policy.


Great example, a perfect parallel for me.

Remind me to never befriend a Paulette. So let me get this straight.. Should an ally find themselves in financial trouble, this negates the need to befriend nations?

 

[Dr.Drock]

If China or Russia were doing the same things our gov't was doing all over the world we'd be saying:

"Why don't they mind their own business?"

If a frog had wings he wouldn't hit is ass on the ground every time he hopped.

Let's stay with fact's and not "what if's".

Fact is, we have been asking Russia and China to help in our effort to reign in countries that harbor and offer safe havens for terrorist. We've ask them to help with sanctions on Iran. They refuse to help.

So you want increased sanctions, your neocon heros want increased sanctions, Paul doesn't, but Paul is the isolationist?



Kudos to the media and propaganda machines of both parties for convincing people to think this. It's an absolute marvel to behold how someone can be convinced to think such a way.

 

[paulitician]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

 

[Dr.Drock]

We've had allies and stood by them since the inception of our great Republic. Were it not for France there would not be a United States of America. Just because you Paulettes have no problem with turning your back on our friends, doesn't mean the rest of us are going to follow suit.

Great example, France and our revolution.

France helped us with our revolution, then France had a revolution right after and we couldn't help because we didn't have the money and manpower to help them.

Guess what the situation is now? We don't have the manpower or money to support our foreign policy.


Great example, a perfect parallel for me.

Remind me to never befriend a Paulette. So let me get this straight.. Should an ally find themselves in financial trouble, this negates the need to befriend nations?

Sure we should loan money when we have money to lend if it benefits the U.S. taxpayer.


When was the last time we had money to spare and weren't running up debt?

 

[zzzz]

Isolationism = a state refrains from involving itself in the affairs of other states.
Interventionism = a state gets involved in the affairs of other states

Our founding fathers wanted America to mind its own business because the colonial powers that ruled over America were interventionists. This attitude basically lasted until the twentieth century and after WWII we started intervening into almost every country we could. Today the global economy is so intertwined that isolationism is probably not possible. We are the major power in the world and historically when there is a power vacuum (no big dog so to speak) conflict becomes inevitable because other countries try to become that power.

Now we do not have to have troops stationed all over the world like we do now. The future of warfare is drones and stand off weapon systems, not occupation troops. We can hit anywhere in the world within hours with conventional weapons now and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan has shown that having troops on the ground is not effective and cost too much in lives and money.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

Ron Paul and his followers are the only ones who can save America???? DID YOU JUST REALLY SAY THAT?!!!!!!!!!

 

[Bern80]

I also agree with most of Paul's positions. But Newt did make a good counter point in regard to aiding Israel. Paul's positions is basically that we should not be aiding either Israel or Iran and if they want to have it out, so be it. Iran will soon likely have a nuke and Israel already does. Newt pointed out that if we don't aid Israel in some fashion and they are then forced to use their nukes to defend themselves the world is gonna get pretty shitty in a hurry. It is still in the best interest in the national security of america that the U.S. in some form or other be involved in such a conflict if it were to take place (though Paul noted that he believes that be highly unlikely it would come to that).

 

[Dr.Drock]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

He doesn't like different voices. He wants 10 republicans at the debates who just repeat what each other is saying. We're close to that.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

Give it a rest. Paul will NEVER be elected for President. And he damn sure won't win the GOP nomination.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Great example, France and our revolution.

France helped us with our revolution, then France had a revolution right after and we couldn't help because we didn't have the money and manpower to help them.

Guess what the situation is now? We don't have the manpower or money to support our foreign policy.


Great example, a perfect parallel for me.

Remind me to never befriend a Paulette. So let me get this straight.. Should an ally find themselves in financial trouble, this negates the need to befriend nations?

Sure we should loan money when we have money to lend if it benefits the U.S. taxpayer.


When was the last time we had money to spare and weren't running up debt?

In 1941, the national debt of the United States was $49 billion. At the end of the war, in 1945, the debt rose to $258 billion.



Read more: What was US debt from World War 2

I guess we should have let the Japanese slaughter us and to hell with it.. Fuck it, we ran up debt.. fuck all of our allies.. you're on your own.


Some of you people are damn frightening!

 

[Dr.Drock]

I also agree with most of Paul's positions. But Newt did make a good counter point in regard to aiding Israel. Paul's positions is basically that we should not be aiding either Israel or Iran and if they want to have it out, so be it. Iran will soon likely have a nuke and Israel already does. Newt pointed out that if we don't aid Israel in some fashion and they are then forced to use their nukes to defend themselves the world is gonna get pretty shitty in a hurry. It is still in the best interest in the national security of america that the U.S. in some form or other be involved in such a conflict if it were to take place (though Paul noted that he believes that be highly unlikely it would come to that).

No chance Iran would ever use a nuke, it'd be suicide.

The only chance Israel uses a nuke is if they're ordered by the U.S. to use one, because terrorist attacks would increase 50 times over on Israel if they nuked a middle eastern country.

 

[Bern80]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

Ron Paul and his followers are the only ones who can save America???? DID YOU JUST REALLY SAY THAT?!!!!!!!!!

And I agree. He is one of the only people that 'gets it'. Neither of the two major parties do. This supercommittee to fix our debt really was an absolute joke of solution. I did the math on the proposal that the REPUBLICANS made and even with their cuts it would take close to 200 years to pay down the debt. It really is an absolute joke. I can't identify one other candidate that is willing to really do what it takes to fix this problem. The simple cold hard fact is the ONLY way to fix this and prevent from happening in the future is too literally gut the federal government. And Paul is the only candidate that sees that.

 

[paulitician]

No offence but ill be glad when Paul drops out. It's really tiring listening to all the paulbots.

Sorry to hear that. Because we're the only ones who can save this nation now. How much more pain & suffering are the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons going to be allowed to inflict on us?

Ron Paul and his followers are the only ones who can save America???? DID YOU JUST REALLY SAY THAT?!!!!!!!!!

Yes. Because it's true. Look at what the Socialists/Progressives & Neocons have done to our Country. I think it's time for some real change.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

I also agree with most of Paul's positions. But Newt did make a good counter point in regard to aiding Israel. Paul's positions is basically that we should not be aiding either Israel or Iran and if they want to have it out, so be it. Iran will soon likely have a nuke and Israel already does. Newt pointed out that if we don't aid Israel in some fashion and they are then forced to use their nukes to defend themselves the world is gonna get pretty shitty in a hurry. It is still in the best interest in the national security of america that the U.S. in some form or other be involved in such a conflict if it were to take place (though Paul noted that he believes that be highly unlikely it would come to that).

No chance Iran would ever use a nuke, it'd be suicide.

The only chance Israel uses a nuke is if they're ordered by the U.S. to use one, because terrorist attacks would increase 50 times over on Israel if they nuked a middle eastern country.

IRAN SAYS 2007 COULD BRING ISLAMIC MESSIAH, POSSIBLY THIS SPRING
Ahmadinejad Wants the Bomb to Help Bring the Muslim Messiah
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/GrantSwank60123a.htm
Waiting for Islam's Messiah - World - CBN News - Christian News 24-7 - CBN.com


Over and over Iran has telegraphed their intent to not only use nuclear weapons but to bring about nuclear holocaust.. I'm really sick and tired of IGNORANT ass Paulettes trying to pretend like this MUSLIM FANATIC NATION isn't hellbent on nuclear war. WE CAN ALL READ AND LISTEN FOR OURSELVES. Quit acting like liberals and lying about this shit.

 

[Rocko]

That's why Ron Paul is so popular with young kids. To say "we should just mind our own business", is such simple reasoning, to the most complex issue a country has on its table (foreign policy).

And Paul, believe it or nor there are groups and governments, outside of America that want us destroyed, and that's NOT Americas fault.

 

[paulitician]

That's why Ron Paul is so popular with young kids. To say "we should just mind our own business", is such simple reasoning, to the most complex issue a country has on its table (foreign policy).

And Paul, believe it or nor there are groups and governments, outside of America that want us destroyed, and that's NOT Americas fault.

Maybe they wouldn't want us destroyed if we stayed out of their internal affairs and just conducted free & open trade with them? Hey,there's an idea no? They don't have to be our enemy.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

That's why Ron Paul is so popular with young kids. To say "we should just mind our own business", is such simple reasoning, to the most complex issue a country has on its table (foreign policy).

And Paul, believe it or nor there are groups and governments, outside of America that want us destroyed, and that's NOT Americas fault.

Maybe they wouldn't want us destroyed if we stayed out of their internal affairs and just conducted free & open trade with them? Hey,there's an idea no? They don't have to be our enemy.

I guess like we butted in to Japan's biznez also, right?? For the life of me I cannot understand the bizarre thinking of the Paulettes.. it's literal fucking nuts.

Dear Bad Guys,

The Paulette Brigade wants to be friends, ok? We promise to mind our own business, to allow you to destroy and kill our allies leaving us all alone in this dangerous world and we're going to take your word that once you've finished off Israel and Great Britain, possibly more, because we sent you cards and stuff, didnt intervene, you nice fanatical muslims will leave us alone.

Thank you so much!

Signed the only people who can save America, Ron Paul and the Paulettes

PS- If we're really really good, can we openly practice our own religious beliefs without you getting upset? If it makes you too mad, we'll give that up too.. Just let us know, k? We don't want to piss you off or anything and force you to kill more Americans.. we're sorry we made you do it all of these times.